brintos

brintos / linux-shallow public Read only

0
0
Text · 2.8 KiB · 53e6b2d Raw
109 lines · c
1/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */2#ifndef FWH_LOCK_H3#define FWH_LOCK_H4 5 6enum fwh_lock_state {7        FWH_UNLOCKED   = 0,8	FWH_DENY_WRITE = 1,9	FWH_IMMUTABLE  = 2,10	FWH_DENY_READ  = 4,11};12 13struct fwh_xxlock_thunk {14	enum fwh_lock_state val;15	flstate_t state;16};17 18 19#define FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_LOCK   ((struct fwh_xxlock_thunk){ FWH_DENY_WRITE, FL_LOCKING})20#define FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_UNLOCK ((struct fwh_xxlock_thunk){ FWH_UNLOCKED,   FL_UNLOCKING})21 22/*23 * This locking/unlock is specific to firmware hub parts.  Only one24 * is known that supports the Intel command set.    Firmware25 * hub parts cannot be interleaved as they are on the LPC bus26 * so this code has not been tested with interleaved chips,27 * and will likely fail in that context.28 */29static int fwh_xxlock_oneblock(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,30	unsigned long adr, int len, void *thunk)31{32	struct cfi_private *cfi = map->fldrv_priv;33	struct fwh_xxlock_thunk *xxlt = (struct fwh_xxlock_thunk *)thunk;34	int ret;35 36	/* Refuse the operation if the we cannot look behind the chip */37	if (chip->start < 0x400000) {38		pr_debug( "MTD %s(): chip->start: %lx wanted >= 0x400000\n",39			__func__, chip->start );40		return -EIO;41	}42	/*43	 * lock block registers:44	 * - on 64k boundariesand45	 * - bit 1 set high46	 * - block lock registers are 4MiB lower - overflow subtract (danger)47	 *48	 * The address manipulation is first done on the logical address49	 * which is 0 at the start of the chip, and then the offset of50	 * the individual chip is addted to it.  Any other order a weird51	 * map offset could cause problems.52	 */53	adr = (adr & ~0xffffUL) | 0x2;54	adr += chip->start - 0x400000;55 56	/*57	 * This is easy because these are writes to registers and not writes58	 * to flash memory - that means that we don't have to check status59	 * and timeout.60	 */61	mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);62	ret = get_chip(map, chip, adr, FL_LOCKING);63	if (ret) {64		mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);65		return ret;66	}67 68	chip->oldstate = chip->state;69	chip->state = xxlt->state;70	map_write(map, CMD(xxlt->val), adr);71 72	/* Done and happy. */73	chip->state = chip->oldstate;74	put_chip(map, chip, adr);75	mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);76	return 0;77}78 79 80static int fwh_lock_varsize(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)81{82	int ret;83 84	ret = cfi_varsize_frob(mtd, fwh_xxlock_oneblock, ofs, len,85		(void *)&FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_LOCK);86 87	return ret;88}89 90 91static int fwh_unlock_varsize(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)92{93	int ret;94 95	ret = cfi_varsize_frob(mtd, fwh_xxlock_oneblock, ofs, len,96		(void *)&FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_UNLOCK);97 98	return ret;99}100 101static void fixup_use_fwh_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd)102{103	printk(KERN_NOTICE "using fwh lock/unlock method\n");104	/* Setup for the chips with the fwh lock method */105	mtd->_lock   = fwh_lock_varsize;106	mtd->_unlock = fwh_unlock_varsize;107}108#endif /* FWH_LOCK_H */109