brintos

brintos / llvm-project-archived public Read only

0
0
Text · 5.1 KiB · a15df06 Raw
153 lines · cpp
1// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fcxx-exceptions -verify -std=c++11 -Wall -Wno-unused-local-typedefs %s2 3template<bool b> struct ExceptionIf { static int f(); };4template<> struct ExceptionIf<false> { typedef int f; };5 6// The exception specification of a defaulted default constructor depends on7// the contents of in-class member initializers. However, the in-class member8// initializers can depend on the exception specification of the constructor,9// since the class is considered complete within them. We reject any such cases.10namespace InClassInitializers {11  // Noexcept::Noexcept() is implicitly declared as noexcept(false), because it12  // directly invokes ThrowSomething(). However...13  //14  // If noexcept(Noexcept()) is false, then Noexcept() is a constant expression,15  // so noexcept(Noexcept()) is true. But if noexcept(Noexcept()) is true, then16  // Noexcept::Noexcept is not declared constexpr, therefore noexcept(Noexcept())17  // is false.18  bool ThrowSomething() noexcept(false);19  struct ConstExpr { // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'b' needed}}20    bool b = // expected-note {{declared here}}21      noexcept(ConstExpr()) && ThrowSomething(); // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}22  };23 24  // Much more obviously broken: we can't parse the initializer without already25  // knowing whether it produces a noexcept expression.26  struct TemplateArg { // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'n' needed}}27    int n = // expected-note {{declared here}}28      ExceptionIf<noexcept(TemplateArg())>::f(); // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}29  };30 31  // And within a nested class.32  struct Nested {33    struct Inner { // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'n' needed}}34      int n = // expected-note {{declared here}}35        ExceptionIf<noexcept(Nested())>::f(); // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}36    } inner; // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}37  };38 39  struct Nested2 {40    struct Inner;41    int n = Inner().n; // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}42    struct Inner { // expected-error {{initializer for 'n' needed}}43      int n = ExceptionIf<noexcept(Nested2())>::f(); // expected-note {{declared here}}44    } inner;45  };46}47 48namespace ExceptionSpecification {49  struct Nested {50    struct T {51      T() noexcept(!noexcept(Nested())); // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}52    } t; // expected-error{{exception specification is not available until end of class definition}}53  };54}55 56namespace DefaultArgument {57  // FIXME: We should detect and diagnose the cyclic dependence of58  // noexcept(Default()) on itself here.59  struct Default {60    struct T {61      T(int = ExceptionIf<noexcept(Default())>::f());62    } t;63  };64}65 66namespace ImplicitDtorExceptionSpec {67  struct A {68    virtual ~A();69 70    struct Inner {71      ~Inner() throw();72    };73    Inner inner;74  };75 76  struct B {77    virtual ~B() {} // expected-note {{here}}78  };79 80  struct C : B {81    virtual ~C() {}82    A a;83  };84 85  struct D : B {86    ~D(); // expected-error {{more lax than base}}87    struct E {88      ~E();89      struct F {90        ~F() throw(A);91      } f;92    } e;93  };94}95 96struct nothrow_t {} nothrow;97void *operator new(decltype(sizeof(0)), nothrow_t) noexcept;98 99namespace PotentiallyConstructed {100  template<bool NE> struct A {101    A() noexcept(NE);102    A(const A&) noexcept(NE);103    A(A&&) noexcept(NE);104    A &operator=(const A&) noexcept(NE);105    A &operator=(A&&) noexcept(NE);106    ~A() noexcept(NE);107  };108 109  template<bool NE> struct B : virtual A<NE> {};110 111  template<bool NE> struct C : virtual A<NE> {112    virtual void f() = 0; // expected-note 2{{unimplemented}}113  };114 115  template<bool NE> struct D final : C<NE> {116    void f();117  };118 119  template<typename T, bool A, bool B, bool C, bool D, bool E, bool F> void check() {120    T *p = nullptr;121    T &a = *p;122    static_assert(noexcept(a = a) == D, "");123    static_assert(noexcept(a = static_cast<T&&>(a)) == E, "");124    static_assert(noexcept(delete &a) == F, "");125 126    // These are last because the first failure here causes instantiation to bail out.127    static_assert(noexcept(new (nothrow) T()) == A, ""); // expected-error 2{{abstract}}128    static_assert(noexcept(new (nothrow) T(a)) == B, "");129    static_assert(noexcept(new (nothrow) T(static_cast<T&&>(a))) == C, "");130  }131 132  template void check<A<false>, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0>();133  template void check<A<true >, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1>();134  template void check<B<false>, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0>();135  template void check<B<true >, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1>();136  template void check<C<false>, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0>(); // expected-note {{instantiation}}137  template void check<C<true >, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1>(); // expected-note {{instantiation}}138  template void check<D<false>, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0>();139  template void check<D<true >, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1>();140 141  // ... the above trick doesn't work for this case...142  struct Cfalse : virtual A<false> {143    virtual void f() = 0;144 145    Cfalse() noexcept;146    Cfalse(const Cfalse&) noexcept;147    Cfalse(Cfalse&&) noexcept;148  };149  Cfalse::Cfalse() noexcept = default;150  Cfalse::Cfalse(const Cfalse&) noexcept = default;151  Cfalse::Cfalse(Cfalse&&) noexcept = default;152}153