brintos

brintos / llvm-project-archived public Read only

0
0
Text · 10.4 KiB · d790002 Raw
275 lines · python
1"""2Test the printing of anonymous and named namespace variables.3"""4 5 6import lldb7from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *8from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *9from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil10 11 12class NamespaceBreakpointTestCase(TestBase):13    @expectedFailureAll(bugnumber="llvm.org/pr28548", compiler="gcc")14    @expectedFailureAll(oslist=["windows"])15    def test_breakpoints_func_auto(self):16        """Test that we can set breakpoints correctly by basename to find all functions whose basename is "func"."""17        self.build()18 19        names = ["func()", "func(int)", "A::B::func()", "A::func()", "A::func(int)"]20 21        # Create a target by the debugger.22        exe = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")23        target = self.dbg.CreateTarget(exe)24        self.assertTrue(target, VALID_TARGET)25        module_list = lldb.SBFileSpecList()26        module_list.Append(lldb.SBFileSpec(exe, False))27        cu_list = lldb.SBFileSpecList()28        # Set a breakpoint by name "func" which should pick up all functions29        # whose basename is "func"30        bp = target.BreakpointCreateByName(31            "func", lldb.eFunctionNameTypeAuto, module_list, cu_list32        )33        for bp_loc in bp:34            name = bp_loc.GetAddress().GetFunction().GetName()35            self.assertIn(36                name,37                names,38                "make sure breakpoint locations are correct for 'func' with eFunctionNameTypeAuto",39            )40 41    @expectedFailureAll(bugnumber="llvm.org/pr28548", compiler="gcc")42    def test_breakpoints_func_full(self):43        """Test that we can set breakpoints correctly by fullname to find all functions whose fully qualified name is "func"44        (no namespaces)."""45        self.build()46 47        names = ["func()", "func(int)"]48 49        # Create a target by the debugger.50        exe = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")51        target = self.dbg.CreateTarget(exe)52        self.assertTrue(target, VALID_TARGET)53        module_list = lldb.SBFileSpecList()54        module_list.Append(lldb.SBFileSpec(exe, False))55        cu_list = lldb.SBFileSpecList()56 57        # Set a breakpoint by name "func" whose fullly qualified named matches "func" which58        # should pick up only functions whose basename is "func" and has no59        # containing context60        bp = target.BreakpointCreateByName(61            "func", lldb.eFunctionNameTypeFull, module_list, cu_list62        )63        for bp_loc in bp:64            name = bp_loc.GetAddress().GetFunction().GetName()65            self.assertIn(66                name,67                names,68                "make sure breakpoint locations are correct for 'func' with eFunctionNameTypeFull",69            )70 71    def test_breakpoints_a_func_full(self):72        """Test that we can set breakpoints correctly by fullname to find all functions whose fully qualified name is "A::func"."""73        self.build()74 75        names = ["A::func()", "A::func(int)"]76 77        # Create a target by the debugger.78        exe = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")79        target = self.dbg.CreateTarget(exe)80        self.assertTrue(target, VALID_TARGET)81        module_list = lldb.SBFileSpecList()82        module_list.Append(lldb.SBFileSpec(exe, False))83        cu_list = lldb.SBFileSpecList()84 85        # Set a breakpoint by name "A::func" whose fullly qualified named matches "A::func" which86        # should pick up only functions whose basename is "func" and is87        # contained in the "A" namespace88        bp = target.BreakpointCreateByName(89            "A::func", lldb.eFunctionNameTypeFull, module_list, cu_list90        )91        for bp_loc in bp:92            name = bp_loc.GetAddress().GetFunction().GetName()93            self.assertIn(94                name,95                names,96                "make sure breakpoint locations are correct for 'A::func' with eFunctionNameTypeFull",97            )98 99 100class NamespaceTestCase(TestBase):101    def setUp(self):102        # Call super's setUp().103        TestBase.setUp(self)104        # Find the line numbers for declarations of namespace variables i and105        # j.106        self.line_var_i = line_number(107            "main.cpp", "// Find the line number for anonymous namespace variable i."108        )109        self.line_var_j = line_number(110            "main.cpp", "// Find the line number for named namespace variable j."111        )112        # And the line number to break at.113        self.line_break = line_number("main.cpp", "// Set break point at this line.")114        # Break inside do {} while and evaluate value115        self.line_break_ns1 = line_number("main.cpp", "// Evaluate ns1::value")116        self.line_break_ns2 = line_number("main.cpp", "// Evaluate ns2::value")117 118    def runToBkpt(self, command):119        self.runCmd(command, RUN_SUCCEEDED)120        # The stop reason of the thread should be breakpoint.121        self.expect(122            "thread list",123            STOPPED_DUE_TO_BREAKPOINT,124            substrs=["stopped", "stop reason = breakpoint"],125        )126 127    # rdar://problem/8668674128    @expectedFailureAll(oslist=["windows"], bugnumber="llvm.org/pr24764")129    def test_with_run_command(self):130        """Test that anonymous and named namespace variables display correctly."""131        self.build()132        self.runCmd("file " + self.getBuildArtifact("a.out"), CURRENT_EXECUTABLE_SET)133 134        lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(135            self,136            "main.cpp",137            self.line_break_ns1,138            num_expected_locations=1,139            loc_exact=True,140        )141        lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(142            self,143            "main.cpp",144            self.line_break_ns2,145            num_expected_locations=1,146            loc_exact=True,147        )148        lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(149            self, "main.cpp", self.line_break, num_expected_locations=1, loc_exact=True150        )151 152        self.runToBkpt("run")153        # Evaluate ns1::value154        self.expect_expr("value", result_value="100")155 156        self.runToBkpt("continue")157        # Evaluate ns2::value158        self.expect_expr("value", result_value="200")159 160        self.runToBkpt("continue")161        # On Mac OS X, gcc 4.2 emits the wrong debug info with respect to162        # types.163        slist = ["(int) a = 12", "anon_uint", "a_uint", "b_uint", "y_uint"]164        if self.platformIsDarwin() and self.getCompiler() in ["clang"]:165            slist = [166                "(int) a = 12",167                "::my_uint_t",168                "anon_uint = 0",169                "(A::uint_t) a_uint = 1",170                "(A::B::uint_t) b_uint = 2",171                "(Y::uint_t) y_uint = 3",172            ]173 174        # 'frame variable' displays the local variables with type information.175        self.expect("frame variable", VARIABLES_DISPLAYED_CORRECTLY, substrs=slist)176 177        # 'frame variable' with basename 'i' should work.178        self.expect(179            "frame variable --show-declaration --show-globals i",180            startstr="main.cpp:%d: (int) (anonymous namespace)::i = 3"181            % self.line_var_i,182        )183        # main.cpp:12: (int) (anonymous namespace)::i = 3184 185        # 'frame variable' with basename 'j' should work, too.186        self.expect(187            "frame variable --show-declaration --show-globals j",188            startstr="main.cpp:%d: (int) A::B::j = 4" % self.line_var_j,189        )190        # main.cpp:19: (int) A::B::j = 4191 192        # 'frame variable' should support address-of operator.193        self.runCmd("frame variable &i")194 195        # 'frame variable' with fully qualified name 'A::B::j' should work.196        self.expect(197            "frame variable A::B::j",198            VARIABLES_DISPLAYED_CORRECTLY,199            startstr="(int) A::B::j = 4",200            patterns=[" = 4"],201        )202 203        # So should the anonymous namespace case.204        self.expect(205            "frame variable '(anonymous namespace)::i'",206            VARIABLES_DISPLAYED_CORRECTLY,207            startstr="(int) (anonymous namespace)::i = 3",208            patterns=[" = 3"],209        )210 211        # Search for a type in an anonymous namespace, both with and without the212        # namespace prefix.213        self.expect("type lookup -- my_uint_t", substrs=["unsigned int"])214        self.expect("type lookup -- (anonymous namespace)::my_uint_t",215                    substrs=["unsigned int"])216 217        # rdar://problem/8660275218        # test/namespace: 'expression -- i+j' not working219        # This has been fixed.220        self.expect_expr("i + j", result_type="int", result_value="7")221        # (int) $2 = 7222 223        self.expect_expr("i", result_value="3")224        self.expect_expr("j", result_value="4")225 226        # rdar://problem/8668674227        # expression command with fully qualified namespace for a variable does228        # not work229        self.expect_expr("::i", result_value="3")230        self.expect_expr("A::B::j", result_value="4")231 232        # expression command with function in anonymous namespace233        self.expect_expr("myanonfunc(3)", result_value="6")234 235        # global namespace qualification with function in anonymous namespace236        self.expect_expr("myanonfunc(4)", result_value="8")237 238        self.expect(239            "expression myanonfunc",240            patterns=[r"\(anonymous namespace\)::myanonfunc\(int\)"],241        )242 243        self.expect(244            "expression variadic_sum",245            patterns=[r"\(anonymous namespace\)::variadic_sum\(int, ...\)"],246        )247 248        self.expect_expr("::B::Bar b; b.x()", result_type="int", result_value="42")249        self.expect_expr("A::B::Bar b; b.y()", result_type="int", result_value="137")250        self.expect_expr(251            "::NS1::NS2::Foo{}.bar() == -2 && ::NS2::Foo{}.bar() == -3",252            result_type="bool",253            result_value="true",254        )255        # FIXME: C++ unqualified namespace lookups currently not supported when instantiating types.256        self.expect_expr(257            "NS2::Foo{}.bar() == -3", result_type="bool", result_value="false"258        )259        self.expect_expr(260            "((::B::Bar*)&::B::bar)->x()", result_type="int", result_value="42"261        )262 263        self.expect_expr("InAnon1::var_in_anon", result_type="int", result_value="10")264        self.expect_expr(265            "InAnon1::InAnon2::var_in_anon", result_type="int", result_value="5"266        )267        self.expect_expr(268            "InAnon1::inline_ns::var_in_anon", result_type="int", result_value="15"269        )270        self.expect_expr(271            "InAnon1::inline_ns::InAnon2::var_in_anon",272            result_type="int",273            result_value="5",274        )275