brintos

brintos / linux-shallow public Read only

0
0
Text · 6.6 KiB · 585630d Raw
145 lines · plain
1.. SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR CC-BY-4.0)2.. [see the bottom of this file for redistribution information]3 4======================5Bisecting a regression6======================7 8This document describes how to use a ``git bisect`` to find the source code9change that broke something -- for example when some functionality stopped10working after upgrading from Linux 6.0 to 6.1.11 12The text focuses on the gist of the process. If you are new to bisecting the13kernel, better follow Documentation/admin-guide/verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.rst14instead: it depicts everything from start to finish while covering multiple15aspects even kernel developers occasionally forget. This includes detecting16situations early where a bisection would be a waste of time, as nobody would17care about the result -- for example, because the problem happens after the18kernel marked itself as 'tainted', occurs in an abandoned version, was already19fixed, or is caused by a .config change you or your Linux distributor performed.20 21Finding the change causing a kernel issue using a bisection22===========================================================23 24*Note: the following process assumes you prepared everything for a bisection.25This includes having a Git clone with the appropriate sources, installing the26software required to build and install kernels, as well as a .config file stored27in a safe place (the following example assumes '~/prepared_kernel_.config') to28use as pristine base at each bisection step; ideally, you have also worked out29a fully reliable and straight-forward way to reproduce the regression, too.*30 31* Preparation: start the bisection and tell Git about the points in the history32  you consider to be working and broken, which Git calls 'good' and 'bad'::33 34     git bisect start35     git bisect good v6.036     git bisect bad v6.137 38  Instead of Git tags like 'v6.0' and 'v6.1' you can specify commit-ids, too.39 401. Copy your prepared .config into the build directory and adjust it to the41   needs of the codebase Git checked out for testing::42 43     cp ~/prepared_kernel_.config .config44     make olddefconfig45 462. Now build, install, and boot a kernel. This might fail for unrelated reasons,47   for example, when a compile error happens at the current stage of the48   bisection a later change resolves. In such cases run ``git bisect skip`` and49   go back to step 1.50 513. Check if the functionality that regressed works in the kernel you just built.52 53   If it works, execute::54 55     git bisect good56 57   If it is broken, run::58 59     git bisect bad60 61   Note, getting this wrong just once will send the rest of the bisection62   totally off course. To prevent having to start anew later you thus want to63   ensure what you tell Git is correct; it is thus often wise to spend a few64   minutes more on testing in case your reproducer is unreliable.65 66   After issuing one of these two commands, Git will usually check out another67   bisection point and print something like 'Bisecting: 675 revisions left to68   test after this (roughly 10 steps)'. In that case go back to step 1.69 70   If Git instead prints something like 'cafecaca0c0dacafecaca0c0dacafecaca0c0da71   is the first bad commit', then you have finished the bisection. In that case72   move to the next point below. Note, right after displaying that line Git will73   show some details about the culprit including its patch description; this can74   easily fill your terminal, so you might need to scroll up to see the message75   mentioning the culprit's commit-id.76 77   In case you missed Git's output, you can always run ``git bisect log`` to78   print the status: it will show how many steps remain or mention the result of79   the bisection.80 81* Recommended complementary task: put the bisection log and the current .config82  file aside for the bug report; furthermore tell Git to reset the sources to83  the state before the bisection::84 85     git bisect log > ~/bisection-log86     cp .config ~/bisection-config-culprit87     git bisect reset88 89* Recommended optional task: try reverting the culprit on top of the latest90  codebase and check if that fixes your bug; if that is the case, it validates91  the bisection and enables developers to resolve the regression through a92  revert.93 94  To try this, update your clone and check out latest mainline. Then tell Git95  to revert the change by specifying its commit-id::96 97     git revert --no-edit cafec0cacaca098 99  Git might reject this, for example when the bisection landed on a merge100  commit. In that case, abandon the attempt. Do the same, if Git fails to revert101  the culprit on its own because later changes depend on it -- at least unless102  you bisected a stable or longterm kernel series, in which case you want to103  check out its latest codebase and try a revert there.104 105  If a revert succeeds, build and test another kernel to check if reverting106  resolved your regression.107 108With that the process is complete. Now report the regression as described by109Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst.110 111 112Additional reading material113---------------------------114 115* The `man page for 'git bisect' <https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect>`_ and116  `fighting regressions with 'git bisect' <https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect-lk2009.html>`_117  in the Git documentation.118* `Working with git bisect <https://nathanchance.dev/posts/working-with-git-bisect/>`_119  from kernel developer Nathan Chancellor.120* `Using Git bisect to figure out when brokenness was introduced <http://webchick.net/node/99>`_.121* `Fully automated bisecting with 'git bisect run' <https://lwn.net/Articles/317154>`_.122 123..124   end-of-content125..126   This document is maintained by Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>. If127   you spot a typo or small mistake, feel free to let him know directly and128   he'll fix it. You are free to do the same in a mostly informal way if you129   want to contribute changes to the text -- but for copyright reasons please CC130   linux-doc@vger.kernel.org and 'sign-off' your contribution as131   Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst explains in the section 'Sign132   your work - the Developer's Certificate of Origin'.133..134   This text is available under GPL-2.0+ or CC-BY-4.0, as stated at the top135   of the file. If you want to distribute this text under CC-BY-4.0 only,136   please use 'The Linux kernel development community' for author attribution137   and link this as source:138   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/Documentation/admin-guide/bug-bisect.rst139 140..141   Note: Only the content of this RST file as found in the Linux kernel sources142   is available under CC-BY-4.0, as versions of this text that were processed143   (for example by the kernel's build system) might contain content taken from144   files which use a more restrictive license.145