7158 lines · cpp
1//===- LoopStrengthReduce.cpp - Strength Reduce IVs in Loops --------------===//2//3// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.4// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.5// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception6//7//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//8//9// This transformation analyzes and transforms the induction variables (and10// computations derived from them) into forms suitable for efficient execution11// on the target.12//13// This pass performs a strength reduction on array references inside loops that14// have as one or more of their components the loop induction variable, it15// rewrites expressions to take advantage of scaled-index addressing modes16// available on the target, and it performs a variety of other optimizations17// related to loop induction variables.18//19// Terminology note: this code has a lot of handling for "post-increment" or20// "post-inc" users. This is not talking about post-increment addressing modes;21// it is instead talking about code like this:22//23// %i = phi [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.next, %latch ]24// ...25// %i.next = add %i, 126// %c = icmp eq %i.next, %n27//28// The SCEV for %i is {0,+,1}<%L>. The SCEV for %i.next is {1,+,1}<%L>, however29// it's useful to think about these as the same register, with some uses using30// the value of the register before the add and some using it after. In this31// example, the icmp is a post-increment user, since it uses %i.next, which is32// the value of the induction variable after the increment. The other common33// case of post-increment users is users outside the loop.34//35// TODO: More sophistication in the way Formulae are generated and filtered.36//37// TODO: Handle multiple loops at a time.38//39// TODO: Should the addressing mode BaseGV be changed to a ConstantExpr instead40// of a GlobalValue?41//42// TODO: When truncation is free, truncate ICmp users' operands to make it a43// smaller encoding (on x86 at least).44//45// TODO: When a negated register is used by an add (such as in a list of46// multiple base registers, or as the increment expression in an addrec),47// we may not actually need both reg and (-1 * reg) in registers; the48// negation can be implemented by using a sub instead of an add. The49// lack of support for taking this into consideration when making50// register pressure decisions is partly worked around by the "Special"51// use kind.52//53//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//54 55#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.h"56#include "llvm/ADT/APInt.h"57#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"58#include "llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h"59#include "llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h"60#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"61#include "llvm/ADT/SetVector.h"62#include "llvm/ADT/SmallBitVector.h"63#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"64#include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h"65#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"66#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"67#include "llvm/ADT/iterator_range.h"68#include "llvm/Analysis/AssumptionCache.h"69#include "llvm/Analysis/DomTreeUpdater.h"70#include "llvm/Analysis/IVUsers.h"71#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopAnalysisManager.h"72#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"73#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h"74#include "llvm/Analysis/MemorySSA.h"75#include "llvm/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.h"76#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h"77#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpressions.h"78#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionNormalization.h"79#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionPatternMatch.h"80#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h"81#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h"82#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"83#include "llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h"84#include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h"85#include "llvm/IR/Constant.h"86#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"87#include "llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h"88#include "llvm/IR/DerivedTypes.h"89#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"90#include "llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h"91#include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h"92#include "llvm/IR/InstrTypes.h"93#include "llvm/IR/Instruction.h"94#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"95#include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h"96#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"97#include "llvm/IR/Operator.h"98#include "llvm/IR/Type.h"99#include "llvm/IR/Use.h"100#include "llvm/IR/User.h"101#include "llvm/IR/Value.h"102#include "llvm/IR/ValueHandle.h"103#include "llvm/InitializePasses.h"104#include "llvm/Pass.h"105#include "llvm/Support/Casting.h"106#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"107#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"108#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"109#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"110#include "llvm/Support/MathExtras.h"111#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"112#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"113#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils.h"114#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"115#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"116#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h"117#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h"118#include <algorithm>119#include <cassert>120#include <cstddef>121#include <cstdint>122#include <iterator>123#include <limits>124#include <map>125#include <numeric>126#include <optional>127#include <utility>128 129using namespace llvm;130using namespace SCEVPatternMatch;131 132#define DEBUG_TYPE "loop-reduce"133 134/// MaxIVUsers is an arbitrary threshold that provides an early opportunity for135/// bail out. This threshold is far beyond the number of users that LSR can136/// conceivably solve, so it should not affect generated code, but catches the137/// worst cases before LSR burns too much compile time and stack space.138static const unsigned MaxIVUsers = 200;139 140/// Limit the size of expression that SCEV-based salvaging will attempt to141/// translate into a DIExpression.142/// Choose a maximum size such that debuginfo is not excessively increased and143/// the salvaging is not too expensive for the compiler.144static const unsigned MaxSCEVSalvageExpressionSize = 64;145 146// Cleanup congruent phis after LSR phi expansion.147static cl::opt<bool> EnablePhiElim(148 "enable-lsr-phielim", cl::Hidden, cl::init(true),149 cl::desc("Enable LSR phi elimination"));150 151// The flag adds instruction count to solutions cost comparison.152static cl::opt<bool> InsnsCost(153 "lsr-insns-cost", cl::Hidden, cl::init(true),154 cl::desc("Add instruction count to a LSR cost model"));155 156// Flag to choose how to narrow complex lsr solution157static cl::opt<bool> LSRExpNarrow(158 "lsr-exp-narrow", cl::Hidden, cl::init(false),159 cl::desc("Narrow LSR complex solution using"160 " expectation of registers number"));161 162// Flag to narrow search space by filtering non-optimal formulae with163// the same ScaledReg and Scale.164static cl::opt<bool> FilterSameScaledReg(165 "lsr-filter-same-scaled-reg", cl::Hidden, cl::init(true),166 cl::desc("Narrow LSR search space by filtering non-optimal formulae"167 " with the same ScaledReg and Scale"));168 169static cl::opt<TTI::AddressingModeKind> PreferredAddresingMode(170 "lsr-preferred-addressing-mode", cl::Hidden, cl::init(TTI::AMK_None),171 cl::desc("A flag that overrides the target's preferred addressing mode."),172 cl::values(173 clEnumValN(TTI::AMK_None, "none", "Don't prefer any addressing mode"),174 clEnumValN(TTI::AMK_PreIndexed, "preindexed",175 "Prefer pre-indexed addressing mode"),176 clEnumValN(TTI::AMK_PostIndexed, "postindexed",177 "Prefer post-indexed addressing mode"),178 clEnumValN(TTI::AMK_All, "all", "Consider all addressing modes")));179 180static cl::opt<unsigned> ComplexityLimit(181 "lsr-complexity-limit", cl::Hidden,182 cl::init(std::numeric_limits<uint16_t>::max()),183 cl::desc("LSR search space complexity limit"));184 185static cl::opt<unsigned> SetupCostDepthLimit(186 "lsr-setupcost-depth-limit", cl::Hidden, cl::init(7),187 cl::desc("The limit on recursion depth for LSRs setup cost"));188 189static cl::opt<cl::boolOrDefault> AllowDropSolutionIfLessProfitable(190 "lsr-drop-solution", cl::Hidden,191 cl::desc("Attempt to drop solution if it is less profitable"));192 193static cl::opt<bool> EnableVScaleImmediates(194 "lsr-enable-vscale-immediates", cl::Hidden, cl::init(true),195 cl::desc("Enable analysis of vscale-relative immediates in LSR"));196 197static cl::opt<bool> DropScaledForVScale(198 "lsr-drop-scaled-reg-for-vscale", cl::Hidden, cl::init(true),199 cl::desc("Avoid using scaled registers with vscale-relative addressing"));200 201#ifndef NDEBUG202// Stress test IV chain generation.203static cl::opt<bool> StressIVChain(204 "stress-ivchain", cl::Hidden, cl::init(false),205 cl::desc("Stress test LSR IV chains"));206#else207static bool StressIVChain = false;208#endif209 210namespace {211 212struct MemAccessTy {213 /// Used in situations where the accessed memory type is unknown.214 static const unsigned UnknownAddressSpace =215 std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max();216 217 Type *MemTy = nullptr;218 unsigned AddrSpace = UnknownAddressSpace;219 220 MemAccessTy() = default;221 MemAccessTy(Type *Ty, unsigned AS) : MemTy(Ty), AddrSpace(AS) {}222 223 bool operator==(MemAccessTy Other) const {224 return MemTy == Other.MemTy && AddrSpace == Other.AddrSpace;225 }226 227 bool operator!=(MemAccessTy Other) const { return !(*this == Other); }228 229 static MemAccessTy getUnknown(LLVMContext &Ctx,230 unsigned AS = UnknownAddressSpace) {231 return MemAccessTy(Type::getVoidTy(Ctx), AS);232 }233 234 Type *getType() { return MemTy; }235};236 237/// This class holds data which is used to order reuse candidates.238class RegSortData {239public:240 /// This represents the set of LSRUse indices which reference241 /// a particular register.242 SmallBitVector UsedByIndices;243 244 void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;245 void dump() const;246};247 248// An offset from an address that is either scalable or fixed. Used for249// per-target optimizations of addressing modes.250class Immediate : public details::FixedOrScalableQuantity<Immediate, int64_t> {251 constexpr Immediate(ScalarTy MinVal, bool Scalable)252 : FixedOrScalableQuantity(MinVal, Scalable) {}253 254 constexpr Immediate(const FixedOrScalableQuantity<Immediate, int64_t> &V)255 : FixedOrScalableQuantity(V) {}256 257public:258 constexpr Immediate() = delete;259 260 static constexpr Immediate getFixed(ScalarTy MinVal) {261 return {MinVal, false};262 }263 static constexpr Immediate getScalable(ScalarTy MinVal) {264 return {MinVal, true};265 }266 static constexpr Immediate get(ScalarTy MinVal, bool Scalable) {267 return {MinVal, Scalable};268 }269 static constexpr Immediate getZero() { return {0, false}; }270 static constexpr Immediate getFixedMin() {271 return {std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::min(), false};272 }273 static constexpr Immediate getFixedMax() {274 return {std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max(), false};275 }276 static constexpr Immediate getScalableMin() {277 return {std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::min(), true};278 }279 static constexpr Immediate getScalableMax() {280 return {std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max(), true};281 }282 283 constexpr bool isLessThanZero() const { return Quantity < 0; }284 285 constexpr bool isGreaterThanZero() const { return Quantity > 0; }286 287 constexpr bool isCompatibleImmediate(const Immediate &Imm) const {288 return isZero() || Imm.isZero() || Imm.Scalable == Scalable;289 }290 291 constexpr bool isMin() const {292 return Quantity == std::numeric_limits<ScalarTy>::min();293 }294 295 constexpr bool isMax() const {296 return Quantity == std::numeric_limits<ScalarTy>::max();297 }298 299 // Arithmetic 'operators' that cast to unsigned types first.300 constexpr Immediate addUnsigned(const Immediate &RHS) const {301 assert(isCompatibleImmediate(RHS) && "Incompatible Immediates");302 ScalarTy Value = (uint64_t)Quantity + RHS.getKnownMinValue();303 return {Value, Scalable || RHS.isScalable()};304 }305 306 constexpr Immediate subUnsigned(const Immediate &RHS) const {307 assert(isCompatibleImmediate(RHS) && "Incompatible Immediates");308 ScalarTy Value = (uint64_t)Quantity - RHS.getKnownMinValue();309 return {Value, Scalable || RHS.isScalable()};310 }311 312 // Scale the quantity by a constant without caring about runtime scalability.313 constexpr Immediate mulUnsigned(const ScalarTy RHS) const {314 ScalarTy Value = (uint64_t)Quantity * RHS;315 return {Value, Scalable};316 }317 318 // Helpers for generating SCEVs with vscale terms where needed.319 const SCEV *getSCEV(ScalarEvolution &SE, Type *Ty) const {320 const SCEV *S = SE.getConstant(Ty, Quantity);321 if (Scalable)322 S = SE.getMulExpr(S, SE.getVScale(S->getType()));323 return S;324 }325 326 const SCEV *getNegativeSCEV(ScalarEvolution &SE, Type *Ty) const {327 const SCEV *NegS = SE.getConstant(Ty, -(uint64_t)Quantity);328 if (Scalable)329 NegS = SE.getMulExpr(NegS, SE.getVScale(NegS->getType()));330 return NegS;331 }332 333 const SCEV *getUnknownSCEV(ScalarEvolution &SE, Type *Ty) const {334 const SCEV *SU = SE.getUnknown(ConstantInt::getSigned(Ty, Quantity));335 if (Scalable)336 SU = SE.getMulExpr(SU, SE.getVScale(SU->getType()));337 return SU;338 }339};340 341// This is needed for the Compare type of std::map when Immediate is used342// as a key. We don't need it to be fully correct against any value of vscale,343// just to make sure that vscale-related terms in the map are considered against344// each other rather than being mixed up and potentially missing opportunities.345struct KeyOrderTargetImmediate {346 bool operator()(const Immediate &LHS, const Immediate &RHS) const {347 if (LHS.isScalable() && !RHS.isScalable())348 return false;349 if (!LHS.isScalable() && RHS.isScalable())350 return true;351 return LHS.getKnownMinValue() < RHS.getKnownMinValue();352 }353};354 355// This would be nicer if we could be generic instead of directly using size_t,356// but there doesn't seem to be a type trait for is_orderable or357// is_lessthan_comparable or similar.358struct KeyOrderSizeTAndImmediate {359 bool operator()(const std::pair<size_t, Immediate> &LHS,360 const std::pair<size_t, Immediate> &RHS) const {361 size_t LSize = LHS.first;362 size_t RSize = RHS.first;363 if (LSize != RSize)364 return LSize < RSize;365 return KeyOrderTargetImmediate()(LHS.second, RHS.second);366 }367};368} // end anonymous namespace369 370#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)371void RegSortData::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {372 OS << "[NumUses=" << UsedByIndices.count() << ']';373}374 375LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void RegSortData::dump() const {376 print(errs()); errs() << '\n';377}378#endif379 380namespace {381 382/// Map register candidates to information about how they are used.383class RegUseTracker {384 using RegUsesTy = DenseMap<const SCEV *, RegSortData>;385 386 RegUsesTy RegUsesMap;387 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 16> RegSequence;388 389public:390 void countRegister(const SCEV *Reg, size_t LUIdx);391 void dropRegister(const SCEV *Reg, size_t LUIdx);392 void swapAndDropUse(size_t LUIdx, size_t LastLUIdx);393 394 bool isRegUsedByUsesOtherThan(const SCEV *Reg, size_t LUIdx) const;395 396 const SmallBitVector &getUsedByIndices(const SCEV *Reg) const;397 398 void clear();399 400 using iterator = SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::iterator;401 using const_iterator = SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator;402 403 iterator begin() { return RegSequence.begin(); }404 iterator end() { return RegSequence.end(); }405 const_iterator begin() const { return RegSequence.begin(); }406 const_iterator end() const { return RegSequence.end(); }407};408 409} // end anonymous namespace410 411void412RegUseTracker::countRegister(const SCEV *Reg, size_t LUIdx) {413 std::pair<RegUsesTy::iterator, bool> Pair = RegUsesMap.try_emplace(Reg);414 RegSortData &RSD = Pair.first->second;415 if (Pair.second)416 RegSequence.push_back(Reg);417 RSD.UsedByIndices.resize(std::max(RSD.UsedByIndices.size(), LUIdx + 1));418 RSD.UsedByIndices.set(LUIdx);419}420 421void422RegUseTracker::dropRegister(const SCEV *Reg, size_t LUIdx) {423 RegUsesTy::iterator It = RegUsesMap.find(Reg);424 assert(It != RegUsesMap.end());425 RegSortData &RSD = It->second;426 assert(RSD.UsedByIndices.size() > LUIdx);427 RSD.UsedByIndices.reset(LUIdx);428}429 430void431RegUseTracker::swapAndDropUse(size_t LUIdx, size_t LastLUIdx) {432 assert(LUIdx <= LastLUIdx);433 434 // Update RegUses. The data structure is not optimized for this purpose;435 // we must iterate through it and update each of the bit vectors.436 for (auto &Pair : RegUsesMap) {437 SmallBitVector &UsedByIndices = Pair.second.UsedByIndices;438 if (LUIdx < UsedByIndices.size())439 UsedByIndices[LUIdx] =440 LastLUIdx < UsedByIndices.size() ? UsedByIndices[LastLUIdx] : false;441 UsedByIndices.resize(std::min(UsedByIndices.size(), LastLUIdx));442 }443}444 445bool446RegUseTracker::isRegUsedByUsesOtherThan(const SCEV *Reg, size_t LUIdx) const {447 RegUsesTy::const_iterator I = RegUsesMap.find(Reg);448 if (I == RegUsesMap.end())449 return false;450 const SmallBitVector &UsedByIndices = I->second.UsedByIndices;451 int i = UsedByIndices.find_first();452 if (i == -1) return false;453 if ((size_t)i != LUIdx) return true;454 return UsedByIndices.find_next(i) != -1;455}456 457const SmallBitVector &RegUseTracker::getUsedByIndices(const SCEV *Reg) const {458 RegUsesTy::const_iterator I = RegUsesMap.find(Reg);459 assert(I != RegUsesMap.end() && "Unknown register!");460 return I->second.UsedByIndices;461}462 463void RegUseTracker::clear() {464 RegUsesMap.clear();465 RegSequence.clear();466}467 468namespace {469 470/// This class holds information that describes a formula for computing471/// satisfying a use. It may include broken-out immediates and scaled registers.472struct Formula {473 /// Global base address used for complex addressing.474 GlobalValue *BaseGV = nullptr;475 476 /// Base offset for complex addressing.477 Immediate BaseOffset = Immediate::getZero();478 479 /// Whether any complex addressing has a base register.480 bool HasBaseReg = false;481 482 /// The scale of any complex addressing.483 int64_t Scale = 0;484 485 /// The list of "base" registers for this use. When this is non-empty. The486 /// canonical representation of a formula is487 /// 1. BaseRegs.size > 1 implies ScaledReg != NULL and488 /// 2. ScaledReg != NULL implies Scale != 1 || !BaseRegs.empty().489 /// 3. The reg containing recurrent expr related with currect loop in the490 /// formula should be put in the ScaledReg.491 /// #1 enforces that the scaled register is always used when at least two492 /// registers are needed by the formula: e.g., reg1 + reg2 is reg1 + 1 * reg2.493 /// #2 enforces that 1 * reg is reg.494 /// #3 ensures invariant regs with respect to current loop can be combined495 /// together in LSR codegen.496 /// This invariant can be temporarily broken while building a formula.497 /// However, every formula inserted into the LSRInstance must be in canonical498 /// form.499 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> BaseRegs;500 501 /// The 'scaled' register for this use. This should be non-null when Scale is502 /// not zero.503 const SCEV *ScaledReg = nullptr;504 505 /// An additional constant offset which added near the use. This requires a506 /// temporary register, but the offset itself can live in an add immediate507 /// field rather than a register.508 Immediate UnfoldedOffset = Immediate::getZero();509 510 Formula() = default;511 512 void initialMatch(const SCEV *S, Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE);513 514 bool isCanonical(const Loop &L) const;515 516 void canonicalize(const Loop &L);517 518 bool unscale();519 520 bool hasZeroEnd() const;521 522 bool countsDownToZero() const;523 524 size_t getNumRegs() const;525 Type *getType() const;526 527 void deleteBaseReg(const SCEV *&S);528 529 bool referencesReg(const SCEV *S) const;530 bool hasRegsUsedByUsesOtherThan(size_t LUIdx,531 const RegUseTracker &RegUses) const;532 533 void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;534 void dump() const;535};536 537} // end anonymous namespace538 539/// Recursion helper for initialMatch.540static void DoInitialMatch(const SCEV *S, Loop *L,541 SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *> &Good,542 SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *> &Bad,543 ScalarEvolution &SE) {544 // Collect expressions which properly dominate the loop header.545 if (SE.properlyDominates(S, L->getHeader())) {546 Good.push_back(S);547 return;548 }549 550 // Look at add operands.551 if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S)) {552 for (const SCEV *S : Add->operands())553 DoInitialMatch(S, L, Good, Bad, SE);554 return;555 }556 557 // Look at addrec operands.558 const SCEV *Start, *Step;559 const Loop *ARLoop;560 if (match(S,561 m_scev_AffineAddRec(m_SCEV(Start), m_SCEV(Step), m_Loop(ARLoop))) &&562 !Start->isZero()) {563 DoInitialMatch(Start, L, Good, Bad, SE);564 DoInitialMatch(SE.getAddRecExpr(SE.getConstant(S->getType(), 0), Step,565 // FIXME: AR->getNoWrapFlags()566 ARLoop, SCEV::FlagAnyWrap),567 L, Good, Bad, SE);568 return;569 }570 571 // Handle a multiplication by -1 (negation) if it didn't fold.572 if (const SCEVMulExpr *Mul = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(S))573 if (Mul->getOperand(0)->isAllOnesValue()) {574 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Ops(drop_begin(Mul->operands()));575 const SCEV *NewMul = SE.getMulExpr(Ops);576 577 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> MyGood;578 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> MyBad;579 DoInitialMatch(NewMul, L, MyGood, MyBad, SE);580 const SCEV *NegOne = SE.getSCEV(ConstantInt::getAllOnesValue(581 SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(NewMul->getType())));582 for (const SCEV *S : MyGood)583 Good.push_back(SE.getMulExpr(NegOne, S));584 for (const SCEV *S : MyBad)585 Bad.push_back(SE.getMulExpr(NegOne, S));586 return;587 }588 589 // Ok, we can't do anything interesting. Just stuff the whole thing into a590 // register and hope for the best.591 Bad.push_back(S);592}593 594/// Incorporate loop-variant parts of S into this Formula, attempting to keep595/// all loop-invariant and loop-computable values in a single base register.596void Formula::initialMatch(const SCEV *S, Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE) {597 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Good;598 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Bad;599 DoInitialMatch(S, L, Good, Bad, SE);600 if (!Good.empty()) {601 const SCEV *Sum = SE.getAddExpr(Good);602 if (!Sum->isZero())603 BaseRegs.push_back(Sum);604 HasBaseReg = true;605 }606 if (!Bad.empty()) {607 const SCEV *Sum = SE.getAddExpr(Bad);608 if (!Sum->isZero())609 BaseRegs.push_back(Sum);610 HasBaseReg = true;611 }612 canonicalize(*L);613}614 615static bool containsAddRecDependentOnLoop(const SCEV *S, const Loop &L) {616 return SCEVExprContains(S, [&L](const SCEV *S) {617 return isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S) && (cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)->getLoop() == &L);618 });619}620 621/// Check whether or not this formula satisfies the canonical622/// representation.623/// \see Formula::BaseRegs.624bool Formula::isCanonical(const Loop &L) const {625 assert((Scale == 0 || ScaledReg) &&626 "ScaledReg must be non-null if Scale is non-zero");627 628 if (!ScaledReg)629 return BaseRegs.size() <= 1;630 631 if (Scale != 1)632 return true;633 634 if (Scale == 1 && BaseRegs.empty())635 return false;636 637 if (containsAddRecDependentOnLoop(ScaledReg, L))638 return true;639 640 // If ScaledReg is not a recurrent expr, or it is but its loop is not current641 // loop, meanwhile BaseRegs contains a recurrent expr reg related with current642 // loop, we want to swap the reg in BaseRegs with ScaledReg.643 return none_of(BaseRegs, [&L](const SCEV *S) {644 return containsAddRecDependentOnLoop(S, L);645 });646}647 648/// Helper method to morph a formula into its canonical representation.649/// \see Formula::BaseRegs.650/// Every formula having more than one base register, must use the ScaledReg651/// field. Otherwise, we would have to do special cases everywhere in LSR652/// to treat reg1 + reg2 + ... the same way as reg1 + 1*reg2 + ...653/// On the other hand, 1*reg should be canonicalized into reg.654void Formula::canonicalize(const Loop &L) {655 if (isCanonical(L))656 return;657 658 if (BaseRegs.empty()) {659 // No base reg? Use scale reg with scale = 1 as such.660 assert(ScaledReg && "Expected 1*reg => reg");661 assert(Scale == 1 && "Expected 1*reg => reg");662 BaseRegs.push_back(ScaledReg);663 Scale = 0;664 ScaledReg = nullptr;665 return;666 }667 668 // Keep the invariant sum in BaseRegs and one of the variant sum in ScaledReg.669 if (!ScaledReg) {670 ScaledReg = BaseRegs.pop_back_val();671 Scale = 1;672 }673 674 // If ScaledReg is an invariant with respect to L, find the reg from675 // BaseRegs containing the recurrent expr related with Loop L. Swap the676 // reg with ScaledReg.677 if (!containsAddRecDependentOnLoop(ScaledReg, L)) {678 auto I = find_if(BaseRegs, [&L](const SCEV *S) {679 return containsAddRecDependentOnLoop(S, L);680 });681 if (I != BaseRegs.end())682 std::swap(ScaledReg, *I);683 }684 assert(isCanonical(L) && "Failed to canonicalize?");685}686 687/// Get rid of the scale in the formula.688/// In other words, this method morphes reg1 + 1*reg2 into reg1 + reg2.689/// \return true if it was possible to get rid of the scale, false otherwise.690/// \note After this operation the formula may not be in the canonical form.691bool Formula::unscale() {692 if (Scale != 1)693 return false;694 Scale = 0;695 BaseRegs.push_back(ScaledReg);696 ScaledReg = nullptr;697 return true;698}699 700bool Formula::hasZeroEnd() const {701 if (UnfoldedOffset || BaseOffset)702 return false;703 if (BaseRegs.size() != 1 || ScaledReg)704 return false;705 return true;706}707 708bool Formula::countsDownToZero() const {709 if (!hasZeroEnd())710 return false;711 assert(BaseRegs.size() == 1 && "hasZeroEnd should mean one BaseReg");712 const APInt *StepInt;713 if (!match(BaseRegs[0], m_scev_AffineAddRec(m_SCEV(), m_scev_APInt(StepInt))))714 return false;715 return StepInt->isNegative();716}717 718/// Return the total number of register operands used by this formula. This does719/// not include register uses implied by non-constant addrec strides.720size_t Formula::getNumRegs() const {721 return !!ScaledReg + BaseRegs.size();722}723 724/// Return the type of this formula, if it has one, or null otherwise. This type725/// is meaningless except for the bit size.726Type *Formula::getType() const {727 return !BaseRegs.empty() ? BaseRegs.front()->getType() :728 ScaledReg ? ScaledReg->getType() :729 BaseGV ? BaseGV->getType() :730 nullptr;731}732 733/// Delete the given base reg from the BaseRegs list.734void Formula::deleteBaseReg(const SCEV *&S) {735 if (&S != &BaseRegs.back())736 std::swap(S, BaseRegs.back());737 BaseRegs.pop_back();738}739 740/// Test if this formula references the given register.741bool Formula::referencesReg(const SCEV *S) const {742 return S == ScaledReg || is_contained(BaseRegs, S);743}744 745/// Test whether this formula uses registers which are used by uses other than746/// the use with the given index.747bool Formula::hasRegsUsedByUsesOtherThan(size_t LUIdx,748 const RegUseTracker &RegUses) const {749 if (ScaledReg)750 if (RegUses.isRegUsedByUsesOtherThan(ScaledReg, LUIdx))751 return true;752 for (const SCEV *BaseReg : BaseRegs)753 if (RegUses.isRegUsedByUsesOtherThan(BaseReg, LUIdx))754 return true;755 return false;756}757 758#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)759void Formula::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {760 bool First = true;761 if (BaseGV) {762 if (!First) OS << " + "; else First = false;763 BaseGV->printAsOperand(OS, /*PrintType=*/false);764 }765 if (BaseOffset.isNonZero()) {766 if (!First) OS << " + "; else First = false;767 OS << BaseOffset;768 }769 for (const SCEV *BaseReg : BaseRegs) {770 if (!First) OS << " + "; else First = false;771 OS << "reg(" << *BaseReg << ')';772 }773 if (HasBaseReg && BaseRegs.empty()) {774 if (!First) OS << " + "; else First = false;775 OS << "**error: HasBaseReg**";776 } else if (!HasBaseReg && !BaseRegs.empty()) {777 if (!First) OS << " + "; else First = false;778 OS << "**error: !HasBaseReg**";779 }780 if (Scale != 0) {781 if (!First) OS << " + "; else First = false;782 OS << Scale << "*reg(";783 if (ScaledReg)784 OS << *ScaledReg;785 else786 OS << "<unknown>";787 OS << ')';788 }789 if (UnfoldedOffset.isNonZero()) {790 if (!First) OS << " + ";791 OS << "imm(" << UnfoldedOffset << ')';792 }793}794 795LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void Formula::dump() const {796 print(errs()); errs() << '\n';797}798#endif799 800/// Return true if the given addrec can be sign-extended without changing its801/// value.802static bool isAddRecSExtable(const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR, ScalarEvolution &SE) {803 Type *WideTy =804 IntegerType::get(SE.getContext(), SE.getTypeSizeInBits(AR->getType()) + 1);805 return isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getSignExtendExpr(AR, WideTy));806}807 808/// Return true if the given add can be sign-extended without changing its809/// value.810static bool isAddSExtable(const SCEVAddExpr *A, ScalarEvolution &SE) {811 Type *WideTy =812 IntegerType::get(SE.getContext(), SE.getTypeSizeInBits(A->getType()) + 1);813 return isa<SCEVAddExpr>(SE.getSignExtendExpr(A, WideTy));814}815 816/// Return true if the given mul can be sign-extended without changing its817/// value.818static bool isMulSExtable(const SCEVMulExpr *M, ScalarEvolution &SE) {819 Type *WideTy =820 IntegerType::get(SE.getContext(),821 SE.getTypeSizeInBits(M->getType()) * M->getNumOperands());822 return isa<SCEVMulExpr>(SE.getSignExtendExpr(M, WideTy));823}824 825/// Return an expression for LHS /s RHS, if it can be determined and if the826/// remainder is known to be zero, or null otherwise. If IgnoreSignificantBits827/// is true, expressions like (X * Y) /s Y are simplified to X, ignoring that828/// the multiplication may overflow, which is useful when the result will be829/// used in a context where the most significant bits are ignored.830static const SCEV *getExactSDiv(const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,831 ScalarEvolution &SE,832 bool IgnoreSignificantBits = false) {833 // Handle the trivial case, which works for any SCEV type.834 if (LHS == RHS)835 return SE.getConstant(LHS->getType(), 1);836 837 // Handle a few RHS special cases.838 const SCEVConstant *RC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(RHS);839 if (RC) {840 const APInt &RA = RC->getAPInt();841 // Handle x /s -1 as x * -1, to give ScalarEvolution a chance to do842 // some folding.843 if (RA.isAllOnes()) {844 if (LHS->getType()->isPointerTy())845 return nullptr;846 return SE.getMulExpr(LHS, RC);847 }848 // Handle x /s 1 as x.849 if (RA == 1)850 return LHS;851 }852 853 // Check for a division of a constant by a constant.854 if (const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(LHS)) {855 if (!RC)856 return nullptr;857 const APInt &LA = C->getAPInt();858 const APInt &RA = RC->getAPInt();859 if (LA.srem(RA) != 0)860 return nullptr;861 return SE.getConstant(LA.sdiv(RA));862 }863 864 // Distribute the sdiv over addrec operands, if the addrec doesn't overflow.865 if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(LHS)) {866 if ((IgnoreSignificantBits || isAddRecSExtable(AR, SE)) && AR->isAffine()) {867 const SCEV *Step = getExactSDiv(AR->getStepRecurrence(SE), RHS, SE,868 IgnoreSignificantBits);869 if (!Step) return nullptr;870 const SCEV *Start = getExactSDiv(AR->getStart(), RHS, SE,871 IgnoreSignificantBits);872 if (!Start) return nullptr;873 // FlagNW is independent of the start value, step direction, and is874 // preserved with smaller magnitude steps.875 // FIXME: AR->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNW)876 return SE.getAddRecExpr(Start, Step, AR->getLoop(), SCEV::FlagAnyWrap);877 }878 return nullptr;879 }880 881 // Distribute the sdiv over add operands, if the add doesn't overflow.882 if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(LHS)) {883 if (IgnoreSignificantBits || isAddSExtable(Add, SE)) {884 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> Ops;885 for (const SCEV *S : Add->operands()) {886 const SCEV *Op = getExactSDiv(S, RHS, SE, IgnoreSignificantBits);887 if (!Op) return nullptr;888 Ops.push_back(Op);889 }890 return SE.getAddExpr(Ops);891 }892 return nullptr;893 }894 895 // Check for a multiply operand that we can pull RHS out of.896 if (const SCEVMulExpr *Mul = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(LHS)) {897 if (IgnoreSignificantBits || isMulSExtable(Mul, SE)) {898 // Handle special case C1*X*Y /s C2*X*Y.899 if (const SCEVMulExpr *MulRHS = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(RHS)) {900 if (IgnoreSignificantBits || isMulSExtable(MulRHS, SE)) {901 const SCEVConstant *LC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Mul->getOperand(0));902 const SCEVConstant *RC =903 dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(MulRHS->getOperand(0));904 if (LC && RC) {905 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> LOps(drop_begin(Mul->operands()));906 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> ROps(drop_begin(MulRHS->operands()));907 if (LOps == ROps)908 return getExactSDiv(LC, RC, SE, IgnoreSignificantBits);909 }910 }911 }912 913 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Ops;914 bool Found = false;915 for (const SCEV *S : Mul->operands()) {916 if (!Found)917 if (const SCEV *Q = getExactSDiv(S, RHS, SE,918 IgnoreSignificantBits)) {919 S = Q;920 Found = true;921 }922 Ops.push_back(S);923 }924 return Found ? SE.getMulExpr(Ops) : nullptr;925 }926 return nullptr;927 }928 929 // Otherwise we don't know.930 return nullptr;931}932 933/// If S involves the addition of a constant integer value, return that integer934/// value, and mutate S to point to a new SCEV with that value excluded.935static Immediate ExtractImmediate(const SCEV *&S, ScalarEvolution &SE) {936 const APInt *C;937 if (match(S, m_scev_APInt(C))) {938 if (C->getSignificantBits() <= 64) {939 S = SE.getConstant(S->getType(), 0);940 return Immediate::getFixed(C->getSExtValue());941 }942 } else if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S)) {943 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> NewOps(Add->operands());944 Immediate Result = ExtractImmediate(NewOps.front(), SE);945 if (Result.isNonZero())946 S = SE.getAddExpr(NewOps);947 return Result;948 } else if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {949 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> NewOps(AR->operands());950 Immediate Result = ExtractImmediate(NewOps.front(), SE);951 if (Result.isNonZero())952 S = SE.getAddRecExpr(NewOps, AR->getLoop(),953 // FIXME: AR->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNW)954 SCEV::FlagAnyWrap);955 return Result;956 } else if (EnableVScaleImmediates &&957 match(S, m_scev_Mul(m_scev_APInt(C), m_SCEVVScale()))) {958 S = SE.getConstant(S->getType(), 0);959 return Immediate::getScalable(C->getSExtValue());960 }961 return Immediate::getZero();962}963 964/// If S involves the addition of a GlobalValue address, return that symbol, and965/// mutate S to point to a new SCEV with that value excluded.966static GlobalValue *ExtractSymbol(const SCEV *&S, ScalarEvolution &SE) {967 if (const SCEVUnknown *U = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(S)) {968 if (GlobalValue *GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(U->getValue())) {969 S = SE.getConstant(GV->getType(), 0);970 return GV;971 }972 } else if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S)) {973 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> NewOps(Add->operands());974 GlobalValue *Result = ExtractSymbol(NewOps.back(), SE);975 if (Result)976 S = SE.getAddExpr(NewOps);977 return Result;978 } else if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {979 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> NewOps(AR->operands());980 GlobalValue *Result = ExtractSymbol(NewOps.front(), SE);981 if (Result)982 S = SE.getAddRecExpr(NewOps, AR->getLoop(),983 // FIXME: AR->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNW)984 SCEV::FlagAnyWrap);985 return Result;986 }987 return nullptr;988}989 990/// Returns true if the specified instruction is using the specified value as an991/// address.992static bool isAddressUse(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,993 Instruction *Inst, Value *OperandVal) {994 bool isAddress = isa<LoadInst>(Inst);995 if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(Inst)) {996 if (SI->getPointerOperand() == OperandVal)997 isAddress = true;998 } else if (IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(Inst)) {999 // Addressing modes can also be folded into prefetches and a variety1000 // of intrinsics.1001 switch (II->getIntrinsicID()) {1002 case Intrinsic::memset:1003 case Intrinsic::prefetch:1004 case Intrinsic::masked_load:1005 if (II->getArgOperand(0) == OperandVal)1006 isAddress = true;1007 break;1008 case Intrinsic::masked_store:1009 if (II->getArgOperand(1) == OperandVal)1010 isAddress = true;1011 break;1012 case Intrinsic::memmove:1013 case Intrinsic::memcpy:1014 if (II->getArgOperand(0) == OperandVal ||1015 II->getArgOperand(1) == OperandVal)1016 isAddress = true;1017 break;1018 default: {1019 MemIntrinsicInfo IntrInfo;1020 if (TTI.getTgtMemIntrinsic(II, IntrInfo)) {1021 if (IntrInfo.PtrVal == OperandVal)1022 isAddress = true;1023 }1024 }1025 }1026 } else if (AtomicRMWInst *RMW = dyn_cast<AtomicRMWInst>(Inst)) {1027 if (RMW->getPointerOperand() == OperandVal)1028 isAddress = true;1029 } else if (AtomicCmpXchgInst *CmpX = dyn_cast<AtomicCmpXchgInst>(Inst)) {1030 if (CmpX->getPointerOperand() == OperandVal)1031 isAddress = true;1032 }1033 return isAddress;1034}1035 1036/// Return the type of the memory being accessed.1037static MemAccessTy getAccessType(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,1038 Instruction *Inst, Value *OperandVal) {1039 MemAccessTy AccessTy = MemAccessTy::getUnknown(Inst->getContext());1040 1041 // First get the type of memory being accessed.1042 if (Type *Ty = Inst->getAccessType())1043 AccessTy.MemTy = Ty;1044 1045 // Then get the pointer address space.1046 if (const StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(Inst)) {1047 AccessTy.AddrSpace = SI->getPointerAddressSpace();1048 } else if (const LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(Inst)) {1049 AccessTy.AddrSpace = LI->getPointerAddressSpace();1050 } else if (const AtomicRMWInst *RMW = dyn_cast<AtomicRMWInst>(Inst)) {1051 AccessTy.AddrSpace = RMW->getPointerAddressSpace();1052 } else if (const AtomicCmpXchgInst *CmpX = dyn_cast<AtomicCmpXchgInst>(Inst)) {1053 AccessTy.AddrSpace = CmpX->getPointerAddressSpace();1054 } else if (IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(Inst)) {1055 switch (II->getIntrinsicID()) {1056 case Intrinsic::prefetch:1057 case Intrinsic::memset:1058 AccessTy.AddrSpace = II->getArgOperand(0)->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace();1059 AccessTy.MemTy = OperandVal->getType();1060 break;1061 case Intrinsic::memmove:1062 case Intrinsic::memcpy:1063 AccessTy.AddrSpace = OperandVal->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace();1064 AccessTy.MemTy = OperandVal->getType();1065 break;1066 case Intrinsic::masked_load:1067 AccessTy.AddrSpace =1068 II->getArgOperand(0)->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace();1069 break;1070 case Intrinsic::masked_store:1071 AccessTy.AddrSpace =1072 II->getArgOperand(1)->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace();1073 break;1074 default: {1075 MemIntrinsicInfo IntrInfo;1076 if (TTI.getTgtMemIntrinsic(II, IntrInfo) && IntrInfo.PtrVal) {1077 AccessTy.AddrSpace1078 = IntrInfo.PtrVal->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace();1079 }1080 1081 break;1082 }1083 }1084 }1085 1086 return AccessTy;1087}1088 1089/// Return true if this AddRec is already a phi in its loop.1090static bool isExistingPhi(const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR, ScalarEvolution &SE) {1091 for (PHINode &PN : AR->getLoop()->getHeader()->phis()) {1092 if (SE.isSCEVable(PN.getType()) &&1093 (SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(PN.getType()) ==1094 SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(AR->getType())) &&1095 SE.getSCEV(&PN) == AR)1096 return true;1097 }1098 return false;1099}1100 1101/// Check if expanding this expression is likely to incur significant cost. This1102/// is tricky because SCEV doesn't track which expressions are actually computed1103/// by the current IR.1104///1105/// We currently allow expansion of IV increments that involve adds,1106/// multiplication by constants, and AddRecs from existing phis.1107///1108/// TODO: Allow UDivExpr if we can find an existing IV increment that is an1109/// obvious multiple of the UDivExpr.1110static bool isHighCostExpansion(const SCEV *S,1111 SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV*> &Processed,1112 ScalarEvolution &SE) {1113 // Zero/One operand expressions1114 switch (S->getSCEVType()) {1115 case scUnknown:1116 case scConstant:1117 case scVScale:1118 return false;1119 case scTruncate:1120 return isHighCostExpansion(cast<SCEVTruncateExpr>(S)->getOperand(),1121 Processed, SE);1122 case scZeroExtend:1123 return isHighCostExpansion(cast<SCEVZeroExtendExpr>(S)->getOperand(),1124 Processed, SE);1125 case scSignExtend:1126 return isHighCostExpansion(cast<SCEVSignExtendExpr>(S)->getOperand(),1127 Processed, SE);1128 default:1129 break;1130 }1131 1132 if (!Processed.insert(S).second)1133 return false;1134 1135 if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S)) {1136 for (const SCEV *S : Add->operands()) {1137 if (isHighCostExpansion(S, Processed, SE))1138 return true;1139 }1140 return false;1141 }1142 1143 const SCEV *Op0, *Op1;1144 if (match(S, m_scev_Mul(m_SCEV(Op0), m_SCEV(Op1)))) {1145 // Multiplication by a constant is ok1146 if (isa<SCEVConstant>(Op0))1147 return isHighCostExpansion(Op1, Processed, SE);1148 1149 // If we have the value of one operand, check if an existing1150 // multiplication already generates this expression.1151 if (const auto *U = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(Op1)) {1152 Value *UVal = U->getValue();1153 for (User *UR : UVal->users()) {1154 // If U is a constant, it may be used by a ConstantExpr.1155 Instruction *UI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(UR);1156 if (UI && UI->getOpcode() == Instruction::Mul &&1157 SE.isSCEVable(UI->getType())) {1158 return SE.getSCEV(UI) == S;1159 }1160 }1161 }1162 }1163 1164 if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {1165 if (isExistingPhi(AR, SE))1166 return false;1167 }1168 1169 // Fow now, consider any other type of expression (div/mul/min/max) high cost.1170 return true;1171}1172 1173namespace {1174 1175class LSRUse;1176 1177} // end anonymous namespace1178 1179/// Check if the addressing mode defined by \p F is completely1180/// folded in \p LU at isel time.1181/// This includes address-mode folding and special icmp tricks.1182/// This function returns true if \p LU can accommodate what \p F1183/// defines and up to 1 base + 1 scaled + offset.1184/// In other words, if \p F has several base registers, this function may1185/// still return true. Therefore, users still need to account for1186/// additional base registers and/or unfolded offsets to derive an1187/// accurate cost model.1188static bool isAMCompletelyFolded(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,1189 const LSRUse &LU, const Formula &F);1190 1191// Get the cost of the scaling factor used in F for LU.1192static InstructionCost getScalingFactorCost(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,1193 const LSRUse &LU, const Formula &F,1194 const Loop &L);1195 1196namespace {1197 1198/// This class is used to measure and compare candidate formulae.1199class Cost {1200 const Loop *L = nullptr;1201 ScalarEvolution *SE = nullptr;1202 const TargetTransformInfo *TTI = nullptr;1203 TargetTransformInfo::LSRCost C;1204 TTI::AddressingModeKind AMK = TTI::AMK_None;1205 1206public:1207 Cost() = delete;1208 Cost(const Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE, const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,1209 TTI::AddressingModeKind AMK) :1210 L(L), SE(&SE), TTI(&TTI), AMK(AMK) {1211 C.Insns = 0;1212 C.NumRegs = 0;1213 C.AddRecCost = 0;1214 C.NumIVMuls = 0;1215 C.NumBaseAdds = 0;1216 C.ImmCost = 0;1217 C.SetupCost = 0;1218 C.ScaleCost = 0;1219 }1220 1221 bool isLess(const Cost &Other) const;1222 1223 void Lose();1224 1225#ifndef NDEBUG1226 // Once any of the metrics loses, they must all remain losers.1227 bool isValid() {1228 return ((C.Insns | C.NumRegs | C.AddRecCost | C.NumIVMuls | C.NumBaseAdds1229 | C.ImmCost | C.SetupCost | C.ScaleCost) != ~0u)1230 || ((C.Insns & C.NumRegs & C.AddRecCost & C.NumIVMuls & C.NumBaseAdds1231 & C.ImmCost & C.SetupCost & C.ScaleCost) == ~0u);1232 }1233#endif1234 1235 bool isLoser() {1236 assert(isValid() && "invalid cost");1237 return C.NumRegs == ~0u;1238 }1239 1240 void RateFormula(const Formula &F, SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> &Regs,1241 const DenseSet<const SCEV *> &VisitedRegs, const LSRUse &LU,1242 bool HardwareLoopProfitable,1243 SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> *LoserRegs = nullptr);1244 1245 void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;1246 void dump() const;1247 1248private:1249 void RateRegister(const Formula &F, const SCEV *Reg,1250 SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> &Regs, const LSRUse &LU,1251 bool HardwareLoopProfitable);1252 void RatePrimaryRegister(const Formula &F, const SCEV *Reg,1253 SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> &Regs,1254 const LSRUse &LU, bool HardwareLoopProfitable,1255 SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> *LoserRegs);1256};1257 1258/// An operand value in an instruction which is to be replaced with some1259/// equivalent, possibly strength-reduced, replacement.1260struct LSRFixup {1261 /// The instruction which will be updated.1262 Instruction *UserInst = nullptr;1263 1264 /// The operand of the instruction which will be replaced. The operand may be1265 /// used more than once; every instance will be replaced.1266 Value *OperandValToReplace = nullptr;1267 1268 /// If this user is to use the post-incremented value of an induction1269 /// variable, this set is non-empty and holds the loops associated with the1270 /// induction variable.1271 PostIncLoopSet PostIncLoops;1272 1273 /// A constant offset to be added to the LSRUse expression. This allows1274 /// multiple fixups to share the same LSRUse with different offsets, for1275 /// example in an unrolled loop.1276 Immediate Offset = Immediate::getZero();1277 1278 LSRFixup() = default;1279 1280 bool isUseFullyOutsideLoop(const Loop *L) const;1281 1282 void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;1283 void dump() const;1284};1285 1286/// This class holds the state that LSR keeps for each use in IVUsers, as well1287/// as uses invented by LSR itself. It includes information about what kinds of1288/// things can be folded into the user, information about the user itself, and1289/// information about how the use may be satisfied. TODO: Represent multiple1290/// users of the same expression in common?1291class LSRUse {1292 DenseSet<SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4>> Uniquifier;1293 1294public:1295 /// An enum for a kind of use, indicating what types of scaled and immediate1296 /// operands it might support.1297 enum KindType {1298 Basic, ///< A normal use, with no folding.1299 Special, ///< A special case of basic, allowing -1 scales.1300 Address, ///< An address use; folding according to TargetLowering1301 ICmpZero ///< An equality icmp with both operands folded into one.1302 // TODO: Add a generic icmp too?1303 };1304 1305 using SCEVUseKindPair = PointerIntPair<const SCEV *, 2, KindType>;1306 1307 KindType Kind;1308 MemAccessTy AccessTy;1309 1310 /// The list of operands which are to be replaced.1311 SmallVector<LSRFixup, 8> Fixups;1312 1313 /// Keep track of the min and max offsets of the fixups.1314 Immediate MinOffset = Immediate::getFixedMax();1315 Immediate MaxOffset = Immediate::getFixedMin();1316 1317 /// This records whether all of the fixups using this LSRUse are outside of1318 /// the loop, in which case some special-case heuristics may be used.1319 bool AllFixupsOutsideLoop = true;1320 1321 /// This records whether all of the fixups using this LSRUse are unconditional1322 /// within the loop, meaning they will be executed on every path to the loop1323 /// latch. This includes fixups before early exits.1324 bool AllFixupsUnconditional = true;1325 1326 /// RigidFormula is set to true to guarantee that this use will be associated1327 /// with a single formula--the one that initially matched. Some SCEV1328 /// expressions cannot be expanded. This allows LSR to consider the registers1329 /// used by those expressions without the need to expand them later after1330 /// changing the formula.1331 bool RigidFormula = false;1332 1333 /// This records the widest use type for any fixup using this1334 /// LSRUse. FindUseWithSimilarFormula can't consider uses with different max1335 /// fixup widths to be equivalent, because the narrower one may be relying on1336 /// the implicit truncation to truncate away bogus bits.1337 Type *WidestFixupType = nullptr;1338 1339 /// A list of ways to build a value that can satisfy this user. After the1340 /// list is populated, one of these is selected heuristically and used to1341 /// formulate a replacement for OperandValToReplace in UserInst.1342 SmallVector<Formula, 12> Formulae;1343 1344 /// The set of register candidates used by all formulae in this LSRUse.1345 SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 4> Regs;1346 1347 LSRUse(KindType K, MemAccessTy AT) : Kind(K), AccessTy(AT) {}1348 1349 LSRFixup &getNewFixup() {1350 Fixups.push_back(LSRFixup());1351 return Fixups.back();1352 }1353 1354 void pushFixup(LSRFixup &f) {1355 Fixups.push_back(f);1356 if (Immediate::isKnownGT(f.Offset, MaxOffset))1357 MaxOffset = f.Offset;1358 if (Immediate::isKnownLT(f.Offset, MinOffset))1359 MinOffset = f.Offset;1360 }1361 1362 bool HasFormulaWithSameRegs(const Formula &F) const;1363 float getNotSelectedProbability(const SCEV *Reg) const;1364 bool InsertFormula(const Formula &F, const Loop &L);1365 void DeleteFormula(Formula &F);1366 void RecomputeRegs(size_t LUIdx, RegUseTracker &Reguses);1367 1368 void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;1369 void dump() const;1370};1371 1372} // end anonymous namespace1373 1374static bool isAMCompletelyFolded(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,1375 LSRUse::KindType Kind, MemAccessTy AccessTy,1376 GlobalValue *BaseGV, Immediate BaseOffset,1377 bool HasBaseReg, int64_t Scale,1378 Instruction *Fixup = nullptr);1379 1380static unsigned getSetupCost(const SCEV *Reg, unsigned Depth) {1381 if (isa<SCEVUnknown>(Reg) || isa<SCEVConstant>(Reg))1382 return 1;1383 if (Depth == 0)1384 return 0;1385 if (const auto *S = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Reg))1386 return getSetupCost(S->getStart(), Depth - 1);1387 if (auto S = dyn_cast<SCEVIntegralCastExpr>(Reg))1388 return getSetupCost(S->getOperand(), Depth - 1);1389 if (auto S = dyn_cast<SCEVNAryExpr>(Reg))1390 return std::accumulate(S->operands().begin(), S->operands().end(), 0,1391 [&](unsigned i, const SCEV *Reg) {1392 return i + getSetupCost(Reg, Depth - 1);1393 });1394 if (auto S = dyn_cast<SCEVUDivExpr>(Reg))1395 return getSetupCost(S->getLHS(), Depth - 1) +1396 getSetupCost(S->getRHS(), Depth - 1);1397 return 0;1398}1399 1400/// Tally up interesting quantities from the given register.1401void Cost::RateRegister(const Formula &F, const SCEV *Reg,1402 SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> &Regs, const LSRUse &LU,1403 bool HardwareLoopProfitable) {1404 if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Reg)) {1405 // If this is an addrec for another loop, it should be an invariant1406 // with respect to L since L is the innermost loop (at least1407 // for now LSR only handles innermost loops).1408 if (AR->getLoop() != L) {1409 // If the AddRec exists, consider it's register free and leave it alone.1410 if (isExistingPhi(AR, *SE) && !(AMK & TTI::AMK_PostIndexed))1411 return;1412 1413 // It is bad to allow LSR for current loop to add induction variables1414 // for its sibling loops.1415 if (!AR->getLoop()->contains(L)) {1416 Lose();1417 return;1418 }1419 1420 // Otherwise, it will be an invariant with respect to Loop L.1421 ++C.NumRegs;1422 return;1423 }1424 1425 unsigned LoopCost = 1;1426 if (TTI->isIndexedLoadLegal(TTI->MIM_PostInc, AR->getType()) ||1427 TTI->isIndexedStoreLegal(TTI->MIM_PostInc, AR->getType())) {1428 const SCEV *Start;1429 const APInt *Step;1430 if (match(AR, m_scev_AffineAddRec(m_SCEV(Start), m_scev_APInt(Step)))) {1431 // If the step size matches the base offset, we could use pre-indexed1432 // addressing.1433 bool CanPreIndex = (AMK & TTI::AMK_PreIndexed) &&1434 F.BaseOffset.isFixed() &&1435 *Step == F.BaseOffset.getFixedValue();1436 bool CanPostIndex = (AMK & TTI::AMK_PostIndexed) &&1437 !isa<SCEVConstant>(Start) &&1438 SE->isLoopInvariant(Start, L);1439 // We can only pre or post index when the load/store is unconditional.1440 if ((CanPreIndex || CanPostIndex) && LU.AllFixupsUnconditional)1441 LoopCost = 0;1442 }1443 }1444 1445 // If the loop counts down to zero and we'll be using a hardware loop then1446 // the addrec will be combined into the hardware loop instruction.1447 if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero && F.countsDownToZero() &&1448 HardwareLoopProfitable)1449 LoopCost = 0;1450 C.AddRecCost += LoopCost;1451 1452 // Add the step value register, if it needs one.1453 // TODO: The non-affine case isn't precisely modeled here.1454 if (!AR->isAffine() || !isa<SCEVConstant>(AR->getOperand(1))) {1455 if (!Regs.count(AR->getOperand(1))) {1456 RateRegister(F, AR->getOperand(1), Regs, LU, HardwareLoopProfitable);1457 if (isLoser())1458 return;1459 }1460 }1461 }1462 ++C.NumRegs;1463 1464 // Rough heuristic; favor registers which don't require extra setup1465 // instructions in the preheader.1466 C.SetupCost += getSetupCost(Reg, SetupCostDepthLimit);1467 // Ensure we don't, even with the recusion limit, produce invalid costs.1468 C.SetupCost = std::min<unsigned>(C.SetupCost, 1 << 16);1469 1470 C.NumIVMuls += isa<SCEVMulExpr>(Reg) &&1471 SE->hasComputableLoopEvolution(Reg, L);1472}1473 1474/// Record this register in the set. If we haven't seen it before, rate1475/// it. Optional LoserRegs provides a way to declare any formula that refers to1476/// one of those regs an instant loser.1477void Cost::RatePrimaryRegister(const Formula &F, const SCEV *Reg,1478 SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> &Regs,1479 const LSRUse &LU, bool HardwareLoopProfitable,1480 SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> *LoserRegs) {1481 if (LoserRegs && LoserRegs->count(Reg)) {1482 Lose();1483 return;1484 }1485 if (Regs.insert(Reg).second) {1486 RateRegister(F, Reg, Regs, LU, HardwareLoopProfitable);1487 if (LoserRegs && isLoser())1488 LoserRegs->insert(Reg);1489 }1490}1491 1492void Cost::RateFormula(const Formula &F, SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> &Regs,1493 const DenseSet<const SCEV *> &VisitedRegs,1494 const LSRUse &LU, bool HardwareLoopProfitable,1495 SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> *LoserRegs) {1496 if (isLoser())1497 return;1498 assert(F.isCanonical(*L) && "Cost is accurate only for canonical formula");1499 // Tally up the registers.1500 unsigned PrevAddRecCost = C.AddRecCost;1501 unsigned PrevNumRegs = C.NumRegs;1502 unsigned PrevNumBaseAdds = C.NumBaseAdds;1503 if (const SCEV *ScaledReg = F.ScaledReg) {1504 if (VisitedRegs.count(ScaledReg)) {1505 Lose();1506 return;1507 }1508 RatePrimaryRegister(F, ScaledReg, Regs, LU, HardwareLoopProfitable,1509 LoserRegs);1510 if (isLoser())1511 return;1512 }1513 for (const SCEV *BaseReg : F.BaseRegs) {1514 if (VisitedRegs.count(BaseReg)) {1515 Lose();1516 return;1517 }1518 RatePrimaryRegister(F, BaseReg, Regs, LU, HardwareLoopProfitable,1519 LoserRegs);1520 if (isLoser())1521 return;1522 }1523 1524 // Determine how many (unfolded) adds we'll need inside the loop.1525 size_t NumBaseParts = F.getNumRegs();1526 if (NumBaseParts > 1)1527 // Do not count the base and a possible second register if the target1528 // allows to fold 2 registers.1529 C.NumBaseAdds +=1530 NumBaseParts - (1 + (F.Scale && isAMCompletelyFolded(*TTI, LU, F)));1531 C.NumBaseAdds += (F.UnfoldedOffset.isNonZero());1532 1533 // Accumulate non-free scaling amounts.1534 C.ScaleCost += getScalingFactorCost(*TTI, LU, F, *L).getValue();1535 1536 // Tally up the non-zero immediates.1537 for (const LSRFixup &Fixup : LU.Fixups) {1538 if (Fixup.Offset.isCompatibleImmediate(F.BaseOffset)) {1539 Immediate Offset = Fixup.Offset.addUnsigned(F.BaseOffset);1540 if (F.BaseGV)1541 C.ImmCost += 64; // Handle symbolic values conservatively.1542 // TODO: This should probably be the pointer size.1543 else if (Offset.isNonZero())1544 C.ImmCost +=1545 APInt(64, Offset.getKnownMinValue(), true).getSignificantBits();1546 1547 // Check with target if this offset with this instruction is1548 // specifically not supported.1549 if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::Address && Offset.isNonZero() &&1550 !isAMCompletelyFolded(*TTI, LSRUse::Address, LU.AccessTy, F.BaseGV,1551 Offset, F.HasBaseReg, F.Scale, Fixup.UserInst))1552 C.NumBaseAdds++;1553 } else {1554 // Incompatible immediate type, increase cost to avoid using1555 C.ImmCost += 2048;1556 }1557 }1558 1559 // If we don't count instruction cost exit here.1560 if (!InsnsCost) {1561 assert(isValid() && "invalid cost");1562 return;1563 }1564 1565 // Treat every new register that exceeds TTI.getNumberOfRegisters() - 1 as1566 // additional instruction (at least fill).1567 // TODO: Need distinguish register class?1568 unsigned TTIRegNum = TTI->getNumberOfRegisters(1569 TTI->getRegisterClassForType(false, F.getType())) - 1;1570 if (C.NumRegs > TTIRegNum) {1571 // Cost already exceeded TTIRegNum, then only newly added register can add1572 // new instructions.1573 if (PrevNumRegs > TTIRegNum)1574 C.Insns += (C.NumRegs - PrevNumRegs);1575 else1576 C.Insns += (C.NumRegs - TTIRegNum);1577 }1578 1579 // If ICmpZero formula ends with not 0, it could not be replaced by1580 // just add or sub. We'll need to compare final result of AddRec.1581 // That means we'll need an additional instruction. But if the target can1582 // macro-fuse a compare with a branch, don't count this extra instruction.1583 // For -10 + {0, +, 1}:1584 // i = i + 1;1585 // cmp i, 101586 //1587 // For {-10, +, 1}:1588 // i = i + 1;1589 if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero && !F.hasZeroEnd() &&1590 !TTI->canMacroFuseCmp())1591 C.Insns++;1592 // Each new AddRec adds 1 instruction to calculation.1593 C.Insns += (C.AddRecCost - PrevAddRecCost);1594 1595 // BaseAdds adds instructions for unfolded registers.1596 if (LU.Kind != LSRUse::ICmpZero)1597 C.Insns += C.NumBaseAdds - PrevNumBaseAdds;1598 assert(isValid() && "invalid cost");1599}1600 1601/// Set this cost to a losing value.1602void Cost::Lose() {1603 C.Insns = std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max();1604 C.NumRegs = std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max();1605 C.AddRecCost = std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max();1606 C.NumIVMuls = std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max();1607 C.NumBaseAdds = std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max();1608 C.ImmCost = std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max();1609 C.SetupCost = std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max();1610 C.ScaleCost = std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max();1611}1612 1613/// Choose the lower cost.1614bool Cost::isLess(const Cost &Other) const {1615 if (InsnsCost.getNumOccurrences() > 0 && InsnsCost &&1616 C.Insns != Other.C.Insns)1617 return C.Insns < Other.C.Insns;1618 return TTI->isLSRCostLess(C, Other.C);1619}1620 1621#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)1622void Cost::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {1623 if (InsnsCost)1624 OS << C.Insns << " instruction" << (C.Insns == 1 ? " " : "s ");1625 OS << C.NumRegs << " reg" << (C.NumRegs == 1 ? "" : "s");1626 if (C.AddRecCost != 0)1627 OS << ", with addrec cost " << C.AddRecCost;1628 if (C.NumIVMuls != 0)1629 OS << ", plus " << C.NumIVMuls << " IV mul"1630 << (C.NumIVMuls == 1 ? "" : "s");1631 if (C.NumBaseAdds != 0)1632 OS << ", plus " << C.NumBaseAdds << " base add"1633 << (C.NumBaseAdds == 1 ? "" : "s");1634 if (C.ScaleCost != 0)1635 OS << ", plus " << C.ScaleCost << " scale cost";1636 if (C.ImmCost != 0)1637 OS << ", plus " << C.ImmCost << " imm cost";1638 if (C.SetupCost != 0)1639 OS << ", plus " << C.SetupCost << " setup cost";1640}1641 1642LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void Cost::dump() const {1643 print(errs()); errs() << '\n';1644}1645#endif1646 1647/// Test whether this fixup always uses its value outside of the given loop.1648bool LSRFixup::isUseFullyOutsideLoop(const Loop *L) const {1649 // PHI nodes use their value in their incoming blocks.1650 if (const PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(UserInst)) {1651 for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)1652 if (PN->getIncomingValue(i) == OperandValToReplace &&1653 L->contains(PN->getIncomingBlock(i)))1654 return false;1655 return true;1656 }1657 1658 return !L->contains(UserInst);1659}1660 1661#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)1662void LSRFixup::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {1663 OS << "UserInst=";1664 // Store is common and interesting enough to be worth special-casing.1665 if (StoreInst *Store = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(UserInst)) {1666 OS << "store ";1667 Store->getOperand(0)->printAsOperand(OS, /*PrintType=*/false);1668 } else if (UserInst->getType()->isVoidTy())1669 OS << UserInst->getOpcodeName();1670 else1671 UserInst->printAsOperand(OS, /*PrintType=*/false);1672 1673 OS << ", OperandValToReplace=";1674 OperandValToReplace->printAsOperand(OS, /*PrintType=*/false);1675 1676 for (const Loop *PIL : PostIncLoops) {1677 OS << ", PostIncLoop=";1678 PIL->getHeader()->printAsOperand(OS, /*PrintType=*/false);1679 }1680 1681 if (Offset.isNonZero())1682 OS << ", Offset=" << Offset;1683}1684 1685LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void LSRFixup::dump() const {1686 print(errs()); errs() << '\n';1687}1688#endif1689 1690/// Test whether this use as a formula which has the same registers as the given1691/// formula.1692bool LSRUse::HasFormulaWithSameRegs(const Formula &F) const {1693 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Key = F.BaseRegs;1694 if (F.ScaledReg) Key.push_back(F.ScaledReg);1695 // Unstable sort by host order ok, because this is only used for uniquifying.1696 llvm::sort(Key);1697 return Uniquifier.count(Key);1698}1699 1700/// The function returns a probability of selecting formula without Reg.1701float LSRUse::getNotSelectedProbability(const SCEV *Reg) const {1702 unsigned FNum = 0;1703 for (const Formula &F : Formulae)1704 if (F.referencesReg(Reg))1705 FNum++;1706 return ((float)(Formulae.size() - FNum)) / Formulae.size();1707}1708 1709/// If the given formula has not yet been inserted, add it to the list, and1710/// return true. Return false otherwise. The formula must be in canonical form.1711bool LSRUse::InsertFormula(const Formula &F, const Loop &L) {1712 assert(F.isCanonical(L) && "Invalid canonical representation");1713 1714 if (!Formulae.empty() && RigidFormula)1715 return false;1716 1717 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Key = F.BaseRegs;1718 if (F.ScaledReg) Key.push_back(F.ScaledReg);1719 // Unstable sort by host order ok, because this is only used for uniquifying.1720 llvm::sort(Key);1721 1722 if (!Uniquifier.insert(Key).second)1723 return false;1724 1725 // Using a register to hold the value of 0 is not profitable.1726 assert((!F.ScaledReg || !F.ScaledReg->isZero()) &&1727 "Zero allocated in a scaled register!");1728#ifndef NDEBUG1729 for (const SCEV *BaseReg : F.BaseRegs)1730 assert(!BaseReg->isZero() && "Zero allocated in a base register!");1731#endif1732 1733 // Add the formula to the list.1734 Formulae.push_back(F);1735 1736 // Record registers now being used by this use.1737 Regs.insert_range(F.BaseRegs);1738 if (F.ScaledReg)1739 Regs.insert(F.ScaledReg);1740 1741 return true;1742}1743 1744/// Remove the given formula from this use's list.1745void LSRUse::DeleteFormula(Formula &F) {1746 if (&F != &Formulae.back())1747 std::swap(F, Formulae.back());1748 Formulae.pop_back();1749}1750 1751/// Recompute the Regs field, and update RegUses.1752void LSRUse::RecomputeRegs(size_t LUIdx, RegUseTracker &RegUses) {1753 // Now that we've filtered out some formulae, recompute the Regs set.1754 SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 4> OldRegs = std::move(Regs);1755 Regs.clear();1756 for (const Formula &F : Formulae) {1757 if (F.ScaledReg) Regs.insert(F.ScaledReg);1758 Regs.insert_range(F.BaseRegs);1759 }1760 1761 // Update the RegTracker.1762 for (const SCEV *S : OldRegs)1763 if (!Regs.count(S))1764 RegUses.dropRegister(S, LUIdx);1765}1766 1767#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)1768void LSRUse::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {1769 OS << "LSR Use: Kind=";1770 switch (Kind) {1771 case Basic: OS << "Basic"; break;1772 case Special: OS << "Special"; break;1773 case ICmpZero: OS << "ICmpZero"; break;1774 case Address:1775 OS << "Address of ";1776 if (AccessTy.MemTy->isPointerTy())1777 OS << "pointer"; // the full pointer type could be really verbose1778 else {1779 OS << *AccessTy.MemTy;1780 }1781 1782 OS << " in addrspace(" << AccessTy.AddrSpace << ')';1783 }1784 1785 OS << ", Offsets={";1786 bool NeedComma = false;1787 for (const LSRFixup &Fixup : Fixups) {1788 if (NeedComma) OS << ',';1789 OS << Fixup.Offset;1790 NeedComma = true;1791 }1792 OS << '}';1793 1794 if (AllFixupsOutsideLoop)1795 OS << ", all-fixups-outside-loop";1796 1797 if (AllFixupsUnconditional)1798 OS << ", all-fixups-unconditional";1799 1800 if (WidestFixupType)1801 OS << ", widest fixup type: " << *WidestFixupType;1802}1803 1804LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void LSRUse::dump() const {1805 print(errs()); errs() << '\n';1806}1807#endif1808 1809static bool isAMCompletelyFolded(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,1810 LSRUse::KindType Kind, MemAccessTy AccessTy,1811 GlobalValue *BaseGV, Immediate BaseOffset,1812 bool HasBaseReg, int64_t Scale,1813 Instruction *Fixup /* = nullptr */) {1814 switch (Kind) {1815 case LSRUse::Address: {1816 int64_t FixedOffset =1817 BaseOffset.isScalable() ? 0 : BaseOffset.getFixedValue();1818 int64_t ScalableOffset =1819 BaseOffset.isScalable() ? BaseOffset.getKnownMinValue() : 0;1820 return TTI.isLegalAddressingMode(AccessTy.MemTy, BaseGV, FixedOffset,1821 HasBaseReg, Scale, AccessTy.AddrSpace,1822 Fixup, ScalableOffset);1823 }1824 case LSRUse::ICmpZero:1825 // There's not even a target hook for querying whether it would be legal to1826 // fold a GV into an ICmp.1827 if (BaseGV)1828 return false;1829 1830 // ICmp only has two operands; don't allow more than two non-trivial parts.1831 if (Scale != 0 && HasBaseReg && BaseOffset.isNonZero())1832 return false;1833 1834 // ICmp only supports no scale or a -1 scale, as we can "fold" a -1 scale by1835 // putting the scaled register in the other operand of the icmp.1836 if (Scale != 0 && Scale != -1)1837 return false;1838 1839 // If we have low-level target information, ask the target if it can fold an1840 // integer immediate on an icmp.1841 if (BaseOffset.isNonZero()) {1842 // We don't have an interface to query whether the target supports1843 // icmpzero against scalable quantities yet.1844 if (BaseOffset.isScalable())1845 return false;1846 1847 // We have one of:1848 // ICmpZero BaseReg + BaseOffset => ICmp BaseReg, -BaseOffset1849 // ICmpZero -1*ScaleReg + BaseOffset => ICmp ScaleReg, BaseOffset1850 // Offs is the ICmp immediate.1851 if (Scale == 0)1852 // The cast does the right thing with1853 // std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::min().1854 BaseOffset = BaseOffset.getFixed(-(uint64_t)BaseOffset.getFixedValue());1855 return TTI.isLegalICmpImmediate(BaseOffset.getFixedValue());1856 }1857 1858 // ICmpZero BaseReg + -1*ScaleReg => ICmp BaseReg, ScaleReg1859 return true;1860 1861 case LSRUse::Basic:1862 // Only handle single-register values.1863 return !BaseGV && Scale == 0 && BaseOffset.isZero();1864 1865 case LSRUse::Special:1866 // Special case Basic to handle -1 scales.1867 return !BaseGV && (Scale == 0 || Scale == -1) && BaseOffset.isZero();1868 }1869 1870 llvm_unreachable("Invalid LSRUse Kind!");1871}1872 1873static bool isAMCompletelyFolded(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,1874 Immediate MinOffset, Immediate MaxOffset,1875 LSRUse::KindType Kind, MemAccessTy AccessTy,1876 GlobalValue *BaseGV, Immediate BaseOffset,1877 bool HasBaseReg, int64_t Scale) {1878 if (BaseOffset.isNonZero() &&1879 (BaseOffset.isScalable() != MinOffset.isScalable() ||1880 BaseOffset.isScalable() != MaxOffset.isScalable()))1881 return false;1882 // Check for overflow.1883 int64_t Base = BaseOffset.getKnownMinValue();1884 int64_t Min = MinOffset.getKnownMinValue();1885 int64_t Max = MaxOffset.getKnownMinValue();1886 if (((int64_t)((uint64_t)Base + Min) > Base) != (Min > 0))1887 return false;1888 MinOffset = Immediate::get((uint64_t)Base + Min, MinOffset.isScalable());1889 if (((int64_t)((uint64_t)Base + Max) > Base) != (Max > 0))1890 return false;1891 MaxOffset = Immediate::get((uint64_t)Base + Max, MaxOffset.isScalable());1892 1893 return isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, Kind, AccessTy, BaseGV, MinOffset,1894 HasBaseReg, Scale) &&1895 isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, Kind, AccessTy, BaseGV, MaxOffset,1896 HasBaseReg, Scale);1897}1898 1899static bool isAMCompletelyFolded(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,1900 Immediate MinOffset, Immediate MaxOffset,1901 LSRUse::KindType Kind, MemAccessTy AccessTy,1902 const Formula &F, const Loop &L) {1903 // For the purpose of isAMCompletelyFolded either having a canonical formula1904 // or a scale not equal to zero is correct.1905 // Problems may arise from non canonical formulae having a scale == 0.1906 // Strictly speaking it would best to just rely on canonical formulae.1907 // However, when we generate the scaled formulae, we first check that the1908 // scaling factor is profitable before computing the actual ScaledReg for1909 // compile time sake.1910 assert((F.isCanonical(L) || F.Scale != 0));1911 return isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, MinOffset, MaxOffset, Kind, AccessTy,1912 F.BaseGV, F.BaseOffset, F.HasBaseReg, F.Scale);1913}1914 1915/// Test whether we know how to expand the current formula.1916static bool isLegalUse(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, Immediate MinOffset,1917 Immediate MaxOffset, LSRUse::KindType Kind,1918 MemAccessTy AccessTy, GlobalValue *BaseGV,1919 Immediate BaseOffset, bool HasBaseReg, int64_t Scale) {1920 // We know how to expand completely foldable formulae.1921 return isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, MinOffset, MaxOffset, Kind, AccessTy, BaseGV,1922 BaseOffset, HasBaseReg, Scale) ||1923 // Or formulae that use a base register produced by a sum of base1924 // registers.1925 (Scale == 1 &&1926 isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, MinOffset, MaxOffset, Kind, AccessTy,1927 BaseGV, BaseOffset, true, 0));1928}1929 1930static bool isLegalUse(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, Immediate MinOffset,1931 Immediate MaxOffset, LSRUse::KindType Kind,1932 MemAccessTy AccessTy, const Formula &F) {1933 return isLegalUse(TTI, MinOffset, MaxOffset, Kind, AccessTy, F.BaseGV,1934 F.BaseOffset, F.HasBaseReg, F.Scale);1935}1936 1937static bool isLegalAddImmediate(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,1938 Immediate Offset) {1939 if (Offset.isScalable())1940 return TTI.isLegalAddScalableImmediate(Offset.getKnownMinValue());1941 1942 return TTI.isLegalAddImmediate(Offset.getFixedValue());1943}1944 1945static bool isAMCompletelyFolded(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,1946 const LSRUse &LU, const Formula &F) {1947 // Target may want to look at the user instructions.1948 if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::Address && TTI.LSRWithInstrQueries()) {1949 for (const LSRFixup &Fixup : LU.Fixups)1950 if (!isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, LSRUse::Address, LU.AccessTy, F.BaseGV,1951 (F.BaseOffset + Fixup.Offset), F.HasBaseReg,1952 F.Scale, Fixup.UserInst))1953 return false;1954 return true;1955 }1956 1957 return isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind,1958 LU.AccessTy, F.BaseGV, F.BaseOffset, F.HasBaseReg,1959 F.Scale);1960}1961 1962static InstructionCost getScalingFactorCost(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,1963 const LSRUse &LU, const Formula &F,1964 const Loop &L) {1965 if (!F.Scale)1966 return 0;1967 1968 // If the use is not completely folded in that instruction, we will have to1969 // pay an extra cost only for scale != 1.1970 if (!isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind,1971 LU.AccessTy, F, L))1972 return F.Scale != 1;1973 1974 switch (LU.Kind) {1975 case LSRUse::Address: {1976 // Check the scaling factor cost with both the min and max offsets.1977 int64_t ScalableMin = 0, ScalableMax = 0, FixedMin = 0, FixedMax = 0;1978 if (F.BaseOffset.isScalable()) {1979 ScalableMin = (F.BaseOffset + LU.MinOffset).getKnownMinValue();1980 ScalableMax = (F.BaseOffset + LU.MaxOffset).getKnownMinValue();1981 } else {1982 FixedMin = (F.BaseOffset + LU.MinOffset).getFixedValue();1983 FixedMax = (F.BaseOffset + LU.MaxOffset).getFixedValue();1984 }1985 InstructionCost ScaleCostMinOffset = TTI.getScalingFactorCost(1986 LU.AccessTy.MemTy, F.BaseGV, StackOffset::get(FixedMin, ScalableMin),1987 F.HasBaseReg, F.Scale, LU.AccessTy.AddrSpace);1988 InstructionCost ScaleCostMaxOffset = TTI.getScalingFactorCost(1989 LU.AccessTy.MemTy, F.BaseGV, StackOffset::get(FixedMax, ScalableMax),1990 F.HasBaseReg, F.Scale, LU.AccessTy.AddrSpace);1991 1992 assert(ScaleCostMinOffset.isValid() && ScaleCostMaxOffset.isValid() &&1993 "Legal addressing mode has an illegal cost!");1994 return std::max(ScaleCostMinOffset, ScaleCostMaxOffset);1995 }1996 case LSRUse::ICmpZero:1997 case LSRUse::Basic:1998 case LSRUse::Special:1999 // The use is completely folded, i.e., everything is folded into the2000 // instruction.2001 return 0;2002 }2003 2004 llvm_unreachable("Invalid LSRUse Kind!");2005}2006 2007static bool isAlwaysFoldable(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,2008 LSRUse::KindType Kind, MemAccessTy AccessTy,2009 GlobalValue *BaseGV, Immediate BaseOffset,2010 bool HasBaseReg) {2011 // Fast-path: zero is always foldable.2012 if (BaseOffset.isZero() && !BaseGV)2013 return true;2014 2015 // Conservatively, create an address with an immediate and a2016 // base and a scale.2017 int64_t Scale = Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero ? -1 : 1;2018 2019 // Canonicalize a scale of 1 to a base register if the formula doesn't2020 // already have a base register.2021 if (!HasBaseReg && Scale == 1) {2022 Scale = 0;2023 HasBaseReg = true;2024 }2025 2026 // FIXME: Try with + without a scale? Maybe based on TTI?2027 // I think basereg + scaledreg + immediateoffset isn't a good 'conservative'2028 // default for many architectures, not just AArch64 SVE. More investigation2029 // needed later to determine if this should be used more widely than just2030 // on scalable types.2031 if (HasBaseReg && BaseOffset.isNonZero() && Kind != LSRUse::ICmpZero &&2032 AccessTy.MemTy && AccessTy.MemTy->isScalableTy() && DropScaledForVScale)2033 Scale = 0;2034 2035 return isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, Kind, AccessTy, BaseGV, BaseOffset,2036 HasBaseReg, Scale);2037}2038 2039static bool isAlwaysFoldable(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,2040 ScalarEvolution &SE, Immediate MinOffset,2041 Immediate MaxOffset, LSRUse::KindType Kind,2042 MemAccessTy AccessTy, const SCEV *S,2043 bool HasBaseReg) {2044 // Fast-path: zero is always foldable.2045 if (S->isZero()) return true;2046 2047 // Conservatively, create an address with an immediate and a2048 // base and a scale.2049 Immediate BaseOffset = ExtractImmediate(S, SE);2050 GlobalValue *BaseGV = ExtractSymbol(S, SE);2051 2052 // If there's anything else involved, it's not foldable.2053 if (!S->isZero()) return false;2054 2055 // Fast-path: zero is always foldable.2056 if (BaseOffset.isZero() && !BaseGV)2057 return true;2058 2059 if (BaseOffset.isScalable())2060 return false;2061 2062 // Conservatively, create an address with an immediate and a2063 // base and a scale.2064 int64_t Scale = Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero ? -1 : 1;2065 2066 return isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, MinOffset, MaxOffset, Kind, AccessTy, BaseGV,2067 BaseOffset, HasBaseReg, Scale);2068}2069 2070namespace {2071 2072/// An individual increment in a Chain of IV increments. Relate an IV user to2073/// an expression that computes the IV it uses from the IV used by the previous2074/// link in the Chain.2075///2076/// For the head of a chain, IncExpr holds the absolute SCEV expression for the2077/// original IVOperand. The head of the chain's IVOperand is only valid during2078/// chain collection, before LSR replaces IV users. During chain generation,2079/// IncExpr can be used to find the new IVOperand that computes the same2080/// expression.2081struct IVInc {2082 Instruction *UserInst;2083 Value* IVOperand;2084 const SCEV *IncExpr;2085 2086 IVInc(Instruction *U, Value *O, const SCEV *E)2087 : UserInst(U), IVOperand(O), IncExpr(E) {}2088};2089 2090// The list of IV increments in program order. We typically add the head of a2091// chain without finding subsequent links.2092struct IVChain {2093 SmallVector<IVInc, 1> Incs;2094 const SCEV *ExprBase = nullptr;2095 2096 IVChain() = default;2097 IVChain(const IVInc &Head, const SCEV *Base)2098 : Incs(1, Head), ExprBase(Base) {}2099 2100 using const_iterator = SmallVectorImpl<IVInc>::const_iterator;2101 2102 // Return the first increment in the chain.2103 const_iterator begin() const {2104 assert(!Incs.empty());2105 return std::next(Incs.begin());2106 }2107 const_iterator end() const {2108 return Incs.end();2109 }2110 2111 // Returns true if this chain contains any increments.2112 bool hasIncs() const { return Incs.size() >= 2; }2113 2114 // Add an IVInc to the end of this chain.2115 void add(const IVInc &X) { Incs.push_back(X); }2116 2117 // Returns the last UserInst in the chain.2118 Instruction *tailUserInst() const { return Incs.back().UserInst; }2119 2120 // Returns true if IncExpr can be profitably added to this chain.2121 bool isProfitableIncrement(const SCEV *OperExpr,2122 const SCEV *IncExpr,2123 ScalarEvolution&);2124};2125 2126/// Helper for CollectChains to track multiple IV increment uses. Distinguish2127/// between FarUsers that definitely cross IV increments and NearUsers that may2128/// be used between IV increments.2129struct ChainUsers {2130 SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 4> FarUsers;2131 SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 4> NearUsers;2132};2133 2134/// This class holds state for the main loop strength reduction logic.2135class LSRInstance {2136 IVUsers &IU;2137 ScalarEvolution &SE;2138 DominatorTree &DT;2139 LoopInfo &LI;2140 AssumptionCache &AC;2141 TargetLibraryInfo &TLI;2142 const TargetTransformInfo &TTI;2143 Loop *const L;2144 MemorySSAUpdater *MSSAU;2145 TTI::AddressingModeKind AMK;2146 mutable SCEVExpander Rewriter;2147 bool Changed = false;2148 bool HardwareLoopProfitable = false;2149 2150 /// This is the insert position that the current loop's induction variable2151 /// increment should be placed. In simple loops, this is the latch block's2152 /// terminator. But in more complicated cases, this is a position which will2153 /// dominate all the in-loop post-increment users.2154 Instruction *IVIncInsertPos = nullptr;2155 2156 /// Interesting factors between use strides.2157 ///2158 /// We explicitly use a SetVector which contains a SmallSet, instead of the2159 /// default, a SmallDenseSet, because we need to use the full range of2160 /// int64_ts, and there's currently no good way of doing that with2161 /// SmallDenseSet.2162 SetVector<int64_t, SmallVector<int64_t, 8>, SmallSet<int64_t, 8>> Factors;2163 2164 /// The cost of the current SCEV, the best solution by LSR will be dropped if2165 /// the solution is not profitable.2166 Cost BaselineCost;2167 2168 /// Interesting use types, to facilitate truncation reuse.2169 SmallSetVector<Type *, 4> Types;2170 2171 /// The list of interesting uses.2172 mutable SmallVector<LSRUse, 16> Uses;2173 2174 /// Track which uses use which register candidates.2175 RegUseTracker RegUses;2176 2177 // Limit the number of chains to avoid quadratic behavior. We don't expect to2178 // have more than a few IV increment chains in a loop. Missing a Chain falls2179 // back to normal LSR behavior for those uses.2180 static const unsigned MaxChains = 8;2181 2182 /// IV users can form a chain of IV increments.2183 SmallVector<IVChain, MaxChains> IVChainVec;2184 2185 /// IV users that belong to profitable IVChains.2186 SmallPtrSet<Use*, MaxChains> IVIncSet;2187 2188 /// Induction variables that were generated and inserted by the SCEV Expander.2189 SmallVector<llvm::WeakVH, 2> ScalarEvolutionIVs;2190 2191 // Inserting instructions in the loop and using them as PHI's input could2192 // break LCSSA in case if PHI's parent block is not a loop exit (i.e. the2193 // corresponding incoming block is not loop exiting). So collect all such2194 // instructions to form LCSSA for them later.2195 SmallSetVector<Instruction *, 4> InsertedNonLCSSAInsts;2196 2197 void OptimizeShadowIV();2198 bool FindIVUserForCond(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse *&CondUse);2199 ICmpInst *OptimizeMax(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse* &CondUse);2200 void OptimizeLoopTermCond();2201 2202 void ChainInstruction(Instruction *UserInst, Instruction *IVOper,2203 SmallVectorImpl<ChainUsers> &ChainUsersVec);2204 void FinalizeChain(IVChain &Chain);2205 void CollectChains();2206 void GenerateIVChain(const IVChain &Chain,2207 SmallVectorImpl<WeakTrackingVH> &DeadInsts);2208 2209 void CollectInterestingTypesAndFactors();2210 void CollectFixupsAndInitialFormulae();2211 2212 // Support for sharing of LSRUses between LSRFixups.2213 using UseMapTy = DenseMap<LSRUse::SCEVUseKindPair, size_t>;2214 UseMapTy UseMap;2215 2216 bool reconcileNewOffset(LSRUse &LU, Immediate NewOffset, bool HasBaseReg,2217 LSRUse::KindType Kind, MemAccessTy AccessTy);2218 2219 std::pair<size_t, Immediate> getUse(const SCEV *&Expr, LSRUse::KindType Kind,2220 MemAccessTy AccessTy);2221 2222 void DeleteUse(LSRUse &LU, size_t LUIdx);2223 2224 LSRUse *FindUseWithSimilarFormula(const Formula &F, const LSRUse &OrigLU);2225 2226 void InsertInitialFormula(const SCEV *S, LSRUse &LU, size_t LUIdx);2227 void InsertSupplementalFormula(const SCEV *S, LSRUse &LU, size_t LUIdx);2228 void CountRegisters(const Formula &F, size_t LUIdx);2229 bool InsertFormula(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, const Formula &F);2230 bool IsFixupExecutedEachIncrement(const LSRFixup &LF) const;2231 2232 void CollectLoopInvariantFixupsAndFormulae();2233 2234 void GenerateReassociations(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base,2235 unsigned Depth = 0);2236 2237 void GenerateReassociationsImpl(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,2238 const Formula &Base, unsigned Depth,2239 size_t Idx, bool IsScaledReg = false);2240 void GenerateCombinations(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base);2241 void GenerateSymbolicOffsetsImpl(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,2242 const Formula &Base, size_t Idx,2243 bool IsScaledReg = false);2244 void GenerateSymbolicOffsets(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base);2245 void GenerateConstantOffsetsImpl(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,2246 const Formula &Base,2247 const SmallVectorImpl<Immediate> &Worklist,2248 size_t Idx, bool IsScaledReg = false);2249 void GenerateConstantOffsets(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base);2250 void GenerateICmpZeroScales(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base);2251 void GenerateScales(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base);2252 void GenerateTruncates(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base);2253 void GenerateCrossUseConstantOffsets();2254 void GenerateAllReuseFormulae();2255 2256 void FilterOutUndesirableDedicatedRegisters();2257 2258 size_t EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() const;2259 void NarrowSearchSpaceByDetectingSupersets();2260 void NarrowSearchSpaceByCollapsingUnrolledCode();2261 void NarrowSearchSpaceByRefilteringUndesirableDedicatedRegisters();2262 void NarrowSearchSpaceByFilterFormulaWithSameScaledReg();2263 void NarrowSearchSpaceByFilterPostInc();2264 void NarrowSearchSpaceByDeletingCostlyFormulas();2265 void NarrowSearchSpaceByPickingWinnerRegs();2266 void NarrowSearchSpaceUsingHeuristics();2267 2268 void SolveRecurse(SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Solution,2269 Cost &SolutionCost,2270 SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Workspace,2271 const Cost &CurCost,2272 const SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 16> &CurRegs,2273 DenseSet<const SCEV *> &VisitedRegs) const;2274 void Solve(SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Solution) const;2275 2276 BasicBlock::iterator2277 HoistInsertPosition(BasicBlock::iterator IP,2278 const SmallVectorImpl<Instruction *> &Inputs) const;2279 BasicBlock::iterator AdjustInsertPositionForExpand(BasicBlock::iterator IP,2280 const LSRFixup &LF,2281 const LSRUse &LU) const;2282 2283 Value *Expand(const LSRUse &LU, const LSRFixup &LF, const Formula &F,2284 BasicBlock::iterator IP,2285 SmallVectorImpl<WeakTrackingVH> &DeadInsts) const;2286 void RewriteForPHI(PHINode *PN, const LSRUse &LU, const LSRFixup &LF,2287 const Formula &F,2288 SmallVectorImpl<WeakTrackingVH> &DeadInsts);2289 void Rewrite(const LSRUse &LU, const LSRFixup &LF, const Formula &F,2290 SmallVectorImpl<WeakTrackingVH> &DeadInsts);2291 void ImplementSolution(const SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Solution);2292 2293public:2294 LSRInstance(Loop *L, IVUsers &IU, ScalarEvolution &SE, DominatorTree &DT,2295 LoopInfo &LI, const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, AssumptionCache &AC,2296 TargetLibraryInfo &TLI, MemorySSAUpdater *MSSAU);2297 2298 bool getChanged() const { return Changed; }2299 const SmallVectorImpl<WeakVH> &getScalarEvolutionIVs() const {2300 return ScalarEvolutionIVs;2301 }2302 2303 void print_factors_and_types(raw_ostream &OS) const;2304 void print_fixups(raw_ostream &OS) const;2305 void print_uses(raw_ostream &OS) const;2306 void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;2307 void dump() const;2308};2309 2310} // end anonymous namespace2311 2312/// If IV is used in a int-to-float cast inside the loop then try to eliminate2313/// the cast operation.2314void LSRInstance::OptimizeShadowIV() {2315 const SCEV *BackedgeTakenCount = SE.getBackedgeTakenCount(L);2316 if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BackedgeTakenCount))2317 return;2318 2319 for (IVUsers::const_iterator UI = IU.begin(), E = IU.end();2320 UI != E; /* empty */) {2321 IVUsers::const_iterator CandidateUI = UI;2322 ++UI;2323 Instruction *ShadowUse = CandidateUI->getUser();2324 Type *DestTy = nullptr;2325 bool IsSigned = false;2326 2327 /* If shadow use is a int->float cast then insert a second IV2328 to eliminate this cast.2329 2330 for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i)2331 foo((double)i);2332 2333 is transformed into2334 2335 double d = 0.0;2336 for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i, ++d)2337 foo(d);2338 */2339 if (UIToFPInst *UCast = dyn_cast<UIToFPInst>(CandidateUI->getUser())) {2340 IsSigned = false;2341 DestTy = UCast->getDestTy();2342 }2343 else if (SIToFPInst *SCast = dyn_cast<SIToFPInst>(CandidateUI->getUser())) {2344 IsSigned = true;2345 DestTy = SCast->getDestTy();2346 }2347 if (!DestTy) continue;2348 2349 // If target does not support DestTy natively then do not apply2350 // this transformation.2351 if (!TTI.isTypeLegal(DestTy)) continue;2352 2353 PHINode *PH = dyn_cast<PHINode>(ShadowUse->getOperand(0));2354 if (!PH) continue;2355 if (PH->getNumIncomingValues() != 2) continue;2356 2357 // If the calculation in integers overflows, the result in FP type will2358 // differ. So we only can do this transformation if we are guaranteed to not2359 // deal with overflowing values2360 const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getSCEV(PH));2361 if (!AR) continue;2362 if (IsSigned && !AR->hasNoSignedWrap()) continue;2363 if (!IsSigned && !AR->hasNoUnsignedWrap()) continue;2364 2365 Type *SrcTy = PH->getType();2366 int Mantissa = DestTy->getFPMantissaWidth();2367 if (Mantissa == -1) continue;2368 if ((int)SE.getTypeSizeInBits(SrcTy) > Mantissa)2369 continue;2370 2371 unsigned Entry, Latch;2372 if (PH->getIncomingBlock(0) == L->getLoopPreheader()) {2373 Entry = 0;2374 Latch = 1;2375 } else {2376 Entry = 1;2377 Latch = 0;2378 }2379 2380 ConstantInt *Init = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(PH->getIncomingValue(Entry));2381 if (!Init) continue;2382 Constant *NewInit = ConstantFP::get(DestTy, IsSigned ?2383 (double)Init->getSExtValue() :2384 (double)Init->getZExtValue());2385 2386 BinaryOperator *Incr =2387 dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(PH->getIncomingValue(Latch));2388 if (!Incr) continue;2389 if (Incr->getOpcode() != Instruction::Add2390 && Incr->getOpcode() != Instruction::Sub)2391 continue;2392 2393 /* Initialize new IV, double d = 0.0 in above example. */2394 ConstantInt *C = nullptr;2395 if (Incr->getOperand(0) == PH)2396 C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Incr->getOperand(1));2397 else if (Incr->getOperand(1) == PH)2398 C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Incr->getOperand(0));2399 else2400 continue;2401 2402 if (!C) continue;2403 2404 // Ignore negative constants, as the code below doesn't handle them2405 // correctly. TODO: Remove this restriction.2406 if (!C->getValue().isStrictlyPositive())2407 continue;2408 2409 /* Add new PHINode. */2410 PHINode *NewPH = PHINode::Create(DestTy, 2, "IV.S.", PH->getIterator());2411 NewPH->setDebugLoc(PH->getDebugLoc());2412 2413 /* create new increment. '++d' in above example. */2414 Constant *CFP = ConstantFP::get(DestTy, C->getZExtValue());2415 BinaryOperator *NewIncr = BinaryOperator::Create(2416 Incr->getOpcode() == Instruction::Add ? Instruction::FAdd2417 : Instruction::FSub,2418 NewPH, CFP, "IV.S.next.", Incr->getIterator());2419 NewIncr->setDebugLoc(Incr->getDebugLoc());2420 2421 NewPH->addIncoming(NewInit, PH->getIncomingBlock(Entry));2422 NewPH->addIncoming(NewIncr, PH->getIncomingBlock(Latch));2423 2424 /* Remove cast operation */2425 ShadowUse->replaceAllUsesWith(NewPH);2426 ShadowUse->eraseFromParent();2427 Changed = true;2428 break;2429 }2430}2431 2432/// If Cond has an operand that is an expression of an IV, set the IV user and2433/// stride information and return true, otherwise return false.2434bool LSRInstance::FindIVUserForCond(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse *&CondUse) {2435 for (IVStrideUse &U : IU)2436 if (U.getUser() == Cond) {2437 // NOTE: we could handle setcc instructions with multiple uses here, but2438 // InstCombine does it as well for simple uses, it's not clear that it2439 // occurs enough in real life to handle.2440 CondUse = &U;2441 return true;2442 }2443 return false;2444}2445 2446/// Rewrite the loop's terminating condition if it uses a max computation.2447///2448/// This is a narrow solution to a specific, but acute, problem. For loops2449/// like this:2450///2451/// i = 0;2452/// do {2453/// p[i] = 0.0;2454/// } while (++i < n);2455///2456/// the trip count isn't just 'n', because 'n' might not be positive. And2457/// unfortunately this can come up even for loops where the user didn't use2458/// a C do-while loop. For example, seemingly well-behaved top-test loops2459/// will commonly be lowered like this:2460///2461/// if (n > 0) {2462/// i = 0;2463/// do {2464/// p[i] = 0.0;2465/// } while (++i < n);2466/// }2467///2468/// and then it's possible for subsequent optimization to obscure the if2469/// test in such a way that indvars can't find it.2470///2471/// When indvars can't find the if test in loops like this, it creates a2472/// max expression, which allows it to give the loop a canonical2473/// induction variable:2474///2475/// i = 0;2476/// max = n < 1 ? 1 : n;2477/// do {2478/// p[i] = 0.0;2479/// } while (++i != max);2480///2481/// Canonical induction variables are necessary because the loop passes2482/// are designed around them. The most obvious example of this is the2483/// LoopInfo analysis, which doesn't remember trip count values. It2484/// expects to be able to rediscover the trip count each time it is2485/// needed, and it does this using a simple analysis that only succeeds if2486/// the loop has a canonical induction variable.2487///2488/// However, when it comes time to generate code, the maximum operation2489/// can be quite costly, especially if it's inside of an outer loop.2490///2491/// This function solves this problem by detecting this type of loop and2492/// rewriting their conditions from ICMP_NE back to ICMP_SLT, and deleting2493/// the instructions for the maximum computation.2494ICmpInst *LSRInstance::OptimizeMax(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse* &CondUse) {2495 // Check that the loop matches the pattern we're looking for.2496 if (Cond->getPredicate() != CmpInst::ICMP_EQ &&2497 Cond->getPredicate() != CmpInst::ICMP_NE)2498 return Cond;2499 2500 SelectInst *Sel = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(Cond->getOperand(1));2501 if (!Sel || !Sel->hasOneUse()) return Cond;2502 2503 const SCEV *BackedgeTakenCount = SE.getBackedgeTakenCount(L);2504 if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BackedgeTakenCount))2505 return Cond;2506 const SCEV *One = SE.getConstant(BackedgeTakenCount->getType(), 1);2507 2508 // Add one to the backedge-taken count to get the trip count.2509 const SCEV *IterationCount = SE.getAddExpr(One, BackedgeTakenCount);2510 if (IterationCount != SE.getSCEV(Sel)) return Cond;2511 2512 // Check for a max calculation that matches the pattern. There's no check2513 // for ICMP_ULE here because the comparison would be with zero, which2514 // isn't interesting.2515 CmpInst::Predicate Pred = ICmpInst::BAD_ICMP_PREDICATE;2516 const SCEVNAryExpr *Max = nullptr;2517 if (const SCEVSMaxExpr *S = dyn_cast<SCEVSMaxExpr>(BackedgeTakenCount)) {2518 Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE;2519 Max = S;2520 } else if (const SCEVSMaxExpr *S = dyn_cast<SCEVSMaxExpr>(IterationCount)) {2521 Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT;2522 Max = S;2523 } else if (const SCEVUMaxExpr *U = dyn_cast<SCEVUMaxExpr>(IterationCount)) {2524 Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT;2525 Max = U;2526 } else {2527 // No match; bail.2528 return Cond;2529 }2530 2531 // To handle a max with more than two operands, this optimization would2532 // require additional checking and setup.2533 if (Max->getNumOperands() != 2)2534 return Cond;2535 2536 const SCEV *MaxLHS = Max->getOperand(0);2537 const SCEV *MaxRHS = Max->getOperand(1);2538 2539 // ScalarEvolution canonicalizes constants to the left. For < and >, look2540 // for a comparison with 1. For <= and >=, a comparison with zero.2541 if (!MaxLHS ||2542 (ICmpInst::isTrueWhenEqual(Pred) ? !MaxLHS->isZero() : (MaxLHS != One)))2543 return Cond;2544 2545 // Check the relevant induction variable for conformance to2546 // the pattern.2547 const SCEV *IV = SE.getSCEV(Cond->getOperand(0));2548 if (!match(IV,2549 m_scev_AffineAddRec(m_scev_SpecificInt(1), m_scev_SpecificInt(1))))2550 return Cond;2551 2552 assert(cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(IV)->getLoop() == L &&2553 "Loop condition operand is an addrec in a different loop!");2554 2555 // Check the right operand of the select, and remember it, as it will2556 // be used in the new comparison instruction.2557 Value *NewRHS = nullptr;2558 if (ICmpInst::isTrueWhenEqual(Pred)) {2559 // Look for n+1, and grab n.2560 if (AddOperator *BO = dyn_cast<AddOperator>(Sel->getOperand(1)))2561 if (ConstantInt *BO1 = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BO->getOperand(1)))2562 if (BO1->isOne() && SE.getSCEV(BO->getOperand(0)) == MaxRHS)2563 NewRHS = BO->getOperand(0);2564 if (AddOperator *BO = dyn_cast<AddOperator>(Sel->getOperand(2)))2565 if (ConstantInt *BO1 = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BO->getOperand(1)))2566 if (BO1->isOne() && SE.getSCEV(BO->getOperand(0)) == MaxRHS)2567 NewRHS = BO->getOperand(0);2568 if (!NewRHS)2569 return Cond;2570 } else if (SE.getSCEV(Sel->getOperand(1)) == MaxRHS)2571 NewRHS = Sel->getOperand(1);2572 else if (SE.getSCEV(Sel->getOperand(2)) == MaxRHS)2573 NewRHS = Sel->getOperand(2);2574 else if (const SCEVUnknown *SU = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(MaxRHS))2575 NewRHS = SU->getValue();2576 else2577 // Max doesn't match expected pattern.2578 return Cond;2579 2580 // Determine the new comparison opcode. It may be signed or unsigned,2581 // and the original comparison may be either equality or inequality.2582 if (Cond->getPredicate() == CmpInst::ICMP_EQ)2583 Pred = CmpInst::getInversePredicate(Pred);2584 2585 // Ok, everything looks ok to change the condition into an SLT or SGE and2586 // delete the max calculation.2587 ICmpInst *NewCond = new ICmpInst(Cond->getIterator(), Pred,2588 Cond->getOperand(0), NewRHS, "scmp");2589 2590 // Delete the max calculation instructions.2591 NewCond->setDebugLoc(Cond->getDebugLoc());2592 Cond->replaceAllUsesWith(NewCond);2593 CondUse->setUser(NewCond);2594 Instruction *Cmp = cast<Instruction>(Sel->getOperand(0));2595 Cond->eraseFromParent();2596 Sel->eraseFromParent();2597 if (Cmp->use_empty()) {2598 salvageDebugInfo(*Cmp);2599 Cmp->eraseFromParent();2600 }2601 return NewCond;2602}2603 2604/// Change loop terminating condition to use the postinc iv when possible.2605void2606LSRInstance::OptimizeLoopTermCond() {2607 SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 4> PostIncs;2608 2609 // We need a different set of heuristics for rotated and non-rotated loops.2610 // If a loop is rotated then the latch is also the backedge, so inserting2611 // post-inc expressions just before the latch is ideal. To reduce live ranges2612 // it also makes sense to rewrite terminating conditions to use post-inc2613 // expressions.2614 //2615 // If the loop is not rotated then the latch is not a backedge; the latch2616 // check is done in the loop head. Adding post-inc expressions before the2617 // latch will cause overlapping live-ranges of pre-inc and post-inc expressions2618 // in the loop body. In this case we do *not* want to use post-inc expressions2619 // in the latch check, and we want to insert post-inc expressions before2620 // the backedge.2621 BasicBlock *LatchBlock = L->getLoopLatch();2622 SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 8> ExitingBlocks;2623 L->getExitingBlocks(ExitingBlocks);2624 if (!llvm::is_contained(ExitingBlocks, LatchBlock)) {2625 // The backedge doesn't exit the loop; treat this as a head-tested loop.2626 IVIncInsertPos = LatchBlock->getTerminator();2627 return;2628 }2629 2630 // Otherwise treat this as a rotated loop.2631 for (BasicBlock *ExitingBlock : ExitingBlocks) {2632 // Get the terminating condition for the loop if possible. If we2633 // can, we want to change it to use a post-incremented version of its2634 // induction variable, to allow coalescing the live ranges for the IV into2635 // one register value.2636 2637 BranchInst *TermBr = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(ExitingBlock->getTerminator());2638 if (!TermBr)2639 continue;2640 // FIXME: Overly conservative, termination condition could be an 'or' etc..2641 if (TermBr->isUnconditional() || !isa<ICmpInst>(TermBr->getCondition()))2642 continue;2643 2644 // Search IVUsesByStride to find Cond's IVUse if there is one.2645 IVStrideUse *CondUse = nullptr;2646 ICmpInst *Cond = cast<ICmpInst>(TermBr->getCondition());2647 if (!FindIVUserForCond(Cond, CondUse))2648 continue;2649 2650 // If the trip count is computed in terms of a max (due to ScalarEvolution2651 // being unable to find a sufficient guard, for example), change the loop2652 // comparison to use SLT or ULT instead of NE.2653 // One consequence of doing this now is that it disrupts the count-down2654 // optimization. That's not always a bad thing though, because in such2655 // cases it may still be worthwhile to avoid a max.2656 Cond = OptimizeMax(Cond, CondUse);2657 2658 // If this exiting block dominates the latch block, it may also use2659 // the post-inc value if it won't be shared with other uses.2660 // Check for dominance.2661 if (!DT.dominates(ExitingBlock, LatchBlock))2662 continue;2663 2664 // Conservatively avoid trying to use the post-inc value in non-latch2665 // exits if there may be pre-inc users in intervening blocks.2666 if (LatchBlock != ExitingBlock)2667 for (const IVStrideUse &UI : IU)2668 // Test if the use is reachable from the exiting block. This dominator2669 // query is a conservative approximation of reachability.2670 if (&UI != CondUse &&2671 !DT.properlyDominates(UI.getUser()->getParent(), ExitingBlock)) {2672 // Conservatively assume there may be reuse if the quotient of their2673 // strides could be a legal scale.2674 const SCEV *A = IU.getStride(*CondUse, L);2675 const SCEV *B = IU.getStride(UI, L);2676 if (!A || !B) continue;2677 if (SE.getTypeSizeInBits(A->getType()) !=2678 SE.getTypeSizeInBits(B->getType())) {2679 if (SE.getTypeSizeInBits(A->getType()) >2680 SE.getTypeSizeInBits(B->getType()))2681 B = SE.getSignExtendExpr(B, A->getType());2682 else2683 A = SE.getSignExtendExpr(A, B->getType());2684 }2685 if (const SCEVConstant *D =2686 dyn_cast_or_null<SCEVConstant>(getExactSDiv(B, A, SE))) {2687 const ConstantInt *C = D->getValue();2688 // Stride of one or negative one can have reuse with non-addresses.2689 if (C->isOne() || C->isMinusOne())2690 goto decline_post_inc;2691 // Avoid weird situations.2692 if (C->getValue().getSignificantBits() >= 64 ||2693 C->getValue().isMinSignedValue())2694 goto decline_post_inc;2695 // Check for possible scaled-address reuse.2696 if (isAddressUse(TTI, UI.getUser(), UI.getOperandValToReplace())) {2697 MemAccessTy AccessTy =2698 getAccessType(TTI, UI.getUser(), UI.getOperandValToReplace());2699 int64_t Scale = C->getSExtValue();2700 if (TTI.isLegalAddressingMode(AccessTy.MemTy, /*BaseGV=*/nullptr,2701 /*BaseOffset=*/0,2702 /*HasBaseReg=*/true, Scale,2703 AccessTy.AddrSpace))2704 goto decline_post_inc;2705 Scale = -Scale;2706 if (TTI.isLegalAddressingMode(AccessTy.MemTy, /*BaseGV=*/nullptr,2707 /*BaseOffset=*/0,2708 /*HasBaseReg=*/true, Scale,2709 AccessTy.AddrSpace))2710 goto decline_post_inc;2711 }2712 }2713 }2714 2715 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Change loop exiting icmp to use postinc iv: "2716 << *Cond << '\n');2717 2718 // It's possible for the setcc instruction to be anywhere in the loop, and2719 // possible for it to have multiple users. If it is not immediately before2720 // the exiting block branch, move it.2721 if (Cond->getNextNode() != TermBr) {2722 if (Cond->hasOneUse()) {2723 Cond->moveBefore(TermBr->getIterator());2724 } else {2725 // Clone the terminating condition and insert into the loopend.2726 ICmpInst *OldCond = Cond;2727 Cond = cast<ICmpInst>(Cond->clone());2728 Cond->setName(L->getHeader()->getName() + ".termcond");2729 Cond->insertInto(ExitingBlock, TermBr->getIterator());2730 2731 // Clone the IVUse, as the old use still exists!2732 CondUse = &IU.AddUser(Cond, CondUse->getOperandValToReplace());2733 TermBr->replaceUsesOfWith(OldCond, Cond);2734 }2735 }2736 2737 // If we get to here, we know that we can transform the setcc instruction to2738 // use the post-incremented version of the IV, allowing us to coalesce the2739 // live ranges for the IV correctly.2740 CondUse->transformToPostInc(L);2741 Changed = true;2742 2743 PostIncs.insert(Cond);2744 decline_post_inc:;2745 }2746 2747 // Determine an insertion point for the loop induction variable increment. It2748 // must dominate all the post-inc comparisons we just set up, and it must2749 // dominate the loop latch edge.2750 IVIncInsertPos = L->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator();2751 for (Instruction *Inst : PostIncs)2752 IVIncInsertPos = DT.findNearestCommonDominator(IVIncInsertPos, Inst);2753}2754 2755/// Determine if the given use can accommodate a fixup at the given offset and2756/// other details. If so, update the use and return true.2757bool LSRInstance::reconcileNewOffset(LSRUse &LU, Immediate NewOffset,2758 bool HasBaseReg, LSRUse::KindType Kind,2759 MemAccessTy AccessTy) {2760 Immediate NewMinOffset = LU.MinOffset;2761 Immediate NewMaxOffset = LU.MaxOffset;2762 MemAccessTy NewAccessTy = AccessTy;2763 2764 // Check for a mismatched kind. It's tempting to collapse mismatched kinds to2765 // something conservative, however this can pessimize in the case that one of2766 // the uses will have all its uses outside the loop, for example.2767 if (LU.Kind != Kind)2768 return false;2769 2770 // Check for a mismatched access type, and fall back conservatively as needed.2771 // TODO: Be less conservative when the type is similar and can use the same2772 // addressing modes.2773 if (Kind == LSRUse::Address) {2774 if (AccessTy.MemTy != LU.AccessTy.MemTy) {2775 NewAccessTy = MemAccessTy::getUnknown(AccessTy.MemTy->getContext(),2776 AccessTy.AddrSpace);2777 }2778 }2779 2780 // Conservatively assume HasBaseReg is true for now.2781 if (Immediate::isKnownLT(NewOffset, LU.MinOffset)) {2782 if (!isAlwaysFoldable(TTI, Kind, NewAccessTy, /*BaseGV=*/nullptr,2783 LU.MaxOffset - NewOffset, HasBaseReg))2784 return false;2785 NewMinOffset = NewOffset;2786 } else if (Immediate::isKnownGT(NewOffset, LU.MaxOffset)) {2787 if (!isAlwaysFoldable(TTI, Kind, NewAccessTy, /*BaseGV=*/nullptr,2788 NewOffset - LU.MinOffset, HasBaseReg))2789 return false;2790 NewMaxOffset = NewOffset;2791 }2792 2793 // FIXME: We should be able to handle some level of scalable offset support2794 // for 'void', but in order to get basic support up and running this is2795 // being left out.2796 if (NewAccessTy.MemTy && NewAccessTy.MemTy->isVoidTy() &&2797 (NewMinOffset.isScalable() || NewMaxOffset.isScalable()))2798 return false;2799 2800 // Update the use.2801 LU.MinOffset = NewMinOffset;2802 LU.MaxOffset = NewMaxOffset;2803 LU.AccessTy = NewAccessTy;2804 return true;2805}2806 2807/// Return an LSRUse index and an offset value for a fixup which needs the given2808/// expression, with the given kind and optional access type. Either reuse an2809/// existing use or create a new one, as needed.2810std::pair<size_t, Immediate> LSRInstance::getUse(const SCEV *&Expr,2811 LSRUse::KindType Kind,2812 MemAccessTy AccessTy) {2813 const SCEV *Copy = Expr;2814 Immediate Offset = ExtractImmediate(Expr, SE);2815 2816 // Basic uses can't accept any offset, for example.2817 if (!isAlwaysFoldable(TTI, Kind, AccessTy, /*BaseGV=*/ nullptr,2818 Offset, /*HasBaseReg=*/ true)) {2819 Expr = Copy;2820 Offset = Immediate::getFixed(0);2821 }2822 2823 std::pair<UseMapTy::iterator, bool> P =2824 UseMap.try_emplace(LSRUse::SCEVUseKindPair(Expr, Kind));2825 if (!P.second) {2826 // A use already existed with this base.2827 size_t LUIdx = P.first->second;2828 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];2829 if (reconcileNewOffset(LU, Offset, /*HasBaseReg=*/true, Kind, AccessTy))2830 // Reuse this use.2831 return std::make_pair(LUIdx, Offset);2832 }2833 2834 // Create a new use.2835 size_t LUIdx = Uses.size();2836 P.first->second = LUIdx;2837 Uses.push_back(LSRUse(Kind, AccessTy));2838 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];2839 2840 LU.MinOffset = Offset;2841 LU.MaxOffset = Offset;2842 return std::make_pair(LUIdx, Offset);2843}2844 2845/// Delete the given use from the Uses list.2846void LSRInstance::DeleteUse(LSRUse &LU, size_t LUIdx) {2847 if (&LU != &Uses.back())2848 std::swap(LU, Uses.back());2849 Uses.pop_back();2850 2851 // Update RegUses.2852 RegUses.swapAndDropUse(LUIdx, Uses.size());2853}2854 2855/// Look for a use distinct from OrigLU which is has a formula that has the same2856/// registers as the given formula.2857LSRUse *2858LSRInstance::FindUseWithSimilarFormula(const Formula &OrigF,2859 const LSRUse &OrigLU) {2860 // Search all uses for the formula. This could be more clever.2861 for (LSRUse &LU : Uses) {2862 // Check whether this use is close enough to OrigLU, to see whether it's2863 // worthwhile looking through its formulae.2864 // Ignore ICmpZero uses because they may contain formulae generated by2865 // GenerateICmpZeroScales, in which case adding fixup offsets may2866 // be invalid.2867 if (&LU != &OrigLU &&2868 LU.Kind != LSRUse::ICmpZero &&2869 LU.Kind == OrigLU.Kind && OrigLU.AccessTy == LU.AccessTy &&2870 LU.WidestFixupType == OrigLU.WidestFixupType &&2871 LU.HasFormulaWithSameRegs(OrigF)) {2872 // Scan through this use's formulae.2873 for (const Formula &F : LU.Formulae) {2874 // Check to see if this formula has the same registers and symbols2875 // as OrigF.2876 if (F.BaseRegs == OrigF.BaseRegs &&2877 F.ScaledReg == OrigF.ScaledReg &&2878 F.BaseGV == OrigF.BaseGV &&2879 F.Scale == OrigF.Scale &&2880 F.UnfoldedOffset == OrigF.UnfoldedOffset) {2881 if (F.BaseOffset.isZero())2882 return &LU;2883 // This is the formula where all the registers and symbols matched;2884 // there aren't going to be any others. Since we declined it, we2885 // can skip the rest of the formulae and proceed to the next LSRUse.2886 break;2887 }2888 }2889 }2890 }2891 2892 // Nothing looked good.2893 return nullptr;2894}2895 2896void LSRInstance::CollectInterestingTypesAndFactors() {2897 SmallSetVector<const SCEV *, 4> Strides;2898 2899 // Collect interesting types and strides.2900 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Worklist;2901 for (const IVStrideUse &U : IU) {2902 const SCEV *Expr = IU.getExpr(U);2903 if (!Expr)2904 continue;2905 2906 // Collect interesting types.2907 Types.insert(SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(Expr->getType()));2908 2909 // Add strides for mentioned loops.2910 Worklist.push_back(Expr);2911 do {2912 const SCEV *S = Worklist.pop_back_val();2913 if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {2914 if (AR->getLoop() == L)2915 Strides.insert(AR->getStepRecurrence(SE));2916 Worklist.push_back(AR->getStart());2917 } else if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S)) {2918 append_range(Worklist, Add->operands());2919 }2920 } while (!Worklist.empty());2921 }2922 2923 // Compute interesting factors from the set of interesting strides.2924 for (SmallSetVector<const SCEV *, 4>::const_iterator2925 I = Strides.begin(), E = Strides.end(); I != E; ++I)2926 for (SmallSetVector<const SCEV *, 4>::const_iterator NewStrideIter =2927 std::next(I); NewStrideIter != E; ++NewStrideIter) {2928 const SCEV *OldStride = *I;2929 const SCEV *NewStride = *NewStrideIter;2930 2931 if (SE.getTypeSizeInBits(OldStride->getType()) !=2932 SE.getTypeSizeInBits(NewStride->getType())) {2933 if (SE.getTypeSizeInBits(OldStride->getType()) >2934 SE.getTypeSizeInBits(NewStride->getType()))2935 NewStride = SE.getSignExtendExpr(NewStride, OldStride->getType());2936 else2937 OldStride = SE.getSignExtendExpr(OldStride, NewStride->getType());2938 }2939 if (const SCEVConstant *Factor =2940 dyn_cast_or_null<SCEVConstant>(getExactSDiv(NewStride, OldStride,2941 SE, true))) {2942 if (Factor->getAPInt().getSignificantBits() <= 64 && !Factor->isZero())2943 Factors.insert(Factor->getAPInt().getSExtValue());2944 } else if (const SCEVConstant *Factor =2945 dyn_cast_or_null<SCEVConstant>(getExactSDiv(OldStride,2946 NewStride,2947 SE, true))) {2948 if (Factor->getAPInt().getSignificantBits() <= 64 && !Factor->isZero())2949 Factors.insert(Factor->getAPInt().getSExtValue());2950 }2951 }2952 2953 // If all uses use the same type, don't bother looking for truncation-based2954 // reuse.2955 if (Types.size() == 1)2956 Types.clear();2957 2958 LLVM_DEBUG(print_factors_and_types(dbgs()));2959}2960 2961/// Helper for CollectChains that finds an IV operand (computed by an AddRec in2962/// this loop) within [OI,OE) or returns OE. If IVUsers mapped Instructions to2963/// IVStrideUses, we could partially skip this.2964static User::op_iterator2965findIVOperand(User::op_iterator OI, User::op_iterator OE,2966 Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE) {2967 for(; OI != OE; ++OI) {2968 if (Instruction *Oper = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*OI)) {2969 if (!SE.isSCEVable(Oper->getType()))2970 continue;2971 2972 if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR =2973 dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getSCEV(Oper))) {2974 if (AR->getLoop() == L)2975 break;2976 }2977 }2978 }2979 return OI;2980}2981 2982/// IVChain logic must consistently peek base TruncInst operands, so wrap it in2983/// a convenient helper.2984static Value *getWideOperand(Value *Oper) {2985 if (TruncInst *Trunc = dyn_cast<TruncInst>(Oper))2986 return Trunc->getOperand(0);2987 return Oper;2988}2989 2990/// Return an approximation of this SCEV expression's "base", or NULL for any2991/// constant. Returning the expression itself is conservative. Returning a2992/// deeper subexpression is more precise and valid as long as it isn't less2993/// complex than another subexpression. For expressions involving multiple2994/// unscaled values, we need to return the pointer-type SCEVUnknown. This avoids2995/// forming chains across objects, such as: PrevOper==a[i], IVOper==b[i],2996/// IVInc==b-a.2997///2998/// Since SCEVUnknown is the rightmost type, and pointers are the rightmost2999/// SCEVUnknown, we simply return the rightmost SCEV operand.3000static const SCEV *getExprBase(const SCEV *S) {3001 switch (S->getSCEVType()) {3002 default: // including scUnknown.3003 return S;3004 case scConstant:3005 case scVScale:3006 return nullptr;3007 case scTruncate:3008 return getExprBase(cast<SCEVTruncateExpr>(S)->getOperand());3009 case scZeroExtend:3010 return getExprBase(cast<SCEVZeroExtendExpr>(S)->getOperand());3011 case scSignExtend:3012 return getExprBase(cast<SCEVSignExtendExpr>(S)->getOperand());3013 case scAddExpr: {3014 // Skip over scaled operands (scMulExpr) to follow add operands as long as3015 // there's nothing more complex.3016 // FIXME: not sure if we want to recognize negation.3017 const SCEVAddExpr *Add = cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S);3018 for (const SCEV *SubExpr : reverse(Add->operands())) {3019 if (SubExpr->getSCEVType() == scAddExpr)3020 return getExprBase(SubExpr);3021 3022 if (SubExpr->getSCEVType() != scMulExpr)3023 return SubExpr;3024 }3025 return S; // all operands are scaled, be conservative.3026 }3027 case scAddRecExpr:3028 return getExprBase(cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)->getStart());3029 }3030 llvm_unreachable("Unknown SCEV kind!");3031}3032 3033/// Return true if the chain increment is profitable to expand into a loop3034/// invariant value, which may require its own register. A profitable chain3035/// increment will be an offset relative to the same base. We allow such offsets3036/// to potentially be used as chain increment as long as it's not obviously3037/// expensive to expand using real instructions.3038bool IVChain::isProfitableIncrement(const SCEV *OperExpr,3039 const SCEV *IncExpr,3040 ScalarEvolution &SE) {3041 // Aggressively form chains when -stress-ivchain.3042 if (StressIVChain)3043 return true;3044 3045 // Do not replace a constant offset from IV head with a nonconstant IV3046 // increment.3047 if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(IncExpr)) {3048 const SCEV *HeadExpr = SE.getSCEV(getWideOperand(Incs[0].IVOperand));3049 if (isa<SCEVConstant>(SE.getMinusSCEV(OperExpr, HeadExpr)))3050 return false;3051 }3052 3053 SmallPtrSet<const SCEV*, 8> Processed;3054 return !isHighCostExpansion(IncExpr, Processed, SE);3055}3056 3057/// Return true if the number of registers needed for the chain is estimated to3058/// be less than the number required for the individual IV users. First prohibit3059/// any IV users that keep the IV live across increments (the Users set should3060/// be empty). Next count the number and type of increments in the chain.3061///3062/// Chaining IVs can lead to considerable code bloat if ISEL doesn't3063/// effectively use postinc addressing modes. Only consider it profitable it the3064/// increments can be computed in fewer registers when chained.3065///3066/// TODO: Consider IVInc free if it's already used in another chains.3067static bool isProfitableChain(IVChain &Chain,3068 SmallPtrSetImpl<Instruction *> &Users,3069 ScalarEvolution &SE,3070 const TargetTransformInfo &TTI) {3071 if (StressIVChain)3072 return true;3073 3074 if (!Chain.hasIncs())3075 return false;3076 3077 if (!Users.empty()) {3078 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Chain: " << *Chain.Incs[0].UserInst << " users:\n";3079 for (Instruction *Inst3080 : Users) { dbgs() << " " << *Inst << "\n"; });3081 return false;3082 }3083 assert(!Chain.Incs.empty() && "empty IV chains are not allowed");3084 3085 // The chain itself may require a register, so intialize cost to 1.3086 int cost = 1;3087 3088 // A complete chain likely eliminates the need for keeping the original IV in3089 // a register. LSR does not currently know how to form a complete chain unless3090 // the header phi already exists.3091 if (isa<PHINode>(Chain.tailUserInst())3092 && SE.getSCEV(Chain.tailUserInst()) == Chain.Incs[0].IncExpr) {3093 --cost;3094 }3095 const SCEV *LastIncExpr = nullptr;3096 unsigned NumConstIncrements = 0;3097 unsigned NumVarIncrements = 0;3098 unsigned NumReusedIncrements = 0;3099 3100 if (TTI.isProfitableLSRChainElement(Chain.Incs[0].UserInst))3101 return true;3102 3103 for (const IVInc &Inc : Chain) {3104 if (TTI.isProfitableLSRChainElement(Inc.UserInst))3105 return true;3106 if (Inc.IncExpr->isZero())3107 continue;3108 3109 // Incrementing by zero or some constant is neutral. We assume constants can3110 // be folded into an addressing mode or an add's immediate operand.3111 if (isa<SCEVConstant>(Inc.IncExpr)) {3112 ++NumConstIncrements;3113 continue;3114 }3115 3116 if (Inc.IncExpr == LastIncExpr)3117 ++NumReusedIncrements;3118 else3119 ++NumVarIncrements;3120 3121 LastIncExpr = Inc.IncExpr;3122 }3123 // An IV chain with a single increment is handled by LSR's postinc3124 // uses. However, a chain with multiple increments requires keeping the IV's3125 // value live longer than it needs to be if chained.3126 if (NumConstIncrements > 1)3127 --cost;3128 3129 // Materializing increment expressions in the preheader that didn't exist in3130 // the original code may cost a register. For example, sign-extended array3131 // indices can produce ridiculous increments like this:3132 // IV + ((sext i32 (2 * %s) to i64) + (-1 * (sext i32 %s to i64)))3133 cost += NumVarIncrements;3134 3135 // Reusing variable increments likely saves a register to hold the multiple of3136 // the stride.3137 cost -= NumReusedIncrements;3138 3139 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Chain: " << *Chain.Incs[0].UserInst << " Cost: " << cost3140 << "\n");3141 3142 return cost < 0;3143}3144 3145/// Add this IV user to an existing chain or make it the head of a new chain.3146void LSRInstance::ChainInstruction(Instruction *UserInst, Instruction *IVOper,3147 SmallVectorImpl<ChainUsers> &ChainUsersVec) {3148 // When IVs are used as types of varying widths, they are generally converted3149 // to a wider type with some uses remaining narrow under a (free) trunc.3150 Value *const NextIV = getWideOperand(IVOper);3151 const SCEV *const OperExpr = SE.getSCEV(NextIV);3152 const SCEV *const OperExprBase = getExprBase(OperExpr);3153 3154 // Visit all existing chains. Check if its IVOper can be computed as a3155 // profitable loop invariant increment from the last link in the Chain.3156 unsigned ChainIdx = 0, NChains = IVChainVec.size();3157 const SCEV *LastIncExpr = nullptr;3158 for (; ChainIdx < NChains; ++ChainIdx) {3159 IVChain &Chain = IVChainVec[ChainIdx];3160 3161 // Prune the solution space aggressively by checking that both IV operands3162 // are expressions that operate on the same unscaled SCEVUnknown. This3163 // "base" will be canceled by the subsequent getMinusSCEV call. Checking3164 // first avoids creating extra SCEV expressions.3165 if (!StressIVChain && Chain.ExprBase != OperExprBase)3166 continue;3167 3168 Value *PrevIV = getWideOperand(Chain.Incs.back().IVOperand);3169 if (PrevIV->getType() != NextIV->getType())3170 continue;3171 3172 // A phi node terminates a chain.3173 if (isa<PHINode>(UserInst) && isa<PHINode>(Chain.tailUserInst()))3174 continue;3175 3176 // The increment must be loop-invariant so it can be kept in a register.3177 const SCEV *PrevExpr = SE.getSCEV(PrevIV);3178 const SCEV *IncExpr = SE.getMinusSCEV(OperExpr, PrevExpr);3179 if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(IncExpr) || !SE.isLoopInvariant(IncExpr, L))3180 continue;3181 3182 if (Chain.isProfitableIncrement(OperExpr, IncExpr, SE)) {3183 LastIncExpr = IncExpr;3184 break;3185 }3186 }3187 // If we haven't found a chain, create a new one, unless we hit the max. Don't3188 // bother for phi nodes, because they must be last in the chain.3189 if (ChainIdx == NChains) {3190 if (isa<PHINode>(UserInst))3191 return;3192 if (NChains >= MaxChains && !StressIVChain) {3193 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "IV Chain Limit\n");3194 return;3195 }3196 LastIncExpr = OperExpr;3197 // IVUsers may have skipped over sign/zero extensions. We don't currently3198 // attempt to form chains involving extensions unless they can be hoisted3199 // into this loop's AddRec.3200 if (!isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(LastIncExpr))3201 return;3202 ++NChains;3203 IVChainVec.push_back(IVChain(IVInc(UserInst, IVOper, LastIncExpr),3204 OperExprBase));3205 ChainUsersVec.resize(NChains);3206 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "IV Chain#" << ChainIdx << " Head: (" << *UserInst3207 << ") IV=" << *LastIncExpr << "\n");3208 } else {3209 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "IV Chain#" << ChainIdx << " Inc: (" << *UserInst3210 << ") IV+" << *LastIncExpr << "\n");3211 // Add this IV user to the end of the chain.3212 IVChainVec[ChainIdx].add(IVInc(UserInst, IVOper, LastIncExpr));3213 }3214 IVChain &Chain = IVChainVec[ChainIdx];3215 3216 SmallPtrSet<Instruction*,4> &NearUsers = ChainUsersVec[ChainIdx].NearUsers;3217 // This chain's NearUsers become FarUsers.3218 if (!LastIncExpr->isZero()) {3219 ChainUsersVec[ChainIdx].FarUsers.insert_range(NearUsers);3220 NearUsers.clear();3221 }3222 3223 // All other uses of IVOperand become near uses of the chain.3224 // We currently ignore intermediate values within SCEV expressions, assuming3225 // they will eventually be used be the current chain, or can be computed3226 // from one of the chain increments. To be more precise we could3227 // transitively follow its user and only add leaf IV users to the set.3228 for (User *U : IVOper->users()) {3229 Instruction *OtherUse = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U);3230 if (!OtherUse)3231 continue;3232 // Uses in the chain will no longer be uses if the chain is formed.3233 // Include the head of the chain in this iteration (not Chain.begin()).3234 IVChain::const_iterator IncIter = Chain.Incs.begin();3235 IVChain::const_iterator IncEnd = Chain.Incs.end();3236 for( ; IncIter != IncEnd; ++IncIter) {3237 if (IncIter->UserInst == OtherUse)3238 break;3239 }3240 if (IncIter != IncEnd)3241 continue;3242 3243 if (SE.isSCEVable(OtherUse->getType())3244 && !isa<SCEVUnknown>(SE.getSCEV(OtherUse))3245 && IU.isIVUserOrOperand(OtherUse)) {3246 continue;3247 }3248 NearUsers.insert(OtherUse);3249 }3250 3251 // Since this user is part of the chain, it's no longer considered a use3252 // of the chain.3253 ChainUsersVec[ChainIdx].FarUsers.erase(UserInst);3254}3255 3256/// Populate the vector of Chains.3257///3258/// This decreases ILP at the architecture level. Targets with ample registers,3259/// multiple memory ports, and no register renaming probably don't want3260/// this. However, such targets should probably disable LSR altogether.3261///3262/// The job of LSR is to make a reasonable choice of induction variables across3263/// the loop. Subsequent passes can easily "unchain" computation exposing more3264/// ILP *within the loop* if the target wants it.3265///3266/// Finding the best IV chain is potentially a scheduling problem. Since LSR3267/// will not reorder memory operations, it will recognize this as a chain, but3268/// will generate redundant IV increments. Ideally this would be corrected later3269/// by a smart scheduler:3270/// = A[i]3271/// = A[i+x]3272/// A[i] =3273/// A[i+x] =3274///3275/// TODO: Walk the entire domtree within this loop, not just the path to the3276/// loop latch. This will discover chains on side paths, but requires3277/// maintaining multiple copies of the Chains state.3278void LSRInstance::CollectChains() {3279 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Collecting IV Chains.\n");3280 SmallVector<ChainUsers, 8> ChainUsersVec;3281 3282 SmallVector<BasicBlock *,8> LatchPath;3283 BasicBlock *LoopHeader = L->getHeader();3284 for (DomTreeNode *Rung = DT.getNode(L->getLoopLatch());3285 Rung->getBlock() != LoopHeader; Rung = Rung->getIDom()) {3286 LatchPath.push_back(Rung->getBlock());3287 }3288 LatchPath.push_back(LoopHeader);3289 3290 // Walk the instruction stream from the loop header to the loop latch.3291 for (BasicBlock *BB : reverse(LatchPath)) {3292 for (Instruction &I : *BB) {3293 // Skip instructions that weren't seen by IVUsers analysis.3294 if (isa<PHINode>(I) || !IU.isIVUserOrOperand(&I))3295 continue;3296 3297 // Ignore users that are part of a SCEV expression. This way we only3298 // consider leaf IV Users. This effectively rediscovers a portion of3299 // IVUsers analysis but in program order this time.3300 if (SE.isSCEVable(I.getType()) && !isa<SCEVUnknown>(SE.getSCEV(&I)))3301 continue;3302 3303 // Remove this instruction from any NearUsers set it may be in.3304 for (unsigned ChainIdx = 0, NChains = IVChainVec.size();3305 ChainIdx < NChains; ++ChainIdx) {3306 ChainUsersVec[ChainIdx].NearUsers.erase(&I);3307 }3308 // Search for operands that can be chained.3309 SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 4> UniqueOperands;3310 User::op_iterator IVOpEnd = I.op_end();3311 User::op_iterator IVOpIter = findIVOperand(I.op_begin(), IVOpEnd, L, SE);3312 while (IVOpIter != IVOpEnd) {3313 Instruction *IVOpInst = cast<Instruction>(*IVOpIter);3314 if (UniqueOperands.insert(IVOpInst).second)3315 ChainInstruction(&I, IVOpInst, ChainUsersVec);3316 IVOpIter = findIVOperand(std::next(IVOpIter), IVOpEnd, L, SE);3317 }3318 } // Continue walking down the instructions.3319 } // Continue walking down the domtree.3320 // Visit phi backedges to determine if the chain can generate the IV postinc.3321 for (PHINode &PN : L->getHeader()->phis()) {3322 if (!SE.isSCEVable(PN.getType()))3323 continue;3324 3325 Instruction *IncV =3326 dyn_cast<Instruction>(PN.getIncomingValueForBlock(L->getLoopLatch()));3327 if (IncV)3328 ChainInstruction(&PN, IncV, ChainUsersVec);3329 }3330 // Remove any unprofitable chains.3331 unsigned ChainIdx = 0;3332 for (unsigned UsersIdx = 0, NChains = IVChainVec.size();3333 UsersIdx < NChains; ++UsersIdx) {3334 if (!isProfitableChain(IVChainVec[UsersIdx],3335 ChainUsersVec[UsersIdx].FarUsers, SE, TTI))3336 continue;3337 // Preserve the chain at UsesIdx.3338 if (ChainIdx != UsersIdx)3339 IVChainVec[ChainIdx] = IVChainVec[UsersIdx];3340 FinalizeChain(IVChainVec[ChainIdx]);3341 ++ChainIdx;3342 }3343 IVChainVec.resize(ChainIdx);3344}3345 3346void LSRInstance::FinalizeChain(IVChain &Chain) {3347 assert(!Chain.Incs.empty() && "empty IV chains are not allowed");3348 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Final Chain: " << *Chain.Incs[0].UserInst << "\n");3349 3350 for (const IVInc &Inc : Chain) {3351 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inc: " << *Inc.UserInst << "\n");3352 auto UseI = find(Inc.UserInst->operands(), Inc.IVOperand);3353 assert(UseI != Inc.UserInst->op_end() && "cannot find IV operand");3354 IVIncSet.insert(UseI);3355 }3356}3357 3358/// Return true if the IVInc can be folded into an addressing mode.3359static bool canFoldIVIncExpr(const SCEV *IncExpr, Instruction *UserInst,3360 Value *Operand, const TargetTransformInfo &TTI) {3361 const SCEVConstant *IncConst = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(IncExpr);3362 Immediate IncOffset = Immediate::getZero();3363 if (IncConst) {3364 if (IncConst && IncConst->getAPInt().getSignificantBits() > 64)3365 return false;3366 IncOffset = Immediate::getFixed(IncConst->getValue()->getSExtValue());3367 } else {3368 // Look for mul(vscale, constant), to detect a scalable offset.3369 const APInt *C;3370 if (!match(IncExpr, m_scev_Mul(m_scev_APInt(C), m_SCEVVScale())) ||3371 C->getSignificantBits() > 64)3372 return false;3373 IncOffset = Immediate::getScalable(C->getSExtValue());3374 }3375 3376 if (!isAddressUse(TTI, UserInst, Operand))3377 return false;3378 3379 MemAccessTy AccessTy = getAccessType(TTI, UserInst, Operand);3380 if (!isAlwaysFoldable(TTI, LSRUse::Address, AccessTy, /*BaseGV=*/nullptr,3381 IncOffset, /*HasBaseReg=*/false))3382 return false;3383 3384 return true;3385}3386 3387/// Generate an add or subtract for each IVInc in a chain to materialize the IV3388/// user's operand from the previous IV user's operand.3389void LSRInstance::GenerateIVChain(const IVChain &Chain,3390 SmallVectorImpl<WeakTrackingVH> &DeadInsts) {3391 // Find the new IVOperand for the head of the chain. It may have been replaced3392 // by LSR.3393 const IVInc &Head = Chain.Incs[0];3394 User::op_iterator IVOpEnd = Head.UserInst->op_end();3395 // findIVOperand returns IVOpEnd if it can no longer find a valid IV user.3396 User::op_iterator IVOpIter = findIVOperand(Head.UserInst->op_begin(),3397 IVOpEnd, L, SE);3398 Value *IVSrc = nullptr;3399 while (IVOpIter != IVOpEnd) {3400 IVSrc = getWideOperand(*IVOpIter);3401 3402 // If this operand computes the expression that the chain needs, we may use3403 // it. (Check this after setting IVSrc which is used below.)3404 //3405 // Note that if Head.IncExpr is wider than IVSrc, then this phi is too3406 // narrow for the chain, so we can no longer use it. We do allow using a3407 // wider phi, assuming the LSR checked for free truncation. In that case we3408 // should already have a truncate on this operand such that3409 // getSCEV(IVSrc) == IncExpr.3410 if (SE.getSCEV(*IVOpIter) == Head.IncExpr3411 || SE.getSCEV(IVSrc) == Head.IncExpr) {3412 break;3413 }3414 IVOpIter = findIVOperand(std::next(IVOpIter), IVOpEnd, L, SE);3415 }3416 if (IVOpIter == IVOpEnd) {3417 // Gracefully give up on this chain.3418 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Concealed chain head: " << *Head.UserInst << "\n");3419 return;3420 }3421 assert(IVSrc && "Failed to find IV chain source");3422 3423 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Generate chain at: " << *IVSrc << "\n");3424 Type *IVTy = IVSrc->getType();3425 Type *IntTy = SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(IVTy);3426 const SCEV *LeftOverExpr = nullptr;3427 const SCEV *Accum = SE.getZero(IntTy);3428 SmallVector<std::pair<const SCEV *, Value *>> Bases;3429 Bases.emplace_back(Accum, IVSrc);3430 3431 for (const IVInc &Inc : Chain) {3432 Instruction *InsertPt = Inc.UserInst;3433 if (isa<PHINode>(InsertPt))3434 InsertPt = L->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator();3435 3436 // IVOper will replace the current IV User's operand. IVSrc is the IV3437 // value currently held in a register.3438 Value *IVOper = IVSrc;3439 if (!Inc.IncExpr->isZero()) {3440 // IncExpr was the result of subtraction of two narrow values, so must3441 // be signed.3442 const SCEV *IncExpr = SE.getNoopOrSignExtend(Inc.IncExpr, IntTy);3443 Accum = SE.getAddExpr(Accum, IncExpr);3444 LeftOverExpr = LeftOverExpr ?3445 SE.getAddExpr(LeftOverExpr, IncExpr) : IncExpr;3446 }3447 3448 // Look through each base to see if any can produce a nice addressing mode.3449 bool FoundBase = false;3450 for (auto [MapScev, MapIVOper] : reverse(Bases)) {3451 const SCEV *Remainder = SE.getMinusSCEV(Accum, MapScev);3452 if (canFoldIVIncExpr(Remainder, Inc.UserInst, Inc.IVOperand, TTI)) {3453 if (!Remainder->isZero()) {3454 Rewriter.clearPostInc();3455 Value *IncV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(Remainder, IntTy, InsertPt);3456 const SCEV *IVOperExpr =3457 SE.getAddExpr(SE.getUnknown(MapIVOper), SE.getUnknown(IncV));3458 IVOper = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(IVOperExpr, IVTy, InsertPt);3459 } else {3460 IVOper = MapIVOper;3461 }3462 3463 FoundBase = true;3464 break;3465 }3466 }3467 if (!FoundBase && LeftOverExpr && !LeftOverExpr->isZero()) {3468 // Expand the IV increment.3469 Rewriter.clearPostInc();3470 Value *IncV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(LeftOverExpr, IntTy, InsertPt);3471 const SCEV *IVOperExpr = SE.getAddExpr(SE.getUnknown(IVSrc),3472 SE.getUnknown(IncV));3473 IVOper = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(IVOperExpr, IVTy, InsertPt);3474 3475 // If an IV increment can't be folded, use it as the next IV value.3476 if (!canFoldIVIncExpr(LeftOverExpr, Inc.UserInst, Inc.IVOperand, TTI)) {3477 assert(IVTy == IVOper->getType() && "inconsistent IV increment type");3478 Bases.emplace_back(Accum, IVOper);3479 IVSrc = IVOper;3480 LeftOverExpr = nullptr;3481 }3482 }3483 Type *OperTy = Inc.IVOperand->getType();3484 if (IVTy != OperTy) {3485 assert(SE.getTypeSizeInBits(IVTy) >= SE.getTypeSizeInBits(OperTy) &&3486 "cannot extend a chained IV");3487 IRBuilder<> Builder(InsertPt);3488 IVOper = Builder.CreateTruncOrBitCast(IVOper, OperTy, "lsr.chain");3489 }3490 Inc.UserInst->replaceUsesOfWith(Inc.IVOperand, IVOper);3491 if (auto *OperandIsInstr = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Inc.IVOperand))3492 DeadInsts.emplace_back(OperandIsInstr);3493 }3494 // If LSR created a new, wider phi, we may also replace its postinc. We only3495 // do this if we also found a wide value for the head of the chain.3496 if (isa<PHINode>(Chain.tailUserInst())) {3497 for (PHINode &Phi : L->getHeader()->phis()) {3498 if (Phi.getType() != IVSrc->getType())3499 continue;3500 Instruction *PostIncV = dyn_cast<Instruction>(3501 Phi.getIncomingValueForBlock(L->getLoopLatch()));3502 if (!PostIncV || (SE.getSCEV(PostIncV) != SE.getSCEV(IVSrc)))3503 continue;3504 Value *IVOper = IVSrc;3505 Type *PostIncTy = PostIncV->getType();3506 if (IVTy != PostIncTy) {3507 assert(PostIncTy->isPointerTy() && "mixing int/ptr IV types");3508 IRBuilder<> Builder(L->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator());3509 Builder.SetCurrentDebugLocation(PostIncV->getDebugLoc());3510 IVOper = Builder.CreatePointerCast(IVSrc, PostIncTy, "lsr.chain");3511 }3512 Phi.replaceUsesOfWith(PostIncV, IVOper);3513 DeadInsts.emplace_back(PostIncV);3514 }3515 }3516}3517 3518void LSRInstance::CollectFixupsAndInitialFormulae() {3519 BranchInst *ExitBranch = nullptr;3520 bool SaveCmp = TTI.canSaveCmp(L, &ExitBranch, &SE, &LI, &DT, &AC, &TLI);3521 3522 // For calculating baseline cost3523 SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 16> Regs;3524 DenseSet<const SCEV *> VisitedRegs;3525 DenseSet<size_t> VisitedLSRUse;3526 3527 for (const IVStrideUse &U : IU) {3528 Instruction *UserInst = U.getUser();3529 // Skip IV users that are part of profitable IV Chains.3530 User::op_iterator UseI =3531 find(UserInst->operands(), U.getOperandValToReplace());3532 assert(UseI != UserInst->op_end() && "cannot find IV operand");3533 if (IVIncSet.count(UseI)) {3534 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Use is in profitable chain: " << **UseI << '\n');3535 continue;3536 }3537 3538 LSRUse::KindType Kind = LSRUse::Basic;3539 MemAccessTy AccessTy;3540 if (isAddressUse(TTI, UserInst, U.getOperandValToReplace())) {3541 Kind = LSRUse::Address;3542 AccessTy = getAccessType(TTI, UserInst, U.getOperandValToReplace());3543 }3544 3545 const SCEV *S = IU.getExpr(U);3546 if (!S)3547 continue;3548 PostIncLoopSet TmpPostIncLoops = U.getPostIncLoops();3549 3550 // Equality (== and !=) ICmps are special. We can rewrite (i == N) as3551 // (N - i == 0), and this allows (N - i) to be the expression that we work3552 // with rather than just N or i, so we can consider the register3553 // requirements for both N and i at the same time. Limiting this code to3554 // equality icmps is not a problem because all interesting loops use3555 // equality icmps, thanks to IndVarSimplify.3556 if (ICmpInst *CI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(UserInst)) {3557 // If CI can be saved in some target, like replaced inside hardware loop3558 // in PowerPC, no need to generate initial formulae for it.3559 if (SaveCmp && CI == dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(ExitBranch->getCondition()))3560 continue;3561 if (CI->isEquality()) {3562 // Swap the operands if needed to put the OperandValToReplace on the3563 // left, for consistency.3564 Value *NV = CI->getOperand(1);3565 if (NV == U.getOperandValToReplace()) {3566 CI->setOperand(1, CI->getOperand(0));3567 CI->setOperand(0, NV);3568 NV = CI->getOperand(1);3569 Changed = true;3570 }3571 3572 // x == y --> x - y == 03573 const SCEV *N = SE.getSCEV(NV);3574 if (SE.isLoopInvariant(N, L) && Rewriter.isSafeToExpand(N) &&3575 (!NV->getType()->isPointerTy() ||3576 SE.getPointerBase(N) == SE.getPointerBase(S))) {3577 // S is normalized, so normalize N before folding it into S3578 // to keep the result normalized.3579 N = normalizeForPostIncUse(N, TmpPostIncLoops, SE);3580 if (!N)3581 continue;3582 Kind = LSRUse::ICmpZero;3583 S = SE.getMinusSCEV(N, S);3584 } else if (L->isLoopInvariant(NV) &&3585 (!isa<Instruction>(NV) ||3586 DT.dominates(cast<Instruction>(NV), L->getHeader())) &&3587 !NV->getType()->isPointerTy()) {3588 // If we can't generally expand the expression (e.g. it contains3589 // a divide), but it is already at a loop invariant point before the3590 // loop, wrap it in an unknown (to prevent the expander from trying3591 // to re-expand in a potentially unsafe way.) The restriction to3592 // integer types is required because the unknown hides the base, and3593 // SCEV can't compute the difference of two unknown pointers.3594 N = SE.getUnknown(NV);3595 N = normalizeForPostIncUse(N, TmpPostIncLoops, SE);3596 if (!N)3597 continue;3598 Kind = LSRUse::ICmpZero;3599 S = SE.getMinusSCEV(N, S);3600 assert(!isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(S));3601 }3602 3603 // -1 and the negations of all interesting strides (except the negation3604 // of -1) are now also interesting.3605 for (size_t i = 0, e = Factors.size(); i != e; ++i)3606 if (Factors[i] != -1)3607 Factors.insert(-(uint64_t)Factors[i]);3608 Factors.insert(-1);3609 }3610 }3611 3612 // Get or create an LSRUse.3613 std::pair<size_t, Immediate> P = getUse(S, Kind, AccessTy);3614 size_t LUIdx = P.first;3615 Immediate Offset = P.second;3616 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];3617 3618 // Record the fixup.3619 LSRFixup &LF = LU.getNewFixup();3620 LF.UserInst = UserInst;3621 LF.OperandValToReplace = U.getOperandValToReplace();3622 LF.PostIncLoops = TmpPostIncLoops;3623 LF.Offset = Offset;3624 LU.AllFixupsOutsideLoop &= LF.isUseFullyOutsideLoop(L);3625 LU.AllFixupsUnconditional &= IsFixupExecutedEachIncrement(LF);3626 3627 // Create SCEV as Formula for calculating baseline cost3628 if (!VisitedLSRUse.count(LUIdx) && !LF.isUseFullyOutsideLoop(L)) {3629 Formula F;3630 F.initialMatch(S, L, SE);3631 BaselineCost.RateFormula(F, Regs, VisitedRegs, LU,3632 HardwareLoopProfitable);3633 VisitedLSRUse.insert(LUIdx);3634 }3635 3636 if (!LU.WidestFixupType ||3637 SE.getTypeSizeInBits(LU.WidestFixupType) <3638 SE.getTypeSizeInBits(LF.OperandValToReplace->getType()))3639 LU.WidestFixupType = LF.OperandValToReplace->getType();3640 3641 // If this is the first use of this LSRUse, give it a formula.3642 if (LU.Formulae.empty()) {3643 InsertInitialFormula(S, LU, LUIdx);3644 CountRegisters(LU.Formulae.back(), LUIdx);3645 }3646 }3647 3648 LLVM_DEBUG(print_fixups(dbgs()));3649}3650 3651/// Insert a formula for the given expression into the given use, separating out3652/// loop-variant portions from loop-invariant and loop-computable portions.3653void LSRInstance::InsertInitialFormula(const SCEV *S, LSRUse &LU,3654 size_t LUIdx) {3655 // Mark uses whose expressions cannot be expanded.3656 if (!Rewriter.isSafeToExpand(S))3657 LU.RigidFormula = true;3658 3659 Formula F;3660 F.initialMatch(S, L, SE);3661 bool Inserted = InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);3662 assert(Inserted && "Initial formula already exists!"); (void)Inserted;3663}3664 3665/// Insert a simple single-register formula for the given expression into the3666/// given use.3667void3668LSRInstance::InsertSupplementalFormula(const SCEV *S,3669 LSRUse &LU, size_t LUIdx) {3670 Formula F;3671 F.BaseRegs.push_back(S);3672 F.HasBaseReg = true;3673 bool Inserted = InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);3674 assert(Inserted && "Supplemental formula already exists!"); (void)Inserted;3675}3676 3677/// Note which registers are used by the given formula, updating RegUses.3678void LSRInstance::CountRegisters(const Formula &F, size_t LUIdx) {3679 if (F.ScaledReg)3680 RegUses.countRegister(F.ScaledReg, LUIdx);3681 for (const SCEV *BaseReg : F.BaseRegs)3682 RegUses.countRegister(BaseReg, LUIdx);3683}3684 3685/// If the given formula has not yet been inserted, add it to the list, and3686/// return true. Return false otherwise.3687bool LSRInstance::InsertFormula(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, const Formula &F) {3688 // Do not insert formula that we will not be able to expand.3689 assert(isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy, F) &&3690 "Formula is illegal");3691 3692 if (!LU.InsertFormula(F, *L))3693 return false;3694 3695 CountRegisters(F, LUIdx);3696 return true;3697}3698 3699/// Test whether this fixup will be executed each time the corresponding IV3700/// increment instruction is executed.3701bool LSRInstance::IsFixupExecutedEachIncrement(const LSRFixup &LF) const {3702 // If the fixup block dominates the IV increment block then there is no path3703 // through the loop to the increment that doesn't pass through the fixup.3704 return DT.dominates(LF.UserInst->getParent(), IVIncInsertPos->getParent());3705}3706 3707/// Check for other uses of loop-invariant values which we're tracking. These3708/// other uses will pin these values in registers, making them less profitable3709/// for elimination.3710/// TODO: This currently misses non-constant addrec step registers.3711/// TODO: Should this give more weight to users inside the loop?3712void3713LSRInstance::CollectLoopInvariantFixupsAndFormulae() {3714 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> Worklist(RegUses.begin(), RegUses.end());3715 SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 32> Visited;3716 3717 // Don't collect outside uses if we are favoring postinc - the instructions in3718 // the loop are more important than the ones outside of it.3719 if (AMK == TTI::AMK_PostIndexed)3720 return;3721 3722 while (!Worklist.empty()) {3723 const SCEV *S = Worklist.pop_back_val();3724 3725 // Don't process the same SCEV twice3726 if (!Visited.insert(S).second)3727 continue;3728 3729 if (const SCEVNAryExpr *N = dyn_cast<SCEVNAryExpr>(S))3730 append_range(Worklist, N->operands());3731 else if (const SCEVIntegralCastExpr *C = dyn_cast<SCEVIntegralCastExpr>(S))3732 Worklist.push_back(C->getOperand());3733 else if (const SCEVUDivExpr *D = dyn_cast<SCEVUDivExpr>(S)) {3734 Worklist.push_back(D->getLHS());3735 Worklist.push_back(D->getRHS());3736 } else if (const SCEVUnknown *US = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(S)) {3737 const Value *V = US->getValue();3738 if (const Instruction *Inst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V)) {3739 // Look for instructions defined outside the loop.3740 if (L->contains(Inst)) continue;3741 } else if (isa<Constant>(V))3742 // Constants can be re-materialized.3743 continue;3744 for (const Use &U : V->uses()) {3745 const Instruction *UserInst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());3746 // Ignore non-instructions.3747 if (!UserInst)3748 continue;3749 // Don't bother if the instruction is an EHPad.3750 if (UserInst->isEHPad())3751 continue;3752 // Ignore instructions in other functions (as can happen with3753 // Constants).3754 if (UserInst->getParent()->getParent() != L->getHeader()->getParent())3755 continue;3756 // Ignore instructions not dominated by the loop.3757 const BasicBlock *UseBB = !isa<PHINode>(UserInst) ?3758 UserInst->getParent() :3759 cast<PHINode>(UserInst)->getIncomingBlock(3760 PHINode::getIncomingValueNumForOperand(U.getOperandNo()));3761 if (!DT.dominates(L->getHeader(), UseBB))3762 continue;3763 // Don't bother if the instruction is in a BB which ends in an EHPad.3764 if (UseBB->getTerminator()->isEHPad())3765 continue;3766 3767 // Ignore cases in which the currently-examined value could come from3768 // a basic block terminated with an EHPad. This checks all incoming3769 // blocks of the phi node since it is possible that the same incoming3770 // value comes from multiple basic blocks, only some of which may end3771 // in an EHPad. If any of them do, a subsequent rewrite attempt by this3772 // pass would try to insert instructions into an EHPad, hitting an3773 // assertion.3774 if (isa<PHINode>(UserInst)) {3775 const auto *PhiNode = cast<PHINode>(UserInst);3776 bool HasIncompatibleEHPTerminatedBlock = false;3777 llvm::Value *ExpectedValue = U;3778 for (unsigned int I = 0; I < PhiNode->getNumIncomingValues(); I++) {3779 if (PhiNode->getIncomingValue(I) == ExpectedValue) {3780 if (PhiNode->getIncomingBlock(I)->getTerminator()->isEHPad()) {3781 HasIncompatibleEHPTerminatedBlock = true;3782 break;3783 }3784 }3785 }3786 if (HasIncompatibleEHPTerminatedBlock) {3787 continue;3788 }3789 }3790 3791 // Don't bother rewriting PHIs in catchswitch blocks.3792 if (isa<CatchSwitchInst>(UserInst->getParent()->getTerminator()))3793 continue;3794 // Ignore uses which are part of other SCEV expressions, to avoid3795 // analyzing them multiple times.3796 if (SE.isSCEVable(UserInst->getType())) {3797 const SCEV *UserS = SE.getSCEV(const_cast<Instruction *>(UserInst));3798 // If the user is a no-op, look through to its uses.3799 if (!isa<SCEVUnknown>(UserS))3800 continue;3801 if (UserS == US) {3802 Worklist.push_back(3803 SE.getUnknown(const_cast<Instruction *>(UserInst)));3804 continue;3805 }3806 }3807 // Ignore icmp instructions which are already being analyzed.3808 if (const ICmpInst *ICI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(UserInst)) {3809 unsigned OtherIdx = !U.getOperandNo();3810 Value *OtherOp = ICI->getOperand(OtherIdx);3811 if (SE.hasComputableLoopEvolution(SE.getSCEV(OtherOp), L))3812 continue;3813 }3814 3815 // Do not consider uses inside lifetime intrinsics. These are not3816 // actually materialized.3817 if (UserInst->isLifetimeStartOrEnd())3818 continue;3819 3820 std::pair<size_t, Immediate> P =3821 getUse(S, LSRUse::Basic, MemAccessTy());3822 size_t LUIdx = P.first;3823 Immediate Offset = P.second;3824 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];3825 LSRFixup &LF = LU.getNewFixup();3826 LF.UserInst = const_cast<Instruction *>(UserInst);3827 LF.OperandValToReplace = U;3828 LF.Offset = Offset;3829 LU.AllFixupsOutsideLoop &= LF.isUseFullyOutsideLoop(L);3830 LU.AllFixupsUnconditional &= IsFixupExecutedEachIncrement(LF);3831 if (!LU.WidestFixupType ||3832 SE.getTypeSizeInBits(LU.WidestFixupType) <3833 SE.getTypeSizeInBits(LF.OperandValToReplace->getType()))3834 LU.WidestFixupType = LF.OperandValToReplace->getType();3835 InsertSupplementalFormula(US, LU, LUIdx);3836 CountRegisters(LU.Formulae.back(), Uses.size() - 1);3837 break;3838 }3839 }3840 }3841}3842 3843/// Split S into subexpressions which can be pulled out into separate3844/// registers. If C is non-null, multiply each subexpression by C.3845///3846/// Return remainder expression after factoring the subexpressions captured by3847/// Ops. If Ops is complete, return NULL.3848static const SCEV *CollectSubexprs(const SCEV *S, const SCEVConstant *C,3849 SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *> &Ops,3850 const Loop *L,3851 ScalarEvolution &SE,3852 unsigned Depth = 0) {3853 // Arbitrarily cap recursion to protect compile time.3854 if (Depth >= 3)3855 return S;3856 3857 if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S)) {3858 // Break out add operands.3859 for (const SCEV *S : Add->operands()) {3860 const SCEV *Remainder = CollectSubexprs(S, C, Ops, L, SE, Depth+1);3861 if (Remainder)3862 Ops.push_back(C ? SE.getMulExpr(C, Remainder) : Remainder);3863 }3864 return nullptr;3865 }3866 const SCEV *Start, *Step;3867 const SCEVConstant *Op0;3868 const SCEV *Op1;3869 if (match(S, m_scev_AffineAddRec(m_SCEV(Start), m_SCEV(Step)))) {3870 // Split a non-zero base out of an addrec.3871 if (Start->isZero())3872 return S;3873 3874 const SCEV *Remainder = CollectSubexprs(Start, C, Ops, L, SE, Depth + 1);3875 // Split the non-zero AddRec unless it is part of a nested recurrence that3876 // does not pertain to this loop.3877 if (Remainder && (cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)->getLoop() == L ||3878 !isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Remainder))) {3879 Ops.push_back(C ? SE.getMulExpr(C, Remainder) : Remainder);3880 Remainder = nullptr;3881 }3882 if (Remainder != Start) {3883 if (!Remainder)3884 Remainder = SE.getConstant(S->getType(), 0);3885 return SE.getAddRecExpr(Remainder, Step,3886 cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)->getLoop(),3887 // FIXME: AR->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNW)3888 SCEV::FlagAnyWrap);3889 }3890 } else if (match(S, m_scev_Mul(m_SCEVConstant(Op0), m_SCEV(Op1)))) {3891 // Break (C * (a + b + c)) into C*a + C*b + C*c.3892 C = C ? cast<SCEVConstant>(SE.getMulExpr(C, Op0)) : Op0;3893 const SCEV *Remainder = CollectSubexprs(Op1, C, Ops, L, SE, Depth + 1);3894 if (Remainder)3895 Ops.push_back(SE.getMulExpr(C, Remainder));3896 return nullptr;3897 }3898 return S;3899}3900 3901/// Return true if the SCEV represents a value that may end up as a3902/// post-increment operation.3903static bool mayUsePostIncMode(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,3904 LSRUse &LU, const SCEV *S, const Loop *L,3905 ScalarEvolution &SE) {3906 if (LU.Kind != LSRUse::Address ||3907 !LU.AccessTy.getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy())3908 return false;3909 const SCEV *Start;3910 if (!match(S, m_scev_AffineAddRec(m_SCEV(Start), m_SCEVConstant())))3911 return false;3912 // Check if a post-indexed load/store can be used.3913 if (TTI.isIndexedLoadLegal(TTI.MIM_PostInc, S->getType()) ||3914 TTI.isIndexedStoreLegal(TTI.MIM_PostInc, S->getType())) {3915 if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(Start) && SE.isLoopInvariant(Start, L))3916 return true;3917 }3918 return false;3919}3920 3921/// Helper function for LSRInstance::GenerateReassociations.3922void LSRInstance::GenerateReassociationsImpl(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,3923 const Formula &Base,3924 unsigned Depth, size_t Idx,3925 bool IsScaledReg) {3926 const SCEV *BaseReg = IsScaledReg ? Base.ScaledReg : Base.BaseRegs[Idx];3927 // Don't generate reassociations for the base register of a value that3928 // may generate a post-increment operator. The reason is that the3929 // reassociations cause extra base+register formula to be created,3930 // and possibly chosen, but the post-increment is more efficient.3931 if (AMK == TTI::AMK_PostIndexed && mayUsePostIncMode(TTI, LU, BaseReg, L, SE))3932 return;3933 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> AddOps;3934 const SCEV *Remainder = CollectSubexprs(BaseReg, nullptr, AddOps, L, SE);3935 if (Remainder)3936 AddOps.push_back(Remainder);3937 3938 if (AddOps.size() == 1)3939 return;3940 3941 for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator J = AddOps.begin(),3942 JE = AddOps.end();3943 J != JE; ++J) {3944 // Loop-variant "unknown" values are uninteresting; we won't be able to3945 // do anything meaningful with them.3946 if (isa<SCEVUnknown>(*J) && !SE.isLoopInvariant(*J, L))3947 continue;3948 3949 // Don't pull a constant into a register if the constant could be folded3950 // into an immediate field.3951 if (isAlwaysFoldable(TTI, SE, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind,3952 LU.AccessTy, *J, Base.getNumRegs() > 1))3953 continue;3954 3955 // Collect all operands except *J.3956 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> InnerAddOps(std::as_const(AddOps).begin(), J);3957 InnerAddOps.append(std::next(J), std::as_const(AddOps).end());3958 3959 // Don't leave just a constant behind in a register if the constant could3960 // be folded into an immediate field.3961 if (InnerAddOps.size() == 1 &&3962 isAlwaysFoldable(TTI, SE, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind,3963 LU.AccessTy, InnerAddOps[0], Base.getNumRegs() > 1))3964 continue;3965 3966 const SCEV *InnerSum = SE.getAddExpr(InnerAddOps);3967 if (InnerSum->isZero())3968 continue;3969 Formula F = Base;3970 3971 if (F.UnfoldedOffset.isNonZero() && F.UnfoldedOffset.isScalable())3972 continue;3973 3974 // Add the remaining pieces of the add back into the new formula.3975 const SCEVConstant *InnerSumSC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(InnerSum);3976 if (InnerSumSC && SE.getTypeSizeInBits(InnerSumSC->getType()) <= 64 &&3977 TTI.isLegalAddImmediate((uint64_t)F.UnfoldedOffset.getFixedValue() +3978 InnerSumSC->getValue()->getZExtValue())) {3979 F.UnfoldedOffset =3980 Immediate::getFixed((uint64_t)F.UnfoldedOffset.getFixedValue() +3981 InnerSumSC->getValue()->getZExtValue());3982 if (IsScaledReg) {3983 F.ScaledReg = nullptr;3984 F.Scale = 0;3985 } else3986 F.BaseRegs.erase(F.BaseRegs.begin() + Idx);3987 } else if (IsScaledReg)3988 F.ScaledReg = InnerSum;3989 else3990 F.BaseRegs[Idx] = InnerSum;3991 3992 // Add J as its own register, or an unfolded immediate.3993 const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(*J);3994 if (SC && SE.getTypeSizeInBits(SC->getType()) <= 64 &&3995 TTI.isLegalAddImmediate((uint64_t)F.UnfoldedOffset.getFixedValue() +3996 SC->getValue()->getZExtValue()))3997 F.UnfoldedOffset =3998 Immediate::getFixed((uint64_t)F.UnfoldedOffset.getFixedValue() +3999 SC->getValue()->getZExtValue());4000 else4001 F.BaseRegs.push_back(*J);4002 // We may have changed the number of register in base regs, adjust the4003 // formula accordingly.4004 F.canonicalize(*L);4005 4006 if (InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F))4007 // If that formula hadn't been seen before, recurse to find more like4008 // it.4009 // Add check on Log16(AddOps.size()) - same as Log2_32(AddOps.size()) >> 2)4010 // Because just Depth is not enough to bound compile time.4011 // This means that every time AddOps.size() is greater 16^x we will add4012 // x to Depth.4013 GenerateReassociations(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae.back(),4014 Depth + 1 + (Log2_32(AddOps.size()) >> 2));4015 }4016}4017 4018/// Split out subexpressions from adds and the bases of addrecs.4019void LSRInstance::GenerateReassociations(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,4020 Formula Base, unsigned Depth) {4021 assert(Base.isCanonical(*L) && "Input must be in the canonical form");4022 // Arbitrarily cap recursion to protect compile time.4023 if (Depth >= 3)4024 return;4025 4026 for (size_t i = 0, e = Base.BaseRegs.size(); i != e; ++i)4027 GenerateReassociationsImpl(LU, LUIdx, Base, Depth, i);4028 4029 if (Base.Scale == 1)4030 GenerateReassociationsImpl(LU, LUIdx, Base, Depth,4031 /* Idx */ -1, /* IsScaledReg */ true);4032}4033 4034/// Generate a formula consisting of all of the loop-dominating registers added4035/// into a single register.4036void LSRInstance::GenerateCombinations(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,4037 Formula Base) {4038 // This method is only interesting on a plurality of registers.4039 if (Base.BaseRegs.size() + (Base.Scale == 1) +4040 (Base.UnfoldedOffset.isNonZero()) <=4041 1)4042 return;4043 4044 // Flatten the representation, i.e., reg1 + 1*reg2 => reg1 + reg2, before4045 // processing the formula.4046 Base.unscale();4047 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Ops;4048 Formula NewBase = Base;4049 NewBase.BaseRegs.clear();4050 Type *CombinedIntegerType = nullptr;4051 for (const SCEV *BaseReg : Base.BaseRegs) {4052 if (SE.properlyDominates(BaseReg, L->getHeader()) &&4053 !SE.hasComputableLoopEvolution(BaseReg, L)) {4054 if (!CombinedIntegerType)4055 CombinedIntegerType = SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(BaseReg->getType());4056 Ops.push_back(BaseReg);4057 }4058 else4059 NewBase.BaseRegs.push_back(BaseReg);4060 }4061 4062 // If no register is relevant, we're done.4063 if (Ops.size() == 0)4064 return;4065 4066 // Utility function for generating the required variants of the combined4067 // registers.4068 auto GenerateFormula = [&](const SCEV *Sum) {4069 Formula F = NewBase;4070 4071 // TODO: If Sum is zero, it probably means ScalarEvolution missed an4072 // opportunity to fold something. For now, just ignore such cases4073 // rather than proceed with zero in a register.4074 if (Sum->isZero())4075 return;4076 4077 F.BaseRegs.push_back(Sum);4078 F.canonicalize(*L);4079 (void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);4080 };4081 4082 // If we collected at least two registers, generate a formula combining them.4083 if (Ops.size() > 1) {4084 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> OpsCopy(Ops); // Don't let SE modify Ops.4085 GenerateFormula(SE.getAddExpr(OpsCopy));4086 }4087 4088 // If we have an unfolded offset, generate a formula combining it with the4089 // registers collected.4090 if (NewBase.UnfoldedOffset.isNonZero() && NewBase.UnfoldedOffset.isFixed()) {4091 assert(CombinedIntegerType && "Missing a type for the unfolded offset");4092 Ops.push_back(SE.getConstant(CombinedIntegerType,4093 NewBase.UnfoldedOffset.getFixedValue(), true));4094 NewBase.UnfoldedOffset = Immediate::getFixed(0);4095 GenerateFormula(SE.getAddExpr(Ops));4096 }4097}4098 4099/// Helper function for LSRInstance::GenerateSymbolicOffsets.4100void LSRInstance::GenerateSymbolicOffsetsImpl(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,4101 const Formula &Base, size_t Idx,4102 bool IsScaledReg) {4103 const SCEV *G = IsScaledReg ? Base.ScaledReg : Base.BaseRegs[Idx];4104 GlobalValue *GV = ExtractSymbol(G, SE);4105 if (G->isZero() || !GV)4106 return;4107 Formula F = Base;4108 F.BaseGV = GV;4109 if (!isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy, F))4110 return;4111 if (IsScaledReg)4112 F.ScaledReg = G;4113 else4114 F.BaseRegs[Idx] = G;4115 (void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);4116}4117 4118/// Generate reuse formulae using symbolic offsets.4119void LSRInstance::GenerateSymbolicOffsets(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,4120 Formula Base) {4121 // We can't add a symbolic offset if the address already contains one.4122 if (Base.BaseGV) return;4123 4124 for (size_t i = 0, e = Base.BaseRegs.size(); i != e; ++i)4125 GenerateSymbolicOffsetsImpl(LU, LUIdx, Base, i);4126 if (Base.Scale == 1)4127 GenerateSymbolicOffsetsImpl(LU, LUIdx, Base, /* Idx */ -1,4128 /* IsScaledReg */ true);4129}4130 4131/// Helper function for LSRInstance::GenerateConstantOffsets.4132void LSRInstance::GenerateConstantOffsetsImpl(4133 LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, const Formula &Base,4134 const SmallVectorImpl<Immediate> &Worklist, size_t Idx, bool IsScaledReg) {4135 4136 auto GenerateOffset = [&](const SCEV *G, Immediate Offset) {4137 Formula F = Base;4138 if (!Base.BaseOffset.isCompatibleImmediate(Offset))4139 return;4140 F.BaseOffset = Base.BaseOffset.subUnsigned(Offset);4141 4142 if (isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy, F)) {4143 // Add the offset to the base register.4144 const SCEV *NewOffset = Offset.getSCEV(SE, G->getType());4145 const SCEV *NewG = SE.getAddExpr(NewOffset, G);4146 // If it cancelled out, drop the base register, otherwise update it.4147 if (NewG->isZero()) {4148 if (IsScaledReg) {4149 F.Scale = 0;4150 F.ScaledReg = nullptr;4151 } else4152 F.deleteBaseReg(F.BaseRegs[Idx]);4153 F.canonicalize(*L);4154 } else if (IsScaledReg)4155 F.ScaledReg = NewG;4156 else4157 F.BaseRegs[Idx] = NewG;4158 4159 (void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);4160 }4161 };4162 4163 const SCEV *G = IsScaledReg ? Base.ScaledReg : Base.BaseRegs[Idx];4164 4165 // With constant offsets and constant steps, we can generate pre-inc4166 // accesses by having the offset equal the step. So, for access #0 with a4167 // step of 8, we generate a G - 8 base which would require the first access4168 // to be ((G - 8) + 8),+,8. The pre-indexed access then updates the pointer4169 // for itself and hopefully becomes the base for other accesses. This means4170 // means that a single pre-indexed access can be generated to become the new4171 // base pointer for each iteration of the loop, resulting in no extra add/sub4172 // instructions for pointer updating.4173 if ((AMK & TTI::AMK_PreIndexed) && LU.Kind == LSRUse::Address) {4174 const APInt *StepInt;4175 if (match(G, m_scev_AffineAddRec(m_SCEV(), m_scev_APInt(StepInt)))) {4176 int64_t Step = StepInt->isNegative() ? StepInt->getSExtValue()4177 : StepInt->getZExtValue();4178 4179 for (Immediate Offset : Worklist) {4180 if (Offset.isFixed()) {4181 Offset = Immediate::getFixed(Offset.getFixedValue() - Step);4182 GenerateOffset(G, Offset);4183 }4184 }4185 }4186 }4187 for (Immediate Offset : Worklist)4188 GenerateOffset(G, Offset);4189 4190 Immediate Imm = ExtractImmediate(G, SE);4191 if (G->isZero() || Imm.isZero() ||4192 !Base.BaseOffset.isCompatibleImmediate(Imm))4193 return;4194 Formula F = Base;4195 F.BaseOffset = F.BaseOffset.addUnsigned(Imm);4196 if (!isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy, F))4197 return;4198 if (IsScaledReg) {4199 F.ScaledReg = G;4200 } else {4201 F.BaseRegs[Idx] = G;4202 // We may generate non canonical Formula if G is a recurrent expr reg4203 // related with current loop while F.ScaledReg is not.4204 F.canonicalize(*L);4205 }4206 (void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);4207}4208 4209/// GenerateConstantOffsets - Generate reuse formulae using symbolic offsets.4210void LSRInstance::GenerateConstantOffsets(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,4211 Formula Base) {4212 // TODO: For now, just add the min and max offset, because it usually isn't4213 // worthwhile looking at everything inbetween.4214 SmallVector<Immediate, 2> Worklist;4215 Worklist.push_back(LU.MinOffset);4216 if (LU.MaxOffset != LU.MinOffset)4217 Worklist.push_back(LU.MaxOffset);4218 4219 for (size_t i = 0, e = Base.BaseRegs.size(); i != e; ++i)4220 GenerateConstantOffsetsImpl(LU, LUIdx, Base, Worklist, i);4221 if (Base.Scale == 1)4222 GenerateConstantOffsetsImpl(LU, LUIdx, Base, Worklist, /* Idx */ -1,4223 /* IsScaledReg */ true);4224}4225 4226/// For ICmpZero, check to see if we can scale up the comparison. For example, x4227/// == y -> x*c == y*c.4228void LSRInstance::GenerateICmpZeroScales(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,4229 Formula Base) {4230 if (LU.Kind != LSRUse::ICmpZero) return;4231 4232 // Determine the integer type for the base formula.4233 Type *IntTy = Base.getType();4234 if (!IntTy) return;4235 if (SE.getTypeSizeInBits(IntTy) > 64) return;4236 4237 // Don't do this if there is more than one offset.4238 if (LU.MinOffset != LU.MaxOffset) return;4239 4240 // Check if transformation is valid. It is illegal to multiply pointer.4241 if (Base.ScaledReg && Base.ScaledReg->getType()->isPointerTy())4242 return;4243 for (const SCEV *BaseReg : Base.BaseRegs)4244 if (BaseReg->getType()->isPointerTy())4245 return;4246 assert(!Base.BaseGV && "ICmpZero use is not legal!");4247 4248 // Check each interesting stride.4249 for (int64_t Factor : Factors) {4250 // Check that Factor can be represented by IntTy4251 if (!ConstantInt::isValueValidForType(IntTy, Factor))4252 continue;4253 // Check that the multiplication doesn't overflow.4254 if (Base.BaseOffset.isMin() && Factor == -1)4255 continue;4256 // Not supporting scalable immediates.4257 if (Base.BaseOffset.isNonZero() && Base.BaseOffset.isScalable())4258 continue;4259 Immediate NewBaseOffset = Base.BaseOffset.mulUnsigned(Factor);4260 assert(Factor != 0 && "Zero factor not expected!");4261 if (NewBaseOffset.getFixedValue() / Factor !=4262 Base.BaseOffset.getFixedValue())4263 continue;4264 // If the offset will be truncated at this use, check that it is in bounds.4265 if (!IntTy->isPointerTy() &&4266 !ConstantInt::isValueValidForType(IntTy, NewBaseOffset.getFixedValue()))4267 continue;4268 4269 // Check that multiplying with the use offset doesn't overflow.4270 Immediate Offset = LU.MinOffset;4271 if (Offset.isMin() && Factor == -1)4272 continue;4273 Offset = Offset.mulUnsigned(Factor);4274 if (Offset.getFixedValue() / Factor != LU.MinOffset.getFixedValue())4275 continue;4276 // If the offset will be truncated at this use, check that it is in bounds.4277 if (!IntTy->isPointerTy() &&4278 !ConstantInt::isValueValidForType(IntTy, Offset.getFixedValue()))4279 continue;4280 4281 Formula F = Base;4282 F.BaseOffset = NewBaseOffset;4283 4284 // Check that this scale is legal.4285 if (!isLegalUse(TTI, Offset, Offset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy, F))4286 continue;4287 4288 // Compensate for the use having MinOffset built into it.4289 F.BaseOffset = F.BaseOffset.addUnsigned(Offset).subUnsigned(LU.MinOffset);4290 4291 const SCEV *FactorS = SE.getConstant(IntTy, Factor);4292 4293 // Check that multiplying with each base register doesn't overflow.4294 for (size_t i = 0, e = F.BaseRegs.size(); i != e; ++i) {4295 F.BaseRegs[i] = SE.getMulExpr(F.BaseRegs[i], FactorS);4296 if (getExactSDiv(F.BaseRegs[i], FactorS, SE) != Base.BaseRegs[i])4297 goto next;4298 }4299 4300 // Check that multiplying with the scaled register doesn't overflow.4301 if (F.ScaledReg) {4302 F.ScaledReg = SE.getMulExpr(F.ScaledReg, FactorS);4303 if (getExactSDiv(F.ScaledReg, FactorS, SE) != Base.ScaledReg)4304 continue;4305 }4306 4307 // Check that multiplying with the unfolded offset doesn't overflow.4308 if (F.UnfoldedOffset.isNonZero()) {4309 if (F.UnfoldedOffset.isMin() && Factor == -1)4310 continue;4311 F.UnfoldedOffset = F.UnfoldedOffset.mulUnsigned(Factor);4312 if (F.UnfoldedOffset.getFixedValue() / Factor !=4313 Base.UnfoldedOffset.getFixedValue())4314 continue;4315 // If the offset will be truncated, check that it is in bounds.4316 if (!IntTy->isPointerTy() && !ConstantInt::isValueValidForType(4317 IntTy, F.UnfoldedOffset.getFixedValue()))4318 continue;4319 }4320 4321 // If we make it here and it's legal, add it.4322 (void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);4323 next:;4324 }4325}4326 4327/// Generate stride factor reuse formulae by making use of scaled-offset address4328/// modes, for example.4329void LSRInstance::GenerateScales(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base) {4330 // Determine the integer type for the base formula.4331 Type *IntTy = Base.getType();4332 if (!IntTy) return;4333 4334 // If this Formula already has a scaled register, we can't add another one.4335 // Try to unscale the formula to generate a better scale.4336 if (Base.Scale != 0 && !Base.unscale())4337 return;4338 4339 assert(Base.Scale == 0 && "unscale did not did its job!");4340 4341 // Check each interesting stride.4342 for (int64_t Factor : Factors) {4343 Base.Scale = Factor;4344 Base.HasBaseReg = Base.BaseRegs.size() > 1;4345 // Check whether this scale is going to be legal.4346 if (!isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy,4347 Base)) {4348 // As a special-case, handle special out-of-loop Basic users specially.4349 // TODO: Reconsider this special case.4350 if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::Basic &&4351 isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LSRUse::Special,4352 LU.AccessTy, Base) &&4353 LU.AllFixupsOutsideLoop)4354 LU.Kind = LSRUse::Special;4355 else4356 continue;4357 }4358 // For an ICmpZero, negating a solitary base register won't lead to4359 // new solutions.4360 if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero && !Base.HasBaseReg &&4361 Base.BaseOffset.isZero() && !Base.BaseGV)4362 continue;4363 // For each addrec base reg, if its loop is current loop, apply the scale.4364 for (size_t i = 0, e = Base.BaseRegs.size(); i != e; ++i) {4365 const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Base.BaseRegs[i]);4366 if (AR && (AR->getLoop() == L || LU.AllFixupsOutsideLoop)) {4367 const SCEV *FactorS = SE.getConstant(IntTy, Factor);4368 if (FactorS->isZero())4369 continue;4370 // Divide out the factor, ignoring high bits, since we'll be4371 // scaling the value back up in the end.4372 if (const SCEV *Quotient = getExactSDiv(AR, FactorS, SE, true))4373 if (!Quotient->isZero()) {4374 // TODO: This could be optimized to avoid all the copying.4375 Formula F = Base;4376 F.ScaledReg = Quotient;4377 F.deleteBaseReg(F.BaseRegs[i]);4378 // The canonical representation of 1*reg is reg, which is already in4379 // Base. In that case, do not try to insert the formula, it will be4380 // rejected anyway.4381 if (F.Scale == 1 && (F.BaseRegs.empty() ||4382 (AR->getLoop() != L && LU.AllFixupsOutsideLoop)))4383 continue;4384 // If AllFixupsOutsideLoop is true and F.Scale is 1, we may generate4385 // non canonical Formula with ScaledReg's loop not being L.4386 if (F.Scale == 1 && LU.AllFixupsOutsideLoop)4387 F.canonicalize(*L);4388 (void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);4389 }4390 }4391 }4392 }4393}4394 4395/// Extend/Truncate \p Expr to \p ToTy considering post-inc uses in \p Loops.4396/// For all PostIncLoopSets in \p Loops, first de-normalize \p Expr, then4397/// perform the extension/truncate and normalize again, as the normalized form4398/// can result in folds that are not valid in the post-inc use contexts. The4399/// expressions for all PostIncLoopSets must match, otherwise return nullptr.4400static const SCEV *4401getAnyExtendConsideringPostIncUses(ArrayRef<PostIncLoopSet> Loops,4402 const SCEV *Expr, Type *ToTy,4403 ScalarEvolution &SE) {4404 const SCEV *Result = nullptr;4405 for (auto &L : Loops) {4406 auto *DenormExpr = denormalizeForPostIncUse(Expr, L, SE);4407 const SCEV *NewDenormExpr = SE.getAnyExtendExpr(DenormExpr, ToTy);4408 const SCEV *New = normalizeForPostIncUse(NewDenormExpr, L, SE);4409 if (!New || (Result && New != Result))4410 return nullptr;4411 Result = New;4412 }4413 4414 assert(Result && "failed to create expression");4415 return Result;4416}4417 4418/// Generate reuse formulae from different IV types.4419void LSRInstance::GenerateTruncates(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base) {4420 // Don't bother truncating symbolic values.4421 if (Base.BaseGV) return;4422 4423 // Determine the integer type for the base formula.4424 Type *DstTy = Base.getType();4425 if (!DstTy) return;4426 if (DstTy->isPointerTy())4427 return;4428 4429 // It is invalid to extend a pointer type so exit early if ScaledReg or4430 // any of the BaseRegs are pointers.4431 if (Base.ScaledReg && Base.ScaledReg->getType()->isPointerTy())4432 return;4433 if (any_of(Base.BaseRegs,4434 [](const SCEV *S) { return S->getType()->isPointerTy(); }))4435 return;4436 4437 SmallVector<PostIncLoopSet> Loops;4438 for (auto &LF : LU.Fixups)4439 Loops.push_back(LF.PostIncLoops);4440 4441 for (Type *SrcTy : Types) {4442 if (SrcTy != DstTy && TTI.isTruncateFree(SrcTy, DstTy)) {4443 Formula F = Base;4444 4445 // Sometimes SCEV is able to prove zero during ext transform. It may4446 // happen if SCEV did not do all possible transforms while creating the4447 // initial node (maybe due to depth limitations), but it can do them while4448 // taking ext.4449 if (F.ScaledReg) {4450 const SCEV *NewScaledReg =4451 getAnyExtendConsideringPostIncUses(Loops, F.ScaledReg, SrcTy, SE);4452 if (!NewScaledReg || NewScaledReg->isZero())4453 continue;4454 F.ScaledReg = NewScaledReg;4455 }4456 bool HasZeroBaseReg = false;4457 for (const SCEV *&BaseReg : F.BaseRegs) {4458 const SCEV *NewBaseReg =4459 getAnyExtendConsideringPostIncUses(Loops, BaseReg, SrcTy, SE);4460 if (!NewBaseReg || NewBaseReg->isZero()) {4461 HasZeroBaseReg = true;4462 break;4463 }4464 BaseReg = NewBaseReg;4465 }4466 if (HasZeroBaseReg)4467 continue;4468 4469 // TODO: This assumes we've done basic processing on all uses and4470 // have an idea what the register usage is.4471 if (!F.hasRegsUsedByUsesOtherThan(LUIdx, RegUses))4472 continue;4473 4474 F.canonicalize(*L);4475 (void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);4476 }4477 }4478}4479 4480namespace {4481 4482/// Helper class for GenerateCrossUseConstantOffsets. It's used to defer4483/// modifications so that the search phase doesn't have to worry about the data4484/// structures moving underneath it.4485struct WorkItem {4486 size_t LUIdx;4487 Immediate Imm;4488 const SCEV *OrigReg;4489 4490 WorkItem(size_t LI, Immediate I, const SCEV *R)4491 : LUIdx(LI), Imm(I), OrigReg(R) {}4492 4493 void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;4494 void dump() const;4495};4496 4497} // end anonymous namespace4498 4499#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)4500void WorkItem::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {4501 OS << "in formulae referencing " << *OrigReg << " in use " << LUIdx4502 << " , add offset " << Imm;4503}4504 4505LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void WorkItem::dump() const {4506 print(errs()); errs() << '\n';4507}4508#endif4509 4510/// Look for registers which are a constant distance apart and try to form reuse4511/// opportunities between them.4512void LSRInstance::GenerateCrossUseConstantOffsets() {4513 // Group the registers by their value without any added constant offset.4514 using ImmMapTy = std::map<Immediate, const SCEV *, KeyOrderTargetImmediate>;4515 4516 DenseMap<const SCEV *, ImmMapTy> Map;4517 DenseMap<const SCEV *, SmallBitVector> UsedByIndicesMap;4518 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> Sequence;4519 for (const SCEV *Use : RegUses) {4520 const SCEV *Reg = Use; // Make a copy for ExtractImmediate to modify.4521 Immediate Imm = ExtractImmediate(Reg, SE);4522 auto Pair = Map.try_emplace(Reg);4523 if (Pair.second)4524 Sequence.push_back(Reg);4525 Pair.first->second.insert(std::make_pair(Imm, Use));4526 UsedByIndicesMap[Reg] |= RegUses.getUsedByIndices(Use);4527 }4528 4529 // Now examine each set of registers with the same base value. Build up4530 // a list of work to do and do the work in a separate step so that we're4531 // not adding formulae and register counts while we're searching.4532 SmallVector<WorkItem, 32> WorkItems;4533 SmallSet<std::pair<size_t, Immediate>, 32, KeyOrderSizeTAndImmediate>4534 UniqueItems;4535 for (const SCEV *Reg : Sequence) {4536 const ImmMapTy &Imms = Map.find(Reg)->second;4537 4538 // It's not worthwhile looking for reuse if there's only one offset.4539 if (Imms.size() == 1)4540 continue;4541 4542 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Generating cross-use offsets for " << *Reg << ':';4543 for (const auto &Entry4544 : Imms) dbgs()4545 << ' ' << Entry.first;4546 dbgs() << '\n');4547 4548 // Examine each offset.4549 for (ImmMapTy::const_iterator J = Imms.begin(), JE = Imms.end();4550 J != JE; ++J) {4551 const SCEV *OrigReg = J->second;4552 4553 Immediate JImm = J->first;4554 const SmallBitVector &UsedByIndices = RegUses.getUsedByIndices(OrigReg);4555 4556 if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(OrigReg) &&4557 UsedByIndicesMap[Reg].count() == 1) {4558 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Skipping cross-use reuse for " << *OrigReg4559 << '\n');4560 continue;4561 }4562 4563 // Conservatively examine offsets between this orig reg a few selected4564 // other orig regs.4565 Immediate First = Imms.begin()->first;4566 Immediate Last = std::prev(Imms.end())->first;4567 if (!First.isCompatibleImmediate(Last)) {4568 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Skipping cross-use reuse for " << *OrigReg4569 << "\n");4570 continue;4571 }4572 // Only scalable if both terms are scalable, or if one is scalable and4573 // the other is 0.4574 bool Scalable = First.isScalable() || Last.isScalable();4575 int64_t FI = First.getKnownMinValue();4576 int64_t LI = Last.getKnownMinValue();4577 // Compute (First + Last) / 2 without overflow using the fact that4578 // First + Last = 2 * (First + Last) + (First ^ Last).4579 int64_t Avg = (FI & LI) + ((FI ^ LI) >> 1);4580 // If the result is negative and FI is odd and LI even (or vice versa),4581 // we rounded towards -inf. Add 1 in that case, to round towards 0.4582 Avg = Avg + ((FI ^ LI) & ((uint64_t)Avg >> 63));4583 ImmMapTy::const_iterator OtherImms[] = {4584 Imms.begin(), std::prev(Imms.end()),4585 Imms.lower_bound(Immediate::get(Avg, Scalable))};4586 for (const auto &M : OtherImms) {4587 if (M == J || M == JE) continue;4588 if (!JImm.isCompatibleImmediate(M->first))4589 continue;4590 4591 // Compute the difference between the two.4592 Immediate Imm = JImm.subUnsigned(M->first);4593 for (unsigned LUIdx : UsedByIndices.set_bits())4594 // Make a memo of this use, offset, and register tuple.4595 if (UniqueItems.insert(std::make_pair(LUIdx, Imm)).second)4596 WorkItems.push_back(WorkItem(LUIdx, Imm, OrigReg));4597 }4598 }4599 }4600 4601 Map.clear();4602 Sequence.clear();4603 UsedByIndicesMap.clear();4604 UniqueItems.clear();4605 4606 // Now iterate through the worklist and add new formulae.4607 for (const WorkItem &WI : WorkItems) {4608 size_t LUIdx = WI.LUIdx;4609 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];4610 Immediate Imm = WI.Imm;4611 const SCEV *OrigReg = WI.OrigReg;4612 4613 Type *IntTy = SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(OrigReg->getType());4614 const SCEV *NegImmS = Imm.getNegativeSCEV(SE, IntTy);4615 unsigned BitWidth = SE.getTypeSizeInBits(IntTy);4616 4617 // TODO: Use a more targeted data structure.4618 for (size_t L = 0, LE = LU.Formulae.size(); L != LE; ++L) {4619 Formula F = LU.Formulae[L];4620 // FIXME: The code for the scaled and unscaled registers looks4621 // very similar but slightly different. Investigate if they4622 // could be merged. That way, we would not have to unscale the4623 // Formula.4624 F.unscale();4625 // Use the immediate in the scaled register.4626 if (F.ScaledReg == OrigReg) {4627 if (!F.BaseOffset.isCompatibleImmediate(Imm))4628 continue;4629 Immediate Offset = F.BaseOffset.addUnsigned(Imm.mulUnsigned(F.Scale));4630 // Don't create 50 + reg(-50).4631 const SCEV *S = Offset.getNegativeSCEV(SE, IntTy);4632 if (F.referencesReg(S))4633 continue;4634 Formula NewF = F;4635 NewF.BaseOffset = Offset;4636 if (!isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy,4637 NewF))4638 continue;4639 NewF.ScaledReg = SE.getAddExpr(NegImmS, NewF.ScaledReg);4640 4641 // If the new scale is a constant in a register, and adding the constant4642 // value to the immediate would produce a value closer to zero than the4643 // immediate itself, then the formula isn't worthwhile.4644 if (const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(NewF.ScaledReg)) {4645 // FIXME: Do we need to do something for scalable immediates here?4646 // A scalable SCEV won't be constant, but we might still have4647 // something in the offset? Bail out for now to be safe.4648 if (NewF.BaseOffset.isNonZero() && NewF.BaseOffset.isScalable())4649 continue;4650 if (C->getValue()->isNegative() !=4651 (NewF.BaseOffset.isLessThanZero()) &&4652 (C->getAPInt().abs() * APInt(BitWidth, F.Scale))4653 .ule(std::abs(NewF.BaseOffset.getFixedValue())))4654 continue;4655 }4656 4657 // OK, looks good.4658 NewF.canonicalize(*this->L);4659 (void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, NewF);4660 } else {4661 // Use the immediate in a base register.4662 for (size_t N = 0, NE = F.BaseRegs.size(); N != NE; ++N) {4663 const SCEV *BaseReg = F.BaseRegs[N];4664 if (BaseReg != OrigReg)4665 continue;4666 Formula NewF = F;4667 if (!NewF.BaseOffset.isCompatibleImmediate(Imm) ||4668 !NewF.UnfoldedOffset.isCompatibleImmediate(Imm) ||4669 !NewF.BaseOffset.isCompatibleImmediate(NewF.UnfoldedOffset))4670 continue;4671 NewF.BaseOffset = NewF.BaseOffset.addUnsigned(Imm);4672 if (!isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset,4673 LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy, NewF)) {4674 if (AMK == TTI::AMK_PostIndexed &&4675 mayUsePostIncMode(TTI, LU, OrigReg, this->L, SE))4676 continue;4677 Immediate NewUnfoldedOffset = NewF.UnfoldedOffset.addUnsigned(Imm);4678 if (!isLegalAddImmediate(TTI, NewUnfoldedOffset))4679 continue;4680 NewF = F;4681 NewF.UnfoldedOffset = NewUnfoldedOffset;4682 }4683 NewF.BaseRegs[N] = SE.getAddExpr(NegImmS, BaseReg);4684 4685 // If the new formula has a constant in a register, and adding the4686 // constant value to the immediate would produce a value closer to4687 // zero than the immediate itself, then the formula isn't worthwhile.4688 for (const SCEV *NewReg : NewF.BaseRegs)4689 if (const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(NewReg)) {4690 if (NewF.BaseOffset.isNonZero() && NewF.BaseOffset.isScalable())4691 goto skip_formula;4692 if ((C->getAPInt() + NewF.BaseOffset.getFixedValue())4693 .abs()4694 .slt(std::abs(NewF.BaseOffset.getFixedValue())) &&4695 (C->getAPInt() + NewF.BaseOffset.getFixedValue())4696 .countr_zero() >=4697 (unsigned)llvm::countr_zero<uint64_t>(4698 NewF.BaseOffset.getFixedValue()))4699 goto skip_formula;4700 }4701 4702 // Ok, looks good.4703 NewF.canonicalize(*this->L);4704 (void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, NewF);4705 break;4706 skip_formula:;4707 }4708 }4709 }4710 }4711}4712 4713/// Generate formulae for each use.4714void4715LSRInstance::GenerateAllReuseFormulae() {4716 // This is split into multiple loops so that hasRegsUsedByUsesOtherThan4717 // queries are more precise.4718 for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {4719 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];4720 for (size_t i = 0, f = LU.Formulae.size(); i != f; ++i)4721 GenerateReassociations(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae[i]);4722 for (size_t i = 0, f = LU.Formulae.size(); i != f; ++i)4723 GenerateCombinations(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae[i]);4724 }4725 for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {4726 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];4727 for (size_t i = 0, f = LU.Formulae.size(); i != f; ++i)4728 GenerateSymbolicOffsets(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae[i]);4729 for (size_t i = 0, f = LU.Formulae.size(); i != f; ++i)4730 GenerateConstantOffsets(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae[i]);4731 for (size_t i = 0, f = LU.Formulae.size(); i != f; ++i)4732 GenerateICmpZeroScales(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae[i]);4733 for (size_t i = 0, f = LU.Formulae.size(); i != f; ++i)4734 GenerateScales(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae[i]);4735 }4736 for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {4737 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];4738 for (size_t i = 0, f = LU.Formulae.size(); i != f; ++i)4739 GenerateTruncates(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae[i]);4740 }4741 4742 GenerateCrossUseConstantOffsets();4743 4744 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\n"4745 "After generating reuse formulae:\n";4746 print_uses(dbgs()));4747}4748 4749/// If there are multiple formulae with the same set of registers used4750/// by other uses, pick the best one and delete the others.4751void LSRInstance::FilterOutUndesirableDedicatedRegisters() {4752 DenseSet<const SCEV *> VisitedRegs;4753 SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 16> Regs;4754 SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 16> LoserRegs;4755#ifndef NDEBUG4756 bool ChangedFormulae = false;4757#endif4758 4759 // Collect the best formula for each unique set of shared registers. This4760 // is reset for each use.4761 using BestFormulaeTy = DenseMap<SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4>, size_t>;4762 4763 BestFormulaeTy BestFormulae;4764 4765 for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {4766 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];4767 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Filtering for use "; LU.print(dbgs());4768 dbgs() << '\n');4769 4770 bool Any = false;4771 for (size_t FIdx = 0, NumForms = LU.Formulae.size();4772 FIdx != NumForms; ++FIdx) {4773 Formula &F = LU.Formulae[FIdx];4774 4775 // Some formulas are instant losers. For example, they may depend on4776 // nonexistent AddRecs from other loops. These need to be filtered4777 // immediately, otherwise heuristics could choose them over others leading4778 // to an unsatisfactory solution. Passing LoserRegs into RateFormula here4779 // avoids the need to recompute this information across formulae using the4780 // same bad AddRec. Passing LoserRegs is also essential unless we remove4781 // the corresponding bad register from the Regs set.4782 Cost CostF(L, SE, TTI, AMK);4783 Regs.clear();4784 CostF.RateFormula(F, Regs, VisitedRegs, LU, HardwareLoopProfitable,4785 &LoserRegs);4786 if (CostF.isLoser()) {4787 // During initial formula generation, undesirable formulae are generated4788 // by uses within other loops that have some non-trivial address mode or4789 // use the postinc form of the IV. LSR needs to provide these formulae4790 // as the basis of rediscovering the desired formula that uses an AddRec4791 // corresponding to the existing phi. Once all formulae have been4792 // generated, these initial losers may be pruned.4793 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Filtering loser "; F.print(dbgs());4794 dbgs() << "\n");4795 }4796 else {4797 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Key;4798 for (const SCEV *Reg : F.BaseRegs) {4799 if (RegUses.isRegUsedByUsesOtherThan(Reg, LUIdx))4800 Key.push_back(Reg);4801 }4802 if (F.ScaledReg &&4803 RegUses.isRegUsedByUsesOtherThan(F.ScaledReg, LUIdx))4804 Key.push_back(F.ScaledReg);4805 // Unstable sort by host order ok, because this is only used for4806 // uniquifying.4807 llvm::sort(Key);4808 4809 std::pair<BestFormulaeTy::const_iterator, bool> P =4810 BestFormulae.insert(std::make_pair(Key, FIdx));4811 if (P.second)4812 continue;4813 4814 Formula &Best = LU.Formulae[P.first->second];4815 4816 Cost CostBest(L, SE, TTI, AMK);4817 Regs.clear();4818 CostBest.RateFormula(Best, Regs, VisitedRegs, LU,4819 HardwareLoopProfitable);4820 if (CostF.isLess(CostBest))4821 std::swap(F, Best);4822 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Filtering out formula "; F.print(dbgs());4823 dbgs() << "\n"4824 " in favor of formula ";4825 Best.print(dbgs()); dbgs() << '\n');4826 }4827#ifndef NDEBUG4828 ChangedFormulae = true;4829#endif4830 LU.DeleteFormula(F);4831 --FIdx;4832 --NumForms;4833 Any = true;4834 }4835 4836 // Now that we've filtered out some formulae, recompute the Regs set.4837 if (Any)4838 LU.RecomputeRegs(LUIdx, RegUses);4839 4840 // Reset this to prepare for the next use.4841 BestFormulae.clear();4842 }4843 4844 LLVM_DEBUG(if (ChangedFormulae) {4845 dbgs() << "\n"4846 "After filtering out undesirable candidates:\n";4847 print_uses(dbgs());4848 });4849}4850 4851/// Estimate the worst-case number of solutions the solver might have to4852/// consider. It almost never considers this many solutions because it prune the4853/// search space, but the pruning isn't always sufficient.4854size_t LSRInstance::EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() const {4855 size_t Power = 1;4856 for (const LSRUse &LU : Uses) {4857 size_t FSize = LU.Formulae.size();4858 if (FSize >= ComplexityLimit) {4859 Power = ComplexityLimit;4860 break;4861 }4862 Power *= FSize;4863 if (Power >= ComplexityLimit)4864 break;4865 }4866 return Power;4867}4868 4869/// When one formula uses a superset of the registers of another formula, it4870/// won't help reduce register pressure (though it may not necessarily hurt4871/// register pressure); remove it to simplify the system.4872void LSRInstance::NarrowSearchSpaceByDetectingSupersets() {4873 if (EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() >= ComplexityLimit) {4874 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "The search space is too complex.\n");4875 4876 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Narrowing the search space by eliminating formulae "4877 "which use a superset of registers used by other "4878 "formulae.\n");4879 4880 for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {4881 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];4882 bool Any = false;4883 for (size_t i = 0, e = LU.Formulae.size(); i != e; ++i) {4884 Formula &F = LU.Formulae[i];4885 if (F.BaseOffset.isNonZero() && F.BaseOffset.isScalable())4886 continue;4887 // Look for a formula with a constant or GV in a register. If the use4888 // also has a formula with that same value in an immediate field,4889 // delete the one that uses a register.4890 for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator4891 I = F.BaseRegs.begin(), E = F.BaseRegs.end(); I != E; ++I) {4892 if (const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(*I)) {4893 Formula NewF = F;4894 //FIXME: Formulas should store bitwidth to do wrapping properly.4895 // See PR41034.4896 NewF.BaseOffset =4897 Immediate::getFixed(NewF.BaseOffset.getFixedValue() +4898 (uint64_t)C->getValue()->getSExtValue());4899 NewF.BaseRegs.erase(NewF.BaseRegs.begin() +4900 (I - F.BaseRegs.begin()));4901 if (LU.HasFormulaWithSameRegs(NewF)) {4902 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Deleting "; F.print(dbgs());4903 dbgs() << '\n');4904 LU.DeleteFormula(F);4905 --i;4906 --e;4907 Any = true;4908 break;4909 }4910 } else if (const SCEVUnknown *U = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(*I)) {4911 if (GlobalValue *GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(U->getValue()))4912 if (!F.BaseGV) {4913 Formula NewF = F;4914 NewF.BaseGV = GV;4915 NewF.BaseRegs.erase(NewF.BaseRegs.begin() +4916 (I - F.BaseRegs.begin()));4917 if (LU.HasFormulaWithSameRegs(NewF)) {4918 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Deleting "; F.print(dbgs());4919 dbgs() << '\n');4920 LU.DeleteFormula(F);4921 --i;4922 --e;4923 Any = true;4924 break;4925 }4926 }4927 }4928 }4929 }4930 if (Any)4931 LU.RecomputeRegs(LUIdx, RegUses);4932 }4933 4934 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "After pre-selection:\n"; print_uses(dbgs()));4935 }4936}4937 4938/// When there are many registers for expressions like A, A+1, A+2, etc.,4939/// allocate a single register for them.4940void LSRInstance::NarrowSearchSpaceByCollapsingUnrolledCode() {4941 if (EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() < ComplexityLimit)4942 return;4943 4944 LLVM_DEBUG(4945 dbgs() << "The search space is too complex.\n"4946 "Narrowing the search space by assuming that uses separated "4947 "by a constant offset will use the same registers.\n");4948 4949 // This is especially useful for unrolled loops.4950 4951 for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {4952 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];4953 for (const Formula &F : LU.Formulae) {4954 if (F.BaseOffset.isZero() || (F.Scale != 0 && F.Scale != 1))4955 continue;4956 4957 LSRUse *LUThatHas = FindUseWithSimilarFormula(F, LU);4958 if (!LUThatHas)4959 continue;4960 4961 if (!reconcileNewOffset(*LUThatHas, F.BaseOffset, /*HasBaseReg=*/ false,4962 LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy))4963 continue;4964 4965 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Deleting use "; LU.print(dbgs()); dbgs() << '\n');4966 4967 LUThatHas->AllFixupsOutsideLoop &= LU.AllFixupsOutsideLoop;4968 LUThatHas->AllFixupsUnconditional &= LU.AllFixupsUnconditional;4969 4970 // Transfer the fixups of LU to LUThatHas.4971 for (LSRFixup &Fixup : LU.Fixups) {4972 Fixup.Offset += F.BaseOffset;4973 LUThatHas->pushFixup(Fixup);4974 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "New fixup has offset " << Fixup.Offset << '\n');4975 }4976 4977 // Delete formulae from the new use which are no longer legal.4978 bool Any = false;4979 for (size_t i = 0, e = LUThatHas->Formulae.size(); i != e; ++i) {4980 Formula &F = LUThatHas->Formulae[i];4981 if (!isLegalUse(TTI, LUThatHas->MinOffset, LUThatHas->MaxOffset,4982 LUThatHas->Kind, LUThatHas->AccessTy, F)) {4983 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Deleting "; F.print(dbgs()); dbgs() << '\n');4984 LUThatHas->DeleteFormula(F);4985 --i;4986 --e;4987 Any = true;4988 }4989 }4990 4991 if (Any)4992 LUThatHas->RecomputeRegs(LUThatHas - &Uses.front(), RegUses);4993 4994 // Delete the old use.4995 DeleteUse(LU, LUIdx);4996 --LUIdx;4997 --NumUses;4998 break;4999 }5000 }5001 5002 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "After pre-selection:\n"; print_uses(dbgs()));5003}5004 5005/// Call FilterOutUndesirableDedicatedRegisters again, if necessary, now that5006/// we've done more filtering, as it may be able to find more formulae to5007/// eliminate.5008void LSRInstance::NarrowSearchSpaceByRefilteringUndesirableDedicatedRegisters(){5009 if (EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() >= ComplexityLimit) {5010 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "The search space is too complex.\n");5011 5012 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Narrowing the search space by re-filtering out "5013 "undesirable dedicated registers.\n");5014 5015 FilterOutUndesirableDedicatedRegisters();5016 5017 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "After pre-selection:\n"; print_uses(dbgs()));5018 }5019}5020 5021/// If a LSRUse has multiple formulae with the same ScaledReg and Scale.5022/// Pick the best one and delete the others.5023/// This narrowing heuristic is to keep as many formulae with different5024/// Scale and ScaledReg pair as possible while narrowing the search space.5025/// The benefit is that it is more likely to find out a better solution5026/// from a formulae set with more Scale and ScaledReg variations than5027/// a formulae set with the same Scale and ScaledReg. The picking winner5028/// reg heuristic will often keep the formulae with the same Scale and5029/// ScaledReg and filter others, and we want to avoid that if possible.5030void LSRInstance::NarrowSearchSpaceByFilterFormulaWithSameScaledReg() {5031 if (EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() < ComplexityLimit)5032 return;5033 5034 LLVM_DEBUG(5035 dbgs() << "The search space is too complex.\n"5036 "Narrowing the search space by choosing the best Formula "5037 "from the Formulae with the same Scale and ScaledReg.\n");5038 5039 // Map the "Scale * ScaledReg" pair to the best formula of current LSRUse.5040 using BestFormulaeTy = DenseMap<std::pair<const SCEV *, int64_t>, size_t>;5041 5042 BestFormulaeTy BestFormulae;5043#ifndef NDEBUG5044 bool ChangedFormulae = false;5045#endif5046 DenseSet<const SCEV *> VisitedRegs;5047 SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 16> Regs;5048 5049 for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {5050 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];5051 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Filtering for use "; LU.print(dbgs());5052 dbgs() << '\n');5053 5054 // Return true if Formula FA is better than Formula FB.5055 auto IsBetterThan = [&](Formula &FA, Formula &FB) {5056 // First we will try to choose the Formula with fewer new registers.5057 // For a register used by current Formula, the more the register is5058 // shared among LSRUses, the less we increase the register number5059 // counter of the formula.5060 size_t FARegNum = 0;5061 for (const SCEV *Reg : FA.BaseRegs) {5062 const SmallBitVector &UsedByIndices = RegUses.getUsedByIndices(Reg);5063 FARegNum += (NumUses - UsedByIndices.count() + 1);5064 }5065 size_t FBRegNum = 0;5066 for (const SCEV *Reg : FB.BaseRegs) {5067 const SmallBitVector &UsedByIndices = RegUses.getUsedByIndices(Reg);5068 FBRegNum += (NumUses - UsedByIndices.count() + 1);5069 }5070 if (FARegNum != FBRegNum)5071 return FARegNum < FBRegNum;5072 5073 // If the new register numbers are the same, choose the Formula with5074 // less Cost.5075 Cost CostFA(L, SE, TTI, AMK);5076 Cost CostFB(L, SE, TTI, AMK);5077 Regs.clear();5078 CostFA.RateFormula(FA, Regs, VisitedRegs, LU, HardwareLoopProfitable);5079 Regs.clear();5080 CostFB.RateFormula(FB, Regs, VisitedRegs, LU, HardwareLoopProfitable);5081 return CostFA.isLess(CostFB);5082 };5083 5084 bool Any = false;5085 for (size_t FIdx = 0, NumForms = LU.Formulae.size(); FIdx != NumForms;5086 ++FIdx) {5087 Formula &F = LU.Formulae[FIdx];5088 if (!F.ScaledReg)5089 continue;5090 auto P = BestFormulae.insert({{F.ScaledReg, F.Scale}, FIdx});5091 if (P.second)5092 continue;5093 5094 Formula &Best = LU.Formulae[P.first->second];5095 if (IsBetterThan(F, Best))5096 std::swap(F, Best);5097 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Filtering out formula "; F.print(dbgs());5098 dbgs() << "\n"5099 " in favor of formula ";5100 Best.print(dbgs()); dbgs() << '\n');5101#ifndef NDEBUG5102 ChangedFormulae = true;5103#endif5104 LU.DeleteFormula(F);5105 --FIdx;5106 --NumForms;5107 Any = true;5108 }5109 if (Any)5110 LU.RecomputeRegs(LUIdx, RegUses);5111 5112 // Reset this to prepare for the next use.5113 BestFormulae.clear();5114 }5115 5116 LLVM_DEBUG(if (ChangedFormulae) {5117 dbgs() << "\n"5118 "After filtering out undesirable candidates:\n";5119 print_uses(dbgs());5120 });5121}5122 5123/// If we are over the complexity limit, filter out any post-inc prefering5124/// variables to only post-inc values.5125void LSRInstance::NarrowSearchSpaceByFilterPostInc() {5126 if (AMK != TTI::AMK_PostIndexed)5127 return;5128 if (EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() < ComplexityLimit)5129 return;5130 5131 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "The search space is too complex.\n"5132 "Narrowing the search space by choosing the lowest "5133 "register Formula for PostInc Uses.\n");5134 5135 for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {5136 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];5137 5138 if (LU.Kind != LSRUse::Address)5139 continue;5140 if (!TTI.isIndexedLoadLegal(TTI.MIM_PostInc, LU.AccessTy.getType()) &&5141 !TTI.isIndexedStoreLegal(TTI.MIM_PostInc, LU.AccessTy.getType()))5142 continue;5143 5144 size_t MinRegs = std::numeric_limits<size_t>::max();5145 for (const Formula &F : LU.Formulae)5146 MinRegs = std::min(F.getNumRegs(), MinRegs);5147 5148 bool Any = false;5149 for (size_t FIdx = 0, NumForms = LU.Formulae.size(); FIdx != NumForms;5150 ++FIdx) {5151 Formula &F = LU.Formulae[FIdx];5152 if (F.getNumRegs() > MinRegs) {5153 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Filtering out formula "; F.print(dbgs());5154 dbgs() << "\n");5155 LU.DeleteFormula(F);5156 --FIdx;5157 --NumForms;5158 Any = true;5159 }5160 }5161 if (Any)5162 LU.RecomputeRegs(LUIdx, RegUses);5163 5164 if (EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() < ComplexityLimit)5165 break;5166 }5167 5168 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "After pre-selection:\n"; print_uses(dbgs()));5169}5170 5171/// The function delete formulas with high registers number expectation.5172/// Assuming we don't know the value of each formula (already delete5173/// all inefficient), generate probability of not selecting for each5174/// register.5175/// For example,5176/// Use1:5177/// reg(a) + reg({0,+,1})5178/// reg(a) + reg({-1,+,1}) + 15179/// reg({a,+,1})5180/// Use2:5181/// reg(b) + reg({0,+,1})5182/// reg(b) + reg({-1,+,1}) + 15183/// reg({b,+,1})5184/// Use3:5185/// reg(c) + reg(b) + reg({0,+,1})5186/// reg(c) + reg({b,+,1})5187///5188/// Probability of not selecting5189/// Use1 Use2 Use35190/// reg(a) (1/3) * 1 * 15191/// reg(b) 1 * (1/3) * (1/2)5192/// reg({0,+,1}) (2/3) * (2/3) * (1/2)5193/// reg({-1,+,1}) (2/3) * (2/3) * 15194/// reg({a,+,1}) (2/3) * 1 * 15195/// reg({b,+,1}) 1 * (2/3) * (2/3)5196/// reg(c) 1 * 1 * 05197///5198/// Now count registers number mathematical expectation for each formula:5199/// Note that for each use we exclude probability if not selecting for the use.5200/// For example for Use1 probability for reg(a) would be just 1 * 1 (excluding5201/// probabilty 1/3 of not selecting for Use1).5202/// Use1:5203/// reg(a) + reg({0,+,1}) 1 + 1/3 -- to be deleted5204/// reg(a) + reg({-1,+,1}) + 1 1 + 4/9 -- to be deleted5205/// reg({a,+,1}) 15206/// Use2:5207/// reg(b) + reg({0,+,1}) 1/2 + 1/3 -- to be deleted5208/// reg(b) + reg({-1,+,1}) + 1 1/2 + 2/3 -- to be deleted5209/// reg({b,+,1}) 2/35210/// Use3:5211/// reg(c) + reg(b) + reg({0,+,1}) 1 + 1/3 + 4/9 -- to be deleted5212/// reg(c) + reg({b,+,1}) 1 + 2/35213void LSRInstance::NarrowSearchSpaceByDeletingCostlyFormulas() {5214 if (EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() < ComplexityLimit)5215 return;5216 // Ok, we have too many of formulae on our hands to conveniently handle.5217 // Use a rough heuristic to thin out the list.5218 5219 // Set of Regs wich will be 100% used in final solution.5220 // Used in each formula of a solution (in example above this is reg(c)).5221 // We can skip them in calculations.5222 SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 4> UniqRegs;5223 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "The search space is too complex.\n");5224 5225 // Map each register to probability of not selecting5226 DenseMap <const SCEV *, float> RegNumMap;5227 for (const SCEV *Reg : RegUses) {5228 if (UniqRegs.count(Reg))5229 continue;5230 float PNotSel = 1;5231 for (const LSRUse &LU : Uses) {5232 if (!LU.Regs.count(Reg))5233 continue;5234 float P = LU.getNotSelectedProbability(Reg);5235 if (P != 0.0)5236 PNotSel *= P;5237 else5238 UniqRegs.insert(Reg);5239 }5240 RegNumMap.insert(std::make_pair(Reg, PNotSel));5241 }5242 5243 LLVM_DEBUG(5244 dbgs() << "Narrowing the search space by deleting costly formulas\n");5245 5246 // Delete formulas where registers number expectation is high.5247 for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {5248 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];5249 // If nothing to delete - continue.5250 if (LU.Formulae.size() < 2)5251 continue;5252 // This is temporary solution to test performance. Float should be5253 // replaced with round independent type (based on integers) to avoid5254 // different results for different target builds.5255 float FMinRegNum = LU.Formulae[0].getNumRegs();5256 float FMinARegNum = LU.Formulae[0].getNumRegs();5257 size_t MinIdx = 0;5258 for (size_t i = 0, e = LU.Formulae.size(); i != e; ++i) {5259 Formula &F = LU.Formulae[i];5260 float FRegNum = 0;5261 float FARegNum = 0;5262 for (const SCEV *BaseReg : F.BaseRegs) {5263 if (UniqRegs.count(BaseReg))5264 continue;5265 FRegNum += RegNumMap[BaseReg] / LU.getNotSelectedProbability(BaseReg);5266 if (isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(BaseReg))5267 FARegNum +=5268 RegNumMap[BaseReg] / LU.getNotSelectedProbability(BaseReg);5269 }5270 if (const SCEV *ScaledReg = F.ScaledReg) {5271 if (!UniqRegs.count(ScaledReg)) {5272 FRegNum +=5273 RegNumMap[ScaledReg] / LU.getNotSelectedProbability(ScaledReg);5274 if (isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(ScaledReg))5275 FARegNum +=5276 RegNumMap[ScaledReg] / LU.getNotSelectedProbability(ScaledReg);5277 }5278 }5279 if (FMinRegNum > FRegNum ||5280 (FMinRegNum == FRegNum && FMinARegNum > FARegNum)) {5281 FMinRegNum = FRegNum;5282 FMinARegNum = FARegNum;5283 MinIdx = i;5284 }5285 }5286 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " The formula "; LU.Formulae[MinIdx].print(dbgs());5287 dbgs() << " with min reg num " << FMinRegNum << '\n');5288 if (MinIdx != 0)5289 std::swap(LU.Formulae[MinIdx], LU.Formulae[0]);5290 while (LU.Formulae.size() != 1) {5291 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Deleting "; LU.Formulae.back().print(dbgs());5292 dbgs() << '\n');5293 LU.Formulae.pop_back();5294 }5295 LU.RecomputeRegs(LUIdx, RegUses);5296 assert(LU.Formulae.size() == 1 && "Should be exactly 1 min regs formula");5297 Formula &F = LU.Formulae[0];5298 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Leaving only "; F.print(dbgs()); dbgs() << '\n');5299 // When we choose the formula, the regs become unique.5300 UniqRegs.insert_range(F.BaseRegs);5301 if (F.ScaledReg)5302 UniqRegs.insert(F.ScaledReg);5303 }5304 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "After pre-selection:\n"; print_uses(dbgs()));5305}5306 5307// Check if Best and Reg are SCEVs separated by a constant amount C, and if so5308// would the addressing offset +C would be legal where the negative offset -C is5309// not.5310static bool IsSimplerBaseSCEVForTarget(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,5311 ScalarEvolution &SE, const SCEV *Best,5312 const SCEV *Reg,5313 MemAccessTy AccessType) {5314 if (Best->getType() != Reg->getType() ||5315 (isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Best) && isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Reg) &&5316 cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Best)->getLoop() !=5317 cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Reg)->getLoop()))5318 return false;5319 std::optional<APInt> Diff = SE.computeConstantDifference(Best, Reg);5320 if (!Diff)5321 return false;5322 5323 return TTI.isLegalAddressingMode(5324 AccessType.MemTy, /*BaseGV=*/nullptr,5325 /*BaseOffset=*/Diff->getSExtValue(),5326 /*HasBaseReg=*/true, /*Scale=*/0, AccessType.AddrSpace) &&5327 !TTI.isLegalAddressingMode(5328 AccessType.MemTy, /*BaseGV=*/nullptr,5329 /*BaseOffset=*/-Diff->getSExtValue(),5330 /*HasBaseReg=*/true, /*Scale=*/0, AccessType.AddrSpace);5331}5332 5333/// Pick a register which seems likely to be profitable, and then in any use5334/// which has any reference to that register, delete all formulae which do not5335/// reference that register.5336void LSRInstance::NarrowSearchSpaceByPickingWinnerRegs() {5337 // With all other options exhausted, loop until the system is simple5338 // enough to handle.5339 SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 4> Taken;5340 while (EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() >= ComplexityLimit) {5341 // Ok, we have too many of formulae on our hands to conveniently handle.5342 // Use a rough heuristic to thin out the list.5343 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "The search space is too complex.\n");5344 5345 // Pick the register which is used by the most LSRUses, which is likely5346 // to be a good reuse register candidate.5347 const SCEV *Best = nullptr;5348 unsigned BestNum = 0;5349 for (const SCEV *Reg : RegUses) {5350 if (Taken.count(Reg))5351 continue;5352 if (!Best) {5353 Best = Reg;5354 BestNum = RegUses.getUsedByIndices(Reg).count();5355 } else {5356 unsigned Count = RegUses.getUsedByIndices(Reg).count();5357 if (Count > BestNum) {5358 Best = Reg;5359 BestNum = Count;5360 }5361 5362 // If the scores are the same, but the Reg is simpler for the target5363 // (for example {x,+,1} as opposed to {x+C,+,1}, where the target can5364 // handle +C but not -C), opt for the simpler formula.5365 if (Count == BestNum) {5366 int LUIdx = RegUses.getUsedByIndices(Reg).find_first();5367 if (LUIdx >= 0 && Uses[LUIdx].Kind == LSRUse::Address &&5368 IsSimplerBaseSCEVForTarget(TTI, SE, Best, Reg,5369 Uses[LUIdx].AccessTy)) {5370 Best = Reg;5371 BestNum = Count;5372 }5373 }5374 }5375 }5376 assert(Best && "Failed to find best LSRUse candidate");5377 5378 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Narrowing the search space by assuming " << *Best5379 << " will yield profitable reuse.\n");5380 Taken.insert(Best);5381 5382 // In any use with formulae which references this register, delete formulae5383 // which don't reference it.5384 for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {5385 LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];5386 if (!LU.Regs.count(Best)) continue;5387 5388 bool Any = false;5389 for (size_t i = 0, e = LU.Formulae.size(); i != e; ++i) {5390 Formula &F = LU.Formulae[i];5391 if (!F.referencesReg(Best)) {5392 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Deleting "; F.print(dbgs()); dbgs() << '\n');5393 LU.DeleteFormula(F);5394 --e;5395 --i;5396 Any = true;5397 assert(e != 0 && "Use has no formulae left! Is Regs inconsistent?");5398 continue;5399 }5400 }5401 5402 if (Any)5403 LU.RecomputeRegs(LUIdx, RegUses);5404 }5405 5406 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "After pre-selection:\n"; print_uses(dbgs()));5407 }5408}5409 5410/// If there are an extraordinary number of formulae to choose from, use some5411/// rough heuristics to prune down the number of formulae. This keeps the main5412/// solver from taking an extraordinary amount of time in some worst-case5413/// scenarios.5414void LSRInstance::NarrowSearchSpaceUsingHeuristics() {5415 NarrowSearchSpaceByDetectingSupersets();5416 NarrowSearchSpaceByCollapsingUnrolledCode();5417 NarrowSearchSpaceByRefilteringUndesirableDedicatedRegisters();5418 if (FilterSameScaledReg)5419 NarrowSearchSpaceByFilterFormulaWithSameScaledReg();5420 NarrowSearchSpaceByFilterPostInc();5421 if (LSRExpNarrow)5422 NarrowSearchSpaceByDeletingCostlyFormulas();5423 else5424 NarrowSearchSpaceByPickingWinnerRegs();5425}5426 5427/// This is the recursive solver.5428void LSRInstance::SolveRecurse(SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Solution,5429 Cost &SolutionCost,5430 SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Workspace,5431 const Cost &CurCost,5432 const SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 16> &CurRegs,5433 DenseSet<const SCEV *> &VisitedRegs) const {5434 // Some ideas:5435 // - prune more:5436 // - use more aggressive filtering5437 // - sort the formula so that the most profitable solutions are found first5438 // - sort the uses too5439 // - search faster:5440 // - don't compute a cost, and then compare. compare while computing a cost5441 // and bail early.5442 // - track register sets with SmallBitVector5443 5444 const LSRUse &LU = Uses[Workspace.size()];5445 5446 // If this use references any register that's already a part of the5447 // in-progress solution, consider it a requirement that a formula must5448 // reference that register in order to be considered. This prunes out5449 // unprofitable searching.5450 SmallSetVector<const SCEV *, 4> ReqRegs;5451 for (const SCEV *S : CurRegs)5452 if (LU.Regs.count(S))5453 ReqRegs.insert(S);5454 5455 SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 16> NewRegs;5456 Cost NewCost(L, SE, TTI, AMK);5457 for (const Formula &F : LU.Formulae) {5458 // Ignore formulae which may not be ideal in terms of register reuse of5459 // ReqRegs. The formula should use all required registers before5460 // introducing new ones.5461 // This can sometimes (notably when trying to favour postinc) lead to5462 // sub-optimial decisions. There it is best left to the cost modelling to5463 // get correct.5464 if (!(AMK & TTI::AMK_PostIndexed) || LU.Kind != LSRUse::Address) {5465 int NumReqRegsToFind = std::min(F.getNumRegs(), ReqRegs.size());5466 for (const SCEV *Reg : ReqRegs) {5467 if ((F.ScaledReg && F.ScaledReg == Reg) ||5468 is_contained(F.BaseRegs, Reg)) {5469 --NumReqRegsToFind;5470 if (NumReqRegsToFind == 0)5471 break;5472 }5473 }5474 if (NumReqRegsToFind != 0) {5475 // If none of the formulae satisfied the required registers, then we could5476 // clear ReqRegs and try again. Currently, we simply give up in this case.5477 continue;5478 }5479 }5480 5481 // Evaluate the cost of the current formula. If it's already worse than5482 // the current best, prune the search at that point.5483 NewCost = CurCost;5484 NewRegs = CurRegs;5485 NewCost.RateFormula(F, NewRegs, VisitedRegs, LU, HardwareLoopProfitable);5486 if (NewCost.isLess(SolutionCost)) {5487 Workspace.push_back(&F);5488 if (Workspace.size() != Uses.size()) {5489 SolveRecurse(Solution, SolutionCost, Workspace, NewCost,5490 NewRegs, VisitedRegs);5491 if (F.getNumRegs() == 1 && Workspace.size() == 1)5492 VisitedRegs.insert(F.ScaledReg ? F.ScaledReg : F.BaseRegs[0]);5493 } else {5494 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "New best at "; NewCost.print(dbgs());5495 dbgs() << ".\nRegs:\n";5496 for (const SCEV *S : NewRegs) dbgs()5497 << "- " << *S << "\n";5498 dbgs() << '\n');5499 5500 SolutionCost = NewCost;5501 Solution = Workspace;5502 }5503 Workspace.pop_back();5504 }5505 }5506}5507 5508/// Choose one formula from each use. Return the results in the given Solution5509/// vector.5510void LSRInstance::Solve(SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Solution) const {5511 SmallVector<const Formula *, 8> Workspace;5512 Cost SolutionCost(L, SE, TTI, AMK);5513 SolutionCost.Lose();5514 Cost CurCost(L, SE, TTI, AMK);5515 SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 16> CurRegs;5516 DenseSet<const SCEV *> VisitedRegs;5517 Workspace.reserve(Uses.size());5518 5519 // SolveRecurse does all the work.5520 SolveRecurse(Solution, SolutionCost, Workspace, CurCost,5521 CurRegs, VisitedRegs);5522 if (Solution.empty()) {5523 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\nNo Satisfactory Solution\n");5524 return;5525 }5526 5527 // Ok, we've now made all our decisions.5528 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\n"5529 "The chosen solution requires ";5530 SolutionCost.print(dbgs()); dbgs() << ":\n";5531 for (size_t i = 0, e = Uses.size(); i != e; ++i) {5532 dbgs() << " ";5533 Uses[i].print(dbgs());5534 dbgs() << "\n"5535 " ";5536 Solution[i]->print(dbgs());5537 dbgs() << '\n';5538 });5539 5540 assert(Solution.size() == Uses.size() && "Malformed solution!");5541 5542 const bool EnableDropUnprofitableSolution = [&] {5543 switch (AllowDropSolutionIfLessProfitable) {5544 case cl::BOU_TRUE:5545 return true;5546 case cl::BOU_FALSE:5547 return false;5548 case cl::BOU_UNSET:5549 return TTI.shouldDropLSRSolutionIfLessProfitable();5550 }5551 llvm_unreachable("Unhandled cl::boolOrDefault enum");5552 }();5553 5554 if (BaselineCost.isLess(SolutionCost)) {5555 if (!EnableDropUnprofitableSolution)5556 LLVM_DEBUG(5557 dbgs() << "Baseline is more profitable than chosen solution, "5558 "add option 'lsr-drop-solution' to drop LSR solution.\n");5559 else {5560 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Baseline is more profitable than chosen "5561 "solution, dropping LSR solution.\n";);5562 Solution.clear();5563 }5564 }5565}5566 5567/// Helper for AdjustInsertPositionForExpand. Climb up the dominator tree far as5568/// we can go while still being dominated by the input positions. This helps5569/// canonicalize the insert position, which encourages sharing.5570BasicBlock::iterator5571LSRInstance::HoistInsertPosition(BasicBlock::iterator IP,5572 const SmallVectorImpl<Instruction *> &Inputs)5573 const {5574 Instruction *Tentative = &*IP;5575 while (true) {5576 bool AllDominate = true;5577 Instruction *BetterPos = nullptr;5578 // Don't bother attempting to insert before a catchswitch, their basic block5579 // cannot have other non-PHI instructions.5580 if (isa<CatchSwitchInst>(Tentative))5581 return IP;5582 5583 for (Instruction *Inst : Inputs) {5584 if (Inst == Tentative || !DT.dominates(Inst, Tentative)) {5585 AllDominate = false;5586 break;5587 }5588 // Attempt to find an insert position in the middle of the block,5589 // instead of at the end, so that it can be used for other expansions.5590 if (Tentative->getParent() == Inst->getParent() &&5591 (!BetterPos || !DT.dominates(Inst, BetterPos)))5592 BetterPos = &*std::next(BasicBlock::iterator(Inst));5593 }5594 if (!AllDominate)5595 break;5596 if (BetterPos)5597 IP = BetterPos->getIterator();5598 else5599 IP = Tentative->getIterator();5600 5601 const Loop *IPLoop = LI.getLoopFor(IP->getParent());5602 unsigned IPLoopDepth = IPLoop ? IPLoop->getLoopDepth() : 0;5603 5604 BasicBlock *IDom;5605 for (DomTreeNode *Rung = DT.getNode(IP->getParent()); ; ) {5606 if (!Rung) return IP;5607 Rung = Rung->getIDom();5608 if (!Rung) return IP;5609 IDom = Rung->getBlock();5610 5611 // Don't climb into a loop though.5612 const Loop *IDomLoop = LI.getLoopFor(IDom);5613 unsigned IDomDepth = IDomLoop ? IDomLoop->getLoopDepth() : 0;5614 if (IDomDepth <= IPLoopDepth &&5615 (IDomDepth != IPLoopDepth || IDomLoop == IPLoop))5616 break;5617 }5618 5619 Tentative = IDom->getTerminator();5620 }5621 5622 return IP;5623}5624 5625/// Determine an input position which will be dominated by the operands and5626/// which will dominate the result.5627BasicBlock::iterator LSRInstance::AdjustInsertPositionForExpand(5628 BasicBlock::iterator LowestIP, const LSRFixup &LF, const LSRUse &LU) const {5629 // Collect some instructions which must be dominated by the5630 // expanding replacement. These must be dominated by any operands that5631 // will be required in the expansion.5632 SmallVector<Instruction *, 4> Inputs;5633 if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(LF.OperandValToReplace))5634 Inputs.push_back(I);5635 if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero)5636 if (Instruction *I =5637 dyn_cast<Instruction>(cast<ICmpInst>(LF.UserInst)->getOperand(1)))5638 Inputs.push_back(I);5639 if (LF.PostIncLoops.count(L)) {5640 if (LF.isUseFullyOutsideLoop(L))5641 Inputs.push_back(L->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator());5642 else5643 Inputs.push_back(IVIncInsertPos);5644 }5645 // The expansion must also be dominated by the increment positions of any5646 // loops it for which it is using post-inc mode.5647 for (const Loop *PIL : LF.PostIncLoops) {5648 if (PIL == L) continue;5649 5650 // Be dominated by the loop exit.5651 SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4> ExitingBlocks;5652 PIL->getExitingBlocks(ExitingBlocks);5653 if (!ExitingBlocks.empty()) {5654 BasicBlock *BB = ExitingBlocks[0];5655 for (unsigned i = 1, e = ExitingBlocks.size(); i != e; ++i)5656 BB = DT.findNearestCommonDominator(BB, ExitingBlocks[i]);5657 Inputs.push_back(BB->getTerminator());5658 }5659 }5660 5661 assert(!isa<PHINode>(LowestIP) && !LowestIP->isEHPad() &&5662 "Insertion point must be a normal instruction");5663 5664 // Then, climb up the immediate dominator tree as far as we can go while5665 // still being dominated by the input positions.5666 BasicBlock::iterator IP = HoistInsertPosition(LowestIP, Inputs);5667 5668 // Don't insert instructions before PHI nodes.5669 while (isa<PHINode>(IP)) ++IP;5670 5671 // Ignore landingpad instructions.5672 while (IP->isEHPad()) ++IP;5673 5674 // Set IP below instructions recently inserted by SCEVExpander. This keeps the5675 // IP consistent across expansions and allows the previously inserted5676 // instructions to be reused by subsequent expansion.5677 while (Rewriter.isInsertedInstruction(&*IP) && IP != LowestIP)5678 ++IP;5679 5680 return IP;5681}5682 5683/// Emit instructions for the leading candidate expression for this LSRUse (this5684/// is called "expanding").5685Value *LSRInstance::Expand(const LSRUse &LU, const LSRFixup &LF,5686 const Formula &F, BasicBlock::iterator IP,5687 SmallVectorImpl<WeakTrackingVH> &DeadInsts) const {5688 if (LU.RigidFormula)5689 return LF.OperandValToReplace;5690 5691 // Determine an input position which will be dominated by the operands and5692 // which will dominate the result.5693 IP = AdjustInsertPositionForExpand(IP, LF, LU);5694 Rewriter.setInsertPoint(&*IP);5695 5696 // Inform the Rewriter if we have a post-increment use, so that it can5697 // perform an advantageous expansion.5698 Rewriter.setPostInc(LF.PostIncLoops);5699 5700 // This is the type that the user actually needs.5701 Type *OpTy = LF.OperandValToReplace->getType();5702 // This will be the type that we'll initially expand to.5703 Type *Ty = F.getType();5704 if (!Ty)5705 // No type known; just expand directly to the ultimate type.5706 Ty = OpTy;5707 else if (SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(Ty) == SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(OpTy))5708 // Expand directly to the ultimate type if it's the right size.5709 Ty = OpTy;5710 // This is the type to do integer arithmetic in.5711 Type *IntTy = SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(Ty);5712 5713 // Build up a list of operands to add together to form the full base.5714 SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> Ops;5715 5716 // Expand the BaseRegs portion.5717 for (const SCEV *Reg : F.BaseRegs) {5718 assert(!Reg->isZero() && "Zero allocated in a base register!");5719 5720 // If we're expanding for a post-inc user, make the post-inc adjustment.5721 Reg = denormalizeForPostIncUse(Reg, LF.PostIncLoops, SE);5722 Ops.push_back(SE.getUnknown(Rewriter.expandCodeFor(Reg, nullptr)));5723 }5724 5725 // Expand the ScaledReg portion.5726 Value *ICmpScaledV = nullptr;5727 if (F.Scale != 0) {5728 const SCEV *ScaledS = F.ScaledReg;5729 5730 // If we're expanding for a post-inc user, make the post-inc adjustment.5731 PostIncLoopSet &Loops = const_cast<PostIncLoopSet &>(LF.PostIncLoops);5732 ScaledS = denormalizeForPostIncUse(ScaledS, Loops, SE);5733 5734 if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero) {5735 // Expand ScaleReg as if it was part of the base regs.5736 if (F.Scale == 1)5737 Ops.push_back(5738 SE.getUnknown(Rewriter.expandCodeFor(ScaledS, nullptr)));5739 else {5740 // An interesting way of "folding" with an icmp is to use a negated5741 // scale, which we'll implement by inserting it into the other operand5742 // of the icmp.5743 assert(F.Scale == -1 &&5744 "The only scale supported by ICmpZero uses is -1!");5745 ICmpScaledV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(ScaledS, nullptr);5746 }5747 } else {5748 // Otherwise just expand the scaled register and an explicit scale,5749 // which is expected to be matched as part of the address.5750 5751 // Flush the operand list to suppress SCEVExpander hoisting address modes.5752 // Unless the addressing mode will not be folded.5753 if (!Ops.empty() && LU.Kind == LSRUse::Address &&5754 isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, LU, F)) {5755 Value *FullV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(SE.getAddExpr(Ops), nullptr);5756 Ops.clear();5757 Ops.push_back(SE.getUnknown(FullV));5758 }5759 ScaledS = SE.getUnknown(Rewriter.expandCodeFor(ScaledS, nullptr));5760 if (F.Scale != 1)5761 ScaledS =5762 SE.getMulExpr(ScaledS, SE.getConstant(ScaledS->getType(), F.Scale));5763 Ops.push_back(ScaledS);5764 }5765 }5766 5767 // Expand the GV portion.5768 if (F.BaseGV) {5769 // Flush the operand list to suppress SCEVExpander hoisting.5770 if (!Ops.empty()) {5771 Value *FullV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(SE.getAddExpr(Ops), IntTy);5772 Ops.clear();5773 Ops.push_back(SE.getUnknown(FullV));5774 }5775 Ops.push_back(SE.getUnknown(F.BaseGV));5776 }5777 5778 // Flush the operand list to suppress SCEVExpander hoisting of both folded and5779 // unfolded offsets. LSR assumes they both live next to their uses.5780 if (!Ops.empty()) {5781 Value *FullV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(SE.getAddExpr(Ops), Ty);5782 Ops.clear();5783 Ops.push_back(SE.getUnknown(FullV));5784 }5785 5786 // FIXME: Are we sure we won't get a mismatch here? Is there a way to bail5787 // out at this point, or should we generate a SCEV adding together mixed5788 // offsets?5789 assert(F.BaseOffset.isCompatibleImmediate(LF.Offset) &&5790 "Expanding mismatched offsets\n");5791 // Expand the immediate portion.5792 Immediate Offset = F.BaseOffset.addUnsigned(LF.Offset);5793 if (Offset.isNonZero()) {5794 if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero) {5795 // The other interesting way of "folding" with an ICmpZero is to use a5796 // negated immediate.5797 if (!ICmpScaledV)5798 ICmpScaledV =5799 ConstantInt::get(IntTy, -(uint64_t)Offset.getFixedValue());5800 else {5801 Ops.push_back(SE.getUnknown(ICmpScaledV));5802 ICmpScaledV = ConstantInt::get(IntTy, Offset.getFixedValue());5803 }5804 } else {5805 // Just add the immediate values. These again are expected to be matched5806 // as part of the address.5807 Ops.push_back(Offset.getUnknownSCEV(SE, IntTy));5808 }5809 }5810 5811 // Expand the unfolded offset portion.5812 Immediate UnfoldedOffset = F.UnfoldedOffset;5813 if (UnfoldedOffset.isNonZero()) {5814 // Just add the immediate values.5815 Ops.push_back(UnfoldedOffset.getUnknownSCEV(SE, IntTy));5816 }5817 5818 // Emit instructions summing all the operands.5819 const SCEV *FullS = Ops.empty() ?5820 SE.getConstant(IntTy, 0) :5821 SE.getAddExpr(Ops);5822 Value *FullV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(FullS, Ty);5823 5824 // We're done expanding now, so reset the rewriter.5825 Rewriter.clearPostInc();5826 5827 // An ICmpZero Formula represents an ICmp which we're handling as a5828 // comparison against zero. Now that we've expanded an expression for that5829 // form, update the ICmp's other operand.5830 if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero) {5831 ICmpInst *CI = cast<ICmpInst>(LF.UserInst);5832 if (auto *OperandIsInstr = dyn_cast<Instruction>(CI->getOperand(1)))5833 DeadInsts.emplace_back(OperandIsInstr);5834 assert(!F.BaseGV && "ICmp does not support folding a global value and "5835 "a scale at the same time!");5836 if (F.Scale == -1) {5837 if (ICmpScaledV->getType() != OpTy) {5838 Instruction *Cast = CastInst::Create(5839 CastInst::getCastOpcode(ICmpScaledV, false, OpTy, false),5840 ICmpScaledV, OpTy, "tmp", CI->getIterator());5841 ICmpScaledV = Cast;5842 }5843 CI->setOperand(1, ICmpScaledV);5844 } else {5845 // A scale of 1 means that the scale has been expanded as part of the5846 // base regs.5847 assert((F.Scale == 0 || F.Scale == 1) &&5848 "ICmp does not support folding a global value and "5849 "a scale at the same time!");5850 Constant *C = ConstantInt::getSigned(SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(OpTy),5851 -(uint64_t)Offset.getFixedValue());5852 if (C->getType() != OpTy) {5853 C = ConstantFoldCastOperand(5854 CastInst::getCastOpcode(C, false, OpTy, false), C, OpTy,5855 CI->getDataLayout());5856 assert(C && "Cast of ConstantInt should have folded");5857 }5858 5859 CI->setOperand(1, C);5860 }5861 }5862 5863 return FullV;5864}5865 5866/// Helper for Rewrite. PHI nodes are special because the use of their operands5867/// effectively happens in their predecessor blocks, so the expression may need5868/// to be expanded in multiple places.5869void LSRInstance::RewriteForPHI(PHINode *PN, const LSRUse &LU,5870 const LSRFixup &LF, const Formula &F,5871 SmallVectorImpl<WeakTrackingVH> &DeadInsts) {5872 DenseMap<BasicBlock *, Value *> Inserted;5873 5874 for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)5875 if (PN->getIncomingValue(i) == LF.OperandValToReplace) {5876 bool needUpdateFixups = false;5877 BasicBlock *BB = PN->getIncomingBlock(i);5878 5879 // If this is a critical edge, split the edge so that we do not insert5880 // the code on all predecessor/successor paths. We do this unless this5881 // is the canonical backedge for this loop, which complicates post-inc5882 // users.5883 if (e != 1 && BB->getTerminator()->getNumSuccessors() > 1 &&5884 !isa<IndirectBrInst>(BB->getTerminator()) &&5885 !isa<CatchSwitchInst>(BB->getTerminator())) {5886 BasicBlock *Parent = PN->getParent();5887 Loop *PNLoop = LI.getLoopFor(Parent);5888 if (!PNLoop || Parent != PNLoop->getHeader()) {5889 // Split the critical edge.5890 BasicBlock *NewBB = nullptr;5891 if (!Parent->isLandingPad()) {5892 NewBB =5893 SplitCriticalEdge(BB, Parent,5894 CriticalEdgeSplittingOptions(&DT, &LI, MSSAU)5895 .setMergeIdenticalEdges()5896 .setKeepOneInputPHIs());5897 } else {5898 SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 2> NewBBs;5899 DomTreeUpdater DTU(DT, DomTreeUpdater::UpdateStrategy::Eager);5900 SplitLandingPadPredecessors(Parent, BB, "", "", NewBBs, &DTU, &LI);5901 NewBB = NewBBs[0];5902 }5903 // If NewBB==NULL, then SplitCriticalEdge refused to split because all5904 // phi predecessors are identical. The simple thing to do is skip5905 // splitting in this case rather than complicate the API.5906 if (NewBB) {5907 // If PN is outside of the loop and BB is in the loop, we want to5908 // move the block to be immediately before the PHI block, not5909 // immediately after BB.5910 if (L->contains(BB) && !L->contains(PN))5911 NewBB->moveBefore(PN->getParent());5912 5913 // Splitting the edge can reduce the number of PHI entries we have.5914 e = PN->getNumIncomingValues();5915 BB = NewBB;5916 i = PN->getBasicBlockIndex(BB);5917 5918 needUpdateFixups = true;5919 }5920 }5921 }5922 5923 std::pair<DenseMap<BasicBlock *, Value *>::iterator, bool> Pair =5924 Inserted.try_emplace(BB);5925 if (!Pair.second)5926 PN->setIncomingValue(i, Pair.first->second);5927 else {5928 Value *FullV =5929 Expand(LU, LF, F, BB->getTerminator()->getIterator(), DeadInsts);5930 5931 // If this is reuse-by-noop-cast, insert the noop cast.5932 Type *OpTy = LF.OperandValToReplace->getType();5933 if (FullV->getType() != OpTy)5934 FullV = CastInst::Create(5935 CastInst::getCastOpcode(FullV, false, OpTy, false), FullV,5936 LF.OperandValToReplace->getType(), "tmp",5937 BB->getTerminator()->getIterator());5938 5939 // If the incoming block for this value is not in the loop, it means the5940 // current PHI is not in a loop exit, so we must create a LCSSA PHI for5941 // the inserted value.5942 if (auto *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(FullV))5943 if (L->contains(I) && !L->contains(BB))5944 InsertedNonLCSSAInsts.insert(I);5945 5946 PN->setIncomingValue(i, FullV);5947 Pair.first->second = FullV;5948 }5949 5950 // If LSR splits critical edge and phi node has other pending5951 // fixup operands, we need to update those pending fixups. Otherwise5952 // formulae will not be implemented completely and some instructions5953 // will not be eliminated.5954 if (needUpdateFixups) {5955 for (LSRUse &LU : Uses)5956 for (LSRFixup &Fixup : LU.Fixups)5957 // If fixup is supposed to rewrite some operand in the phi5958 // that was just updated, it may be already moved to5959 // another phi node. Such fixup requires update.5960 if (Fixup.UserInst == PN) {5961 // Check if the operand we try to replace still exists in the5962 // original phi.5963 bool foundInOriginalPHI = false;5964 for (const auto &val : PN->incoming_values())5965 if (val == Fixup.OperandValToReplace) {5966 foundInOriginalPHI = true;5967 break;5968 }5969 5970 // If fixup operand found in original PHI - nothing to do.5971 if (foundInOriginalPHI)5972 continue;5973 5974 // Otherwise it might be moved to another PHI and requires update.5975 // If fixup operand not found in any of the incoming blocks that5976 // means we have already rewritten it - nothing to do.5977 for (const auto &Block : PN->blocks())5978 for (BasicBlock::iterator I = Block->begin(); isa<PHINode>(I);5979 ++I) {5980 PHINode *NewPN = cast<PHINode>(I);5981 for (const auto &val : NewPN->incoming_values())5982 if (val == Fixup.OperandValToReplace)5983 Fixup.UserInst = NewPN;5984 }5985 }5986 }5987 }5988}5989 5990/// Emit instructions for the leading candidate expression for this LSRUse (this5991/// is called "expanding"), and update the UserInst to reference the newly5992/// expanded value.5993void LSRInstance::Rewrite(const LSRUse &LU, const LSRFixup &LF,5994 const Formula &F,5995 SmallVectorImpl<WeakTrackingVH> &DeadInsts) {5996 // First, find an insertion point that dominates UserInst. For PHI nodes,5997 // find the nearest block which dominates all the relevant uses.5998 if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(LF.UserInst)) {5999 RewriteForPHI(PN, LU, LF, F, DeadInsts);6000 } else {6001 Value *FullV = Expand(LU, LF, F, LF.UserInst->getIterator(), DeadInsts);6002 6003 // If this is reuse-by-noop-cast, insert the noop cast.6004 Type *OpTy = LF.OperandValToReplace->getType();6005 if (FullV->getType() != OpTy) {6006 Instruction *Cast =6007 CastInst::Create(CastInst::getCastOpcode(FullV, false, OpTy, false),6008 FullV, OpTy, "tmp", LF.UserInst->getIterator());6009 FullV = Cast;6010 }6011 6012 // Update the user. ICmpZero is handled specially here (for now) because6013 // Expand may have updated one of the operands of the icmp already, and6014 // its new value may happen to be equal to LF.OperandValToReplace, in6015 // which case doing replaceUsesOfWith leads to replacing both operands6016 // with the same value. TODO: Reorganize this.6017 if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero)6018 LF.UserInst->setOperand(0, FullV);6019 else6020 LF.UserInst->replaceUsesOfWith(LF.OperandValToReplace, FullV);6021 }6022 6023 if (auto *OperandIsInstr = dyn_cast<Instruction>(LF.OperandValToReplace))6024 DeadInsts.emplace_back(OperandIsInstr);6025}6026 6027// Trying to hoist the IVInc to loop header if all IVInc users are in6028// the loop header. It will help backend to generate post index load/store6029// when the latch block is different from loop header block.6030static bool canHoistIVInc(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, const LSRFixup &Fixup,6031 const LSRUse &LU, Instruction *IVIncInsertPos,6032 Loop *L) {6033 if (LU.Kind != LSRUse::Address)6034 return false;6035 6036 // For now this code do the conservative optimization, only work for6037 // the header block. Later we can hoist the IVInc to the block post6038 // dominate all users.6039 BasicBlock *LHeader = L->getHeader();6040 if (IVIncInsertPos->getParent() == LHeader)6041 return false;6042 6043 if (!Fixup.OperandValToReplace ||6044 any_of(Fixup.OperandValToReplace->users(), [&LHeader](User *U) {6045 Instruction *UI = cast<Instruction>(U);6046 return UI->getParent() != LHeader;6047 }))6048 return false;6049 6050 Instruction *I = Fixup.UserInst;6051 Type *Ty = I->getType();6052 return (isa<LoadInst>(I) && TTI.isIndexedLoadLegal(TTI.MIM_PostInc, Ty)) ||6053 (isa<StoreInst>(I) && TTI.isIndexedStoreLegal(TTI.MIM_PostInc, Ty));6054}6055 6056/// Rewrite all the fixup locations with new values, following the chosen6057/// solution.6058void LSRInstance::ImplementSolution(6059 const SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Solution) {6060 // Keep track of instructions we may have made dead, so that6061 // we can remove them after we are done working.6062 SmallVector<WeakTrackingVH, 16> DeadInsts;6063 6064 // Mark phi nodes that terminate chains so the expander tries to reuse them.6065 for (const IVChain &Chain : IVChainVec) {6066 if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(Chain.tailUserInst()))6067 Rewriter.setChainedPhi(PN);6068 }6069 6070 // Expand the new value definitions and update the users.6071 for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx)6072 for (const LSRFixup &Fixup : Uses[LUIdx].Fixups) {6073 Instruction *InsertPos =6074 canHoistIVInc(TTI, Fixup, Uses[LUIdx], IVIncInsertPos, L)6075 ? L->getHeader()->getTerminator()6076 : IVIncInsertPos;6077 Rewriter.setIVIncInsertPos(L, InsertPos);6078 Rewrite(Uses[LUIdx], Fixup, *Solution[LUIdx], DeadInsts);6079 Changed = true;6080 }6081 6082 auto InsertedInsts = InsertedNonLCSSAInsts.takeVector();6083 formLCSSAForInstructions(InsertedInsts, DT, LI, &SE);6084 6085 for (const IVChain &Chain : IVChainVec) {6086 GenerateIVChain(Chain, DeadInsts);6087 Changed = true;6088 }6089 6090 for (const WeakVH &IV : Rewriter.getInsertedIVs())6091 if (IV && dyn_cast<Instruction>(&*IV)->getParent())6092 ScalarEvolutionIVs.push_back(IV);6093 6094 // Clean up after ourselves. This must be done before deleting any6095 // instructions.6096 Rewriter.clear();6097 6098 Changed |= RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructionsPermissive(DeadInsts,6099 &TLI, MSSAU);6100 6101 // In our cost analysis above, we assume that each addrec consumes exactly6102 // one register, and arrange to have increments inserted just before the6103 // latch to maximimize the chance this is true. However, if we reused6104 // existing IVs, we now need to move the increments to match our6105 // expectations. Otherwise, our cost modeling results in us having a6106 // chosen a non-optimal result for the actual schedule. (And yes, this6107 // scheduling decision does impact later codegen.)6108 for (PHINode &PN : L->getHeader()->phis()) {6109 BinaryOperator *BO = nullptr;6110 Value *Start = nullptr, *Step = nullptr;6111 if (!matchSimpleRecurrence(&PN, BO, Start, Step))6112 continue;6113 6114 switch (BO->getOpcode()) {6115 case Instruction::Sub:6116 if (BO->getOperand(0) != &PN)6117 // sub is non-commutative - match handling elsewhere in LSR6118 continue;6119 break;6120 case Instruction::Add:6121 break;6122 default:6123 continue;6124 };6125 6126 if (!isa<Constant>(Step))6127 // If not a constant step, might increase register pressure6128 // (We assume constants have been canonicalized to RHS)6129 continue;6130 6131 if (BO->getParent() == IVIncInsertPos->getParent())6132 // Only bother moving across blocks. Isel can handle block local case.6133 continue;6134 6135 // Can we legally schedule inc at the desired point?6136 if (!llvm::all_of(BO->uses(),6137 [&](Use &U) {return DT.dominates(IVIncInsertPos, U);}))6138 continue;6139 BO->moveBefore(IVIncInsertPos->getIterator());6140 Changed = true;6141 }6142 6143 6144}6145 6146LSRInstance::LSRInstance(Loop *L, IVUsers &IU, ScalarEvolution &SE,6147 DominatorTree &DT, LoopInfo &LI,6148 const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, AssumptionCache &AC,6149 TargetLibraryInfo &TLI, MemorySSAUpdater *MSSAU)6150 : IU(IU), SE(SE), DT(DT), LI(LI), AC(AC), TLI(TLI), TTI(TTI), L(L),6151 MSSAU(MSSAU), AMK(PreferredAddresingMode.getNumOccurrences() > 06152 ? PreferredAddresingMode6153 : TTI.getPreferredAddressingMode(L, &SE)),6154 Rewriter(SE, L->getHeader()->getDataLayout(), "lsr", false),6155 BaselineCost(L, SE, TTI, AMK) {6156 // If LoopSimplify form is not available, stay out of trouble.6157 if (!L->isLoopSimplifyForm())6158 return;6159 6160 // If there's no interesting work to be done, bail early.6161 if (IU.empty()) return;6162 6163 // If there's too much analysis to be done, bail early. We won't be able to6164 // model the problem anyway.6165 unsigned NumUsers = 0;6166 for (const IVStrideUse &U : IU) {6167 if (++NumUsers > MaxIVUsers) {6168 (void)U;6169 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LSR skipping loop, too many IV Users in " << U6170 << "\n");6171 return;6172 }6173 // Bail out if we have a PHI on an EHPad that gets a value from a6174 // CatchSwitchInst. Because the CatchSwitchInst cannot be split, there is6175 // no good place to stick any instructions.6176 if (auto *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(U.getUser())) {6177 auto FirstNonPHI = PN->getParent()->getFirstNonPHIIt();6178 if (isa<FuncletPadInst>(FirstNonPHI) ||6179 isa<CatchSwitchInst>(FirstNonPHI))6180 for (BasicBlock *PredBB : PN->blocks())6181 if (isa<CatchSwitchInst>(PredBB->getFirstNonPHIIt()))6182 return;6183 }6184 }6185 6186 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\nLSR on loop ";6187 L->getHeader()->printAsOperand(dbgs(), /*PrintType=*/false);6188 dbgs() << ":\n");6189 6190 // Check if we expect this loop to use a hardware loop instruction, which will6191 // be used when calculating the costs of formulas.6192 HardwareLoopInfo HWLoopInfo(L);6193 HardwareLoopProfitable =6194 TTI.isHardwareLoopProfitable(L, SE, AC, &TLI, HWLoopInfo);6195 6196 // Configure SCEVExpander already now, so the correct mode is used for6197 // isSafeToExpand() checks.6198#if LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS6199 Rewriter.setDebugType(DEBUG_TYPE);6200#endif6201 Rewriter.disableCanonicalMode();6202 Rewriter.enableLSRMode();6203 6204 // First, perform some low-level loop optimizations.6205 OptimizeShadowIV();6206 OptimizeLoopTermCond();6207 6208 // If loop preparation eliminates all interesting IV users, bail.6209 if (IU.empty()) return;6210 6211 // Skip nested loops until we can model them better with formulae.6212 if (!L->isInnermost()) {6213 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LSR skipping outer loop " << *L << "\n");6214 return;6215 }6216 6217 // Start collecting data and preparing for the solver.6218 // If number of registers is not the major cost, we cannot benefit from the6219 // current profitable chain optimization which is based on number of6220 // registers.6221 // FIXME: add profitable chain optimization for other kinds major cost, for6222 // example number of instructions.6223 if (TTI.isNumRegsMajorCostOfLSR() || StressIVChain)6224 CollectChains();6225 CollectInterestingTypesAndFactors();6226 CollectFixupsAndInitialFormulae();6227 CollectLoopInvariantFixupsAndFormulae();6228 6229 if (Uses.empty())6230 return;6231 6232 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LSR found " << Uses.size() << " uses:\n";6233 print_uses(dbgs()));6234 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "The baseline solution requires ";6235 BaselineCost.print(dbgs()); dbgs() << "\n");6236 6237 // Now use the reuse data to generate a bunch of interesting ways6238 // to formulate the values needed for the uses.6239 GenerateAllReuseFormulae();6240 6241 FilterOutUndesirableDedicatedRegisters();6242 NarrowSearchSpaceUsingHeuristics();6243 6244 SmallVector<const Formula *, 8> Solution;6245 Solve(Solution);6246 6247 // Release memory that is no longer needed.6248 Factors.clear();6249 Types.clear();6250 RegUses.clear();6251 6252 if (Solution.empty())6253 return;6254 6255#ifndef NDEBUG6256 // Formulae should be legal.6257 for (const LSRUse &LU : Uses) {6258 for (const Formula &F : LU.Formulae)6259 assert(isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy,6260 F) && "Illegal formula generated!");6261 };6262#endif6263 6264 // Now that we've decided what we want, make it so.6265 ImplementSolution(Solution);6266}6267 6268#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)6269void LSRInstance::print_factors_and_types(raw_ostream &OS) const {6270 if (Factors.empty() && Types.empty()) return;6271 6272 OS << "LSR has identified the following interesting factors and types: ";6273 bool First = true;6274 6275 for (int64_t Factor : Factors) {6276 if (!First) OS << ", ";6277 First = false;6278 OS << '*' << Factor;6279 }6280 6281 for (Type *Ty : Types) {6282 if (!First) OS << ", ";6283 First = false;6284 OS << '(' << *Ty << ')';6285 }6286 OS << '\n';6287}6288 6289void LSRInstance::print_fixups(raw_ostream &OS) const {6290 OS << "LSR is examining the following fixup sites:\n";6291 for (const LSRUse &LU : Uses)6292 for (const LSRFixup &LF : LU.Fixups) {6293 dbgs() << " ";6294 LF.print(OS);6295 OS << '\n';6296 }6297}6298 6299void LSRInstance::print_uses(raw_ostream &OS) const {6300 OS << "LSR is examining the following uses:\n";6301 for (const LSRUse &LU : Uses) {6302 dbgs() << " ";6303 LU.print(OS);6304 OS << '\n';6305 for (const Formula &F : LU.Formulae) {6306 OS << " ";6307 F.print(OS);6308 OS << '\n';6309 }6310 }6311}6312 6313void LSRInstance::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {6314 print_factors_and_types(OS);6315 print_fixups(OS);6316 print_uses(OS);6317}6318 6319LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void LSRInstance::dump() const {6320 print(errs()); errs() << '\n';6321}6322#endif6323 6324namespace {6325 6326class LoopStrengthReduce : public LoopPass {6327public:6328 static char ID; // Pass ID, replacement for typeid6329 6330 LoopStrengthReduce();6331 6332private:6333 bool runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) override;6334 void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override;6335};6336 6337} // end anonymous namespace6338 6339LoopStrengthReduce::LoopStrengthReduce() : LoopPass(ID) {6340 initializeLoopStrengthReducePass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());6341}6342 6343void LoopStrengthReduce::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {6344 // We split critical edges, so we change the CFG. However, we do update6345 // many analyses if they are around.6346 AU.addPreservedID(LoopSimplifyID);6347 6348 AU.addRequired<LoopInfoWrapperPass>();6349 AU.addPreserved<LoopInfoWrapperPass>();6350 AU.addRequiredID(LoopSimplifyID);6351 AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();6352 AU.addPreserved<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();6353 AU.addRequired<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>();6354 AU.addPreserved<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>();6355 AU.addRequired<AssumptionCacheTracker>();6356 AU.addRequired<TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass>();6357 // Requiring LoopSimplify a second time here prevents IVUsers from running6358 // twice, since LoopSimplify was invalidated by running ScalarEvolution.6359 AU.addRequiredID(LoopSimplifyID);6360 AU.addRequired<IVUsersWrapperPass>();6361 AU.addPreserved<IVUsersWrapperPass>();6362 AU.addRequired<TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass>();6363 AU.addPreserved<MemorySSAWrapperPass>();6364}6365 6366namespace {6367 6368/// Enables more convenient iteration over a DWARF expression vector.6369static iterator_range<llvm::DIExpression::expr_op_iterator>6370ToDwarfOpIter(SmallVectorImpl<uint64_t> &Expr) {6371 llvm::DIExpression::expr_op_iterator Begin =6372 llvm::DIExpression::expr_op_iterator(Expr.begin());6373 llvm::DIExpression::expr_op_iterator End =6374 llvm::DIExpression::expr_op_iterator(Expr.end());6375 return {Begin, End};6376}6377 6378struct SCEVDbgValueBuilder {6379 SCEVDbgValueBuilder() = default;6380 SCEVDbgValueBuilder(const SCEVDbgValueBuilder &Base) { clone(Base); }6381 6382 void clone(const SCEVDbgValueBuilder &Base) {6383 LocationOps = Base.LocationOps;6384 Expr = Base.Expr;6385 }6386 6387 void clear() {6388 LocationOps.clear();6389 Expr.clear();6390 }6391 6392 /// The DIExpression as we translate the SCEV.6393 SmallVector<uint64_t, 6> Expr;6394 /// The location ops of the DIExpression.6395 SmallVector<Value *, 2> LocationOps;6396 6397 void pushOperator(uint64_t Op) { Expr.push_back(Op); }6398 void pushUInt(uint64_t Operand) { Expr.push_back(Operand); }6399 6400 /// Add a DW_OP_LLVM_arg to the expression, followed by the index of the value6401 /// in the set of values referenced by the expression.6402 void pushLocation(llvm::Value *V) {6403 Expr.push_back(llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_LLVM_arg);6404 auto *It = llvm::find(LocationOps, V);6405 unsigned ArgIndex = 0;6406 if (It != LocationOps.end()) {6407 ArgIndex = std::distance(LocationOps.begin(), It);6408 } else {6409 ArgIndex = LocationOps.size();6410 LocationOps.push_back(V);6411 }6412 Expr.push_back(ArgIndex);6413 }6414 6415 void pushValue(const SCEVUnknown *U) {6416 llvm::Value *V = cast<SCEVUnknown>(U)->getValue();6417 pushLocation(V);6418 }6419 6420 bool pushConst(const SCEVConstant *C) {6421 if (C->getAPInt().getSignificantBits() > 64)6422 return false;6423 Expr.push_back(llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_consts);6424 Expr.push_back(C->getAPInt().getSExtValue());6425 return true;6426 }6427 6428 // Iterating the expression as DWARF ops is convenient when updating6429 // DWARF_OP_LLVM_args.6430 iterator_range<llvm::DIExpression::expr_op_iterator> expr_ops() {6431 return ToDwarfOpIter(Expr);6432 }6433 6434 /// Several SCEV types are sequences of the same arithmetic operator applied6435 /// to constants and values that may be extended or truncated.6436 bool pushArithmeticExpr(const llvm::SCEVCommutativeExpr *CommExpr,6437 uint64_t DwarfOp) {6438 assert((isa<llvm::SCEVAddExpr>(CommExpr) || isa<SCEVMulExpr>(CommExpr)) &&6439 "Expected arithmetic SCEV type");6440 bool Success = true;6441 unsigned EmitOperator = 0;6442 for (const auto &Op : CommExpr->operands()) {6443 Success &= pushSCEV(Op);6444 6445 if (EmitOperator >= 1)6446 pushOperator(DwarfOp);6447 ++EmitOperator;6448 }6449 return Success;6450 }6451 6452 // TODO: Identify and omit noop casts.6453 bool pushCast(const llvm::SCEVCastExpr *C, bool IsSigned) {6454 const llvm::SCEV *Inner = C->getOperand(0);6455 const llvm::Type *Type = C->getType();6456 uint64_t ToWidth = Type->getIntegerBitWidth();6457 bool Success = pushSCEV(Inner);6458 uint64_t CastOps[] = {dwarf::DW_OP_LLVM_convert, ToWidth,6459 IsSigned ? llvm::dwarf::DW_ATE_signed6460 : llvm::dwarf::DW_ATE_unsigned};6461 for (const auto &Op : CastOps)6462 pushOperator(Op);6463 return Success;6464 }6465 6466 // TODO: MinMax - although these haven't been encountered in the test suite.6467 bool pushSCEV(const llvm::SCEV *S) {6468 bool Success = true;6469 if (const SCEVConstant *StartInt = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(S)) {6470 Success &= pushConst(StartInt);6471 6472 } else if (const SCEVUnknown *U = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(S)) {6473 if (!U->getValue())6474 return false;6475 pushLocation(U->getValue());6476 6477 } else if (const SCEVMulExpr *MulRec = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(S)) {6478 Success &= pushArithmeticExpr(MulRec, llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_mul);6479 6480 } else if (const SCEVUDivExpr *UDiv = dyn_cast<SCEVUDivExpr>(S)) {6481 Success &= pushSCEV(UDiv->getLHS());6482 Success &= pushSCEV(UDiv->getRHS());6483 pushOperator(llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_div);6484 6485 } else if (const SCEVCastExpr *Cast = dyn_cast<SCEVCastExpr>(S)) {6486 // Assert if a new and unknown SCEVCastEXpr type is encountered.6487 assert((isa<SCEVZeroExtendExpr>(Cast) || isa<SCEVTruncateExpr>(Cast) ||6488 isa<SCEVPtrToIntExpr>(Cast) || isa<SCEVSignExtendExpr>(Cast)) &&6489 "Unexpected cast type in SCEV.");6490 Success &= pushCast(Cast, (isa<SCEVSignExtendExpr>(Cast)));6491 6492 } else if (const SCEVAddExpr *AddExpr = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S)) {6493 Success &= pushArithmeticExpr(AddExpr, llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_plus);6494 6495 } else if (isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {6496 // Nested SCEVAddRecExpr are generated by nested loops and are currently6497 // unsupported.6498 return false;6499 6500 } else {6501 return false;6502 }6503 return Success;6504 }6505 6506 /// Return true if the combination of arithmetic operator and underlying6507 /// SCEV constant value is an identity function.6508 bool isIdentityFunction(uint64_t Op, const SCEV *S) {6509 if (const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(S)) {6510 if (C->getAPInt().getSignificantBits() > 64)6511 return false;6512 int64_t I = C->getAPInt().getSExtValue();6513 switch (Op) {6514 case llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_plus:6515 case llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_minus:6516 return I == 0;6517 case llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_mul:6518 case llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_div:6519 return I == 1;6520 }6521 }6522 return false;6523 }6524 6525 /// Convert a SCEV of a value to a DIExpression that is pushed onto the6526 /// builder's expression stack. The stack should already contain an6527 /// expression for the iteration count, so that it can be multiplied by6528 /// the stride and added to the start.6529 /// Components of the expression are omitted if they are an identity function.6530 /// Chain (non-affine) SCEVs are not supported.6531 bool SCEVToValueExpr(const llvm::SCEVAddRecExpr &SAR, ScalarEvolution &SE) {6532 assert(SAR.isAffine() && "Expected affine SCEV");6533 const SCEV *Start = SAR.getStart();6534 const SCEV *Stride = SAR.getStepRecurrence(SE);6535 6536 // Skip pushing arithmetic noops.6537 if (!isIdentityFunction(llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_mul, Stride)) {6538 if (!pushSCEV(Stride))6539 return false;6540 pushOperator(llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_mul);6541 }6542 if (!isIdentityFunction(llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_plus, Start)) {6543 if (!pushSCEV(Start))6544 return false;6545 pushOperator(llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_plus);6546 }6547 return true;6548 }6549 6550 /// Create an expression that is an offset from a value (usually the IV).6551 void createOffsetExpr(int64_t Offset, Value *OffsetValue) {6552 pushLocation(OffsetValue);6553 DIExpression::appendOffset(Expr, Offset);6554 LLVM_DEBUG(6555 dbgs() << "scev-salvage: Generated IV offset expression. Offset: "6556 << std::to_string(Offset) << "\n");6557 }6558 6559 /// Combine a translation of the SCEV and the IV to create an expression that6560 /// recovers a location's value.6561 /// returns true if an expression was created.6562 bool createIterCountExpr(const SCEV *S,6563 const SCEVDbgValueBuilder &IterationCount,6564 ScalarEvolution &SE) {6565 // SCEVs for SSA values are most frquently of the form6566 // {start,+,stride}, but sometimes they are ({start,+,stride} + %a + ..).6567 // This is because %a is a PHI node that is not the IV. However, these6568 // SCEVs have not been observed to result in debuginfo-lossy optimisations,6569 // so its not expected this point will be reached.6570 if (!isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S))6571 return false;6572 6573 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "scev-salvage: Location to salvage SCEV: " << *S6574 << '\n');6575 6576 const auto *Rec = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S);6577 if (!Rec->isAffine())6578 return false;6579 6580 if (S->getExpressionSize() > MaxSCEVSalvageExpressionSize)6581 return false;6582 6583 // Initialise a new builder with the iteration count expression. In6584 // combination with the value's SCEV this enables recovery.6585 clone(IterationCount);6586 if (!SCEVToValueExpr(*Rec, SE))6587 return false;6588 6589 return true;6590 }6591 6592 /// Convert a SCEV of a value to a DIExpression that is pushed onto the6593 /// builder's expression stack. The stack should already contain an6594 /// expression for the iteration count, so that it can be multiplied by6595 /// the stride and added to the start.6596 /// Components of the expression are omitted if they are an identity function.6597 bool SCEVToIterCountExpr(const llvm::SCEVAddRecExpr &SAR,6598 ScalarEvolution &SE) {6599 assert(SAR.isAffine() && "Expected affine SCEV");6600 const SCEV *Start = SAR.getStart();6601 const SCEV *Stride = SAR.getStepRecurrence(SE);6602 6603 // Skip pushing arithmetic noops.6604 if (!isIdentityFunction(llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_minus, Start)) {6605 if (!pushSCEV(Start))6606 return false;6607 pushOperator(llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_minus);6608 }6609 if (!isIdentityFunction(llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_div, Stride)) {6610 if (!pushSCEV(Stride))6611 return false;6612 pushOperator(llvm::dwarf::DW_OP_div);6613 }6614 return true;6615 }6616 6617 // Append the current expression and locations to a location list and an6618 // expression list. Modify the DW_OP_LLVM_arg indexes to account for6619 // the locations already present in the destination list.6620 void appendToVectors(SmallVectorImpl<uint64_t> &DestExpr,6621 SmallVectorImpl<Value *> &DestLocations) {6622 assert(!DestLocations.empty() &&6623 "Expected the locations vector to contain the IV");6624 // The DWARF_OP_LLVM_arg arguments of the expression being appended must be6625 // modified to account for the locations already in the destination vector.6626 // All builders contain the IV as the first location op.6627 assert(!LocationOps.empty() &&6628 "Expected the location ops to contain the IV.");6629 // DestIndexMap[n] contains the index in DestLocations for the nth6630 // location in this SCEVDbgValueBuilder.6631 SmallVector<uint64_t, 2> DestIndexMap;6632 for (const auto &Op : LocationOps) {6633 auto It = find(DestLocations, Op);6634 if (It != DestLocations.end()) {6635 // Location already exists in DestLocations, reuse existing ArgIndex.6636 DestIndexMap.push_back(std::distance(DestLocations.begin(), It));6637 continue;6638 }6639 // Location is not in DestLocations, add it.6640 DestIndexMap.push_back(DestLocations.size());6641 DestLocations.push_back(Op);6642 }6643 6644 for (const auto &Op : expr_ops()) {6645 if (Op.getOp() != dwarf::DW_OP_LLVM_arg) {6646 Op.appendToVector(DestExpr);6647 continue;6648 }6649 6650 DestExpr.push_back(dwarf::DW_OP_LLVM_arg);6651 // `DW_OP_LLVM_arg n` represents the nth LocationOp in this SCEV,6652 // DestIndexMap[n] contains its new index in DestLocations.6653 uint64_t NewIndex = DestIndexMap[Op.getArg(0)];6654 DestExpr.push_back(NewIndex);6655 }6656 }6657};6658 6659/// Holds all the required data to salvage a dbg.value using the pre-LSR SCEVs6660/// and DIExpression.6661struct DVIRecoveryRec {6662 DVIRecoveryRec(DbgVariableRecord *DVR)6663 : DbgRef(DVR), Expr(DVR->getExpression()), HadLocationArgList(false) {}6664 6665 DbgVariableRecord *DbgRef;6666 DIExpression *Expr;6667 bool HadLocationArgList;6668 SmallVector<WeakVH, 2> LocationOps;6669 SmallVector<const llvm::SCEV *, 2> SCEVs;6670 SmallVector<std::unique_ptr<SCEVDbgValueBuilder>, 2> RecoveryExprs;6671 6672 void clear() {6673 for (auto &RE : RecoveryExprs)6674 RE.reset();6675 RecoveryExprs.clear();6676 }6677 6678 ~DVIRecoveryRec() { clear(); }6679};6680} // namespace6681 6682/// Returns the total number of DW_OP_llvm_arg operands in the expression.6683/// This helps in determining if a DIArglist is necessary or can be omitted from6684/// the dbg.value.6685static unsigned numLLVMArgOps(SmallVectorImpl<uint64_t> &Expr) {6686 auto expr_ops = ToDwarfOpIter(Expr);6687 unsigned Count = 0;6688 for (auto Op : expr_ops)6689 if (Op.getOp() == dwarf::DW_OP_LLVM_arg)6690 Count++;6691 return Count;6692}6693 6694/// Overwrites DVI with the location and Ops as the DIExpression. This will6695/// create an invalid expression if Ops has any dwarf::DW_OP_llvm_arg operands,6696/// because a DIArglist is not created for the first argument of the dbg.value.6697template <typename T>6698static void updateDVIWithLocation(T &DbgVal, Value *Location,6699 SmallVectorImpl<uint64_t> &Ops) {6700 assert(numLLVMArgOps(Ops) == 0 && "Expected expression that does not "6701 "contain any DW_OP_llvm_arg operands.");6702 DbgVal.setRawLocation(ValueAsMetadata::get(Location));6703 DbgVal.setExpression(DIExpression::get(DbgVal.getContext(), Ops));6704 DbgVal.setExpression(DIExpression::get(DbgVal.getContext(), Ops));6705}6706 6707/// Overwrite DVI with locations placed into a DIArglist.6708template <typename T>6709static void updateDVIWithLocations(T &DbgVal,6710 SmallVectorImpl<Value *> &Locations,6711 SmallVectorImpl<uint64_t> &Ops) {6712 assert(numLLVMArgOps(Ops) != 0 &&6713 "Expected expression that references DIArglist locations using "6714 "DW_OP_llvm_arg operands.");6715 SmallVector<ValueAsMetadata *, 3> MetadataLocs;6716 for (Value *V : Locations)6717 MetadataLocs.push_back(ValueAsMetadata::get(V));6718 auto ValArrayRef = llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::ValueAsMetadata *>(MetadataLocs);6719 DbgVal.setRawLocation(llvm::DIArgList::get(DbgVal.getContext(), ValArrayRef));6720 DbgVal.setExpression(DIExpression::get(DbgVal.getContext(), Ops));6721}6722 6723/// Write the new expression and new location ops for the dbg.value. If possible6724/// reduce the szie of the dbg.value by omitting DIArglist. This6725/// can be omitted if:6726/// 1. There is only a single location, refenced by a single DW_OP_llvm_arg.6727/// 2. The DW_OP_LLVM_arg is the first operand in the expression.6728static void UpdateDbgValue(DVIRecoveryRec &DVIRec,6729 SmallVectorImpl<Value *> &NewLocationOps,6730 SmallVectorImpl<uint64_t> &NewExpr) {6731 DbgVariableRecord *DbgVal = DVIRec.DbgRef;6732 unsigned NumLLVMArgs = numLLVMArgOps(NewExpr);6733 if (NumLLVMArgs == 0) {6734 // Location assumed to be on the stack.6735 updateDVIWithLocation(*DbgVal, NewLocationOps[0], NewExpr);6736 } else if (NumLLVMArgs == 1 && NewExpr[0] == dwarf::DW_OP_LLVM_arg) {6737 // There is only a single DW_OP_llvm_arg at the start of the expression,6738 // so it can be omitted along with DIArglist.6739 assert(NewExpr[1] == 0 &&6740 "Lone LLVM_arg in a DIExpression should refer to location-op 0.");6741 llvm::SmallVector<uint64_t, 6> ShortenedOps(llvm::drop_begin(NewExpr, 2));6742 updateDVIWithLocation(*DbgVal, NewLocationOps[0], ShortenedOps);6743 } else {6744 // Multiple DW_OP_llvm_arg, so DIArgList is strictly necessary.6745 updateDVIWithLocations(*DbgVal, NewLocationOps, NewExpr);6746 }6747 6748 // If the DIExpression was previously empty then add the stack terminator.6749 // Non-empty expressions have only had elements inserted into them and so6750 // the terminator should already be present e.g. stack_value or fragment.6751 DIExpression *SalvageExpr = DbgVal->getExpression();6752 if (!DVIRec.Expr->isComplex() && SalvageExpr->isComplex()) {6753 SalvageExpr = DIExpression::append(SalvageExpr, {dwarf::DW_OP_stack_value});6754 DbgVal->setExpression(SalvageExpr);6755 }6756}6757 6758/// Cached location ops may be erased during LSR, in which case a poison is6759/// required when restoring from the cache. The type of that location is no6760/// longer available, so just use int8. The poison will be replaced by one or6761/// more locations later when a SCEVDbgValueBuilder selects alternative6762/// locations to use for the salvage.6763static Value *getValueOrPoison(WeakVH &VH, LLVMContext &C) {6764 return (VH) ? VH : PoisonValue::get(llvm::Type::getInt8Ty(C));6765}6766 6767/// Restore the DVI's pre-LSR arguments. Substitute undef for any erased values.6768static void restorePreTransformState(DVIRecoveryRec &DVIRec) {6769 DbgVariableRecord *DbgVal = DVIRec.DbgRef;6770 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "scev-salvage: restore dbg.value to pre-LSR state\n"6771 << "scev-salvage: post-LSR: " << *DbgVal << '\n');6772 assert(DVIRec.Expr && "Expected an expression");6773 DbgVal->setExpression(DVIRec.Expr);6774 6775 // Even a single location-op may be inside a DIArgList and referenced with6776 // DW_OP_LLVM_arg, which is valid only with a DIArgList.6777 if (!DVIRec.HadLocationArgList) {6778 assert(DVIRec.LocationOps.size() == 1 &&6779 "Unexpected number of location ops.");6780 // LSR's unsuccessful salvage attempt may have added DIArgList, which in6781 // this case was not present before, so force the location back to a6782 // single uncontained Value.6783 Value *CachedValue =6784 getValueOrPoison(DVIRec.LocationOps[0], DbgVal->getContext());6785 DbgVal->setRawLocation(ValueAsMetadata::get(CachedValue));6786 } else {6787 SmallVector<ValueAsMetadata *, 3> MetadataLocs;6788 for (WeakVH VH : DVIRec.LocationOps) {6789 Value *CachedValue = getValueOrPoison(VH, DbgVal->getContext());6790 MetadataLocs.push_back(ValueAsMetadata::get(CachedValue));6791 }6792 auto ValArrayRef = llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::ValueAsMetadata *>(MetadataLocs);6793 DbgVal->setRawLocation(6794 llvm::DIArgList::get(DbgVal->getContext(), ValArrayRef));6795 }6796 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "scev-salvage: pre-LSR: " << *DbgVal << '\n');6797}6798 6799static bool SalvageDVI(llvm::Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE,6800 llvm::PHINode *LSRInductionVar, DVIRecoveryRec &DVIRec,6801 const SCEV *SCEVInductionVar,6802 SCEVDbgValueBuilder IterCountExpr) {6803 6804 if (!DVIRec.DbgRef->isKillLocation())6805 return false;6806 6807 // LSR may have caused several changes to the dbg.value in the failed salvage6808 // attempt. So restore the DIExpression, the location ops and also the6809 // location ops format, which is always DIArglist for multiple ops, but only6810 // sometimes for a single op.6811 restorePreTransformState(DVIRec);6812 6813 // LocationOpIndexMap[i] will store the post-LSR location index of6814 // the non-optimised out location at pre-LSR index i.6815 SmallVector<int64_t, 2> LocationOpIndexMap;6816 LocationOpIndexMap.assign(DVIRec.LocationOps.size(), -1);6817 SmallVector<Value *, 2> NewLocationOps;6818 NewLocationOps.push_back(LSRInductionVar);6819 6820 for (unsigned i = 0; i < DVIRec.LocationOps.size(); i++) {6821 WeakVH VH = DVIRec.LocationOps[i];6822 // Place the locations not optimised out in the list first, avoiding6823 // inserts later. The map is used to update the DIExpression's6824 // DW_OP_LLVM_arg arguments as the expression is updated.6825 if (VH && !isa<UndefValue>(VH)) {6826 NewLocationOps.push_back(VH);6827 LocationOpIndexMap[i] = NewLocationOps.size() - 1;6828 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "scev-salvage: Location index " << i6829 << " now at index " << LocationOpIndexMap[i] << "\n");6830 continue;6831 }6832 6833 // It's possible that a value referred to in the SCEV may have been6834 // optimised out by LSR.6835 if (SE.containsErasedValue(DVIRec.SCEVs[i]) ||6836 SE.containsUndefs(DVIRec.SCEVs[i])) {6837 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "scev-salvage: SCEV for location at index: " << i6838 << " refers to a location that is now undef or erased. "6839 "Salvage abandoned.\n");6840 return false;6841 }6842 6843 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "scev-salvage: salvaging location at index " << i6844 << " with SCEV: " << *DVIRec.SCEVs[i] << "\n");6845 6846 DVIRec.RecoveryExprs[i] = std::make_unique<SCEVDbgValueBuilder>();6847 SCEVDbgValueBuilder *SalvageExpr = DVIRec.RecoveryExprs[i].get();6848 6849 // Create an offset-based salvage expression if possible, as it requires6850 // less DWARF ops than an iteration count-based expression.6851 if (std::optional<APInt> Offset =6852 SE.computeConstantDifference(DVIRec.SCEVs[i], SCEVInductionVar)) {6853 if (Offset->getSignificantBits() <= 64)6854 SalvageExpr->createOffsetExpr(Offset->getSExtValue(), LSRInductionVar);6855 else6856 return false;6857 } else if (!SalvageExpr->createIterCountExpr(DVIRec.SCEVs[i], IterCountExpr,6858 SE))6859 return false;6860 }6861 6862 // Merge the DbgValueBuilder generated expressions and the original6863 // DIExpression, place the result into an new vector.6864 SmallVector<uint64_t, 3> NewExpr;6865 if (DVIRec.Expr->getNumElements() == 0) {6866 assert(DVIRec.RecoveryExprs.size() == 1 &&6867 "Expected only a single recovery expression for an empty "6868 "DIExpression.");6869 assert(DVIRec.RecoveryExprs[0] &&6870 "Expected a SCEVDbgSalvageBuilder for location 0");6871 SCEVDbgValueBuilder *B = DVIRec.RecoveryExprs[0].get();6872 B->appendToVectors(NewExpr, NewLocationOps);6873 }6874 for (const auto &Op : DVIRec.Expr->expr_ops()) {6875 // Most Ops needn't be updated.6876 if (Op.getOp() != dwarf::DW_OP_LLVM_arg) {6877 Op.appendToVector(NewExpr);6878 continue;6879 }6880 6881 uint64_t LocationArgIndex = Op.getArg(0);6882 SCEVDbgValueBuilder *DbgBuilder =6883 DVIRec.RecoveryExprs[LocationArgIndex].get();6884 // The location doesn't have s SCEVDbgValueBuilder, so LSR did not6885 // optimise it away. So just translate the argument to the updated6886 // location index.6887 if (!DbgBuilder) {6888 NewExpr.push_back(dwarf::DW_OP_LLVM_arg);6889 assert(LocationOpIndexMap[Op.getArg(0)] != -1 &&6890 "Expected a positive index for the location-op position.");6891 NewExpr.push_back(LocationOpIndexMap[Op.getArg(0)]);6892 continue;6893 }6894 // The location has a recovery expression.6895 DbgBuilder->appendToVectors(NewExpr, NewLocationOps);6896 }6897 6898 UpdateDbgValue(DVIRec, NewLocationOps, NewExpr);6899 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "scev-salvage: Updated DVI: " << *DVIRec.DbgRef << "\n");6900 return true;6901}6902 6903/// Obtain an expression for the iteration count, then attempt to salvage the6904/// dbg.value intrinsics.6905static void DbgRewriteSalvageableDVIs(6906 llvm::Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE, llvm::PHINode *LSRInductionVar,6907 SmallVector<std::unique_ptr<DVIRecoveryRec>, 2> &DVIToUpdate) {6908 if (DVIToUpdate.empty())6909 return;6910 6911 const llvm::SCEV *SCEVInductionVar = SE.getSCEV(LSRInductionVar);6912 assert(SCEVInductionVar &&6913 "Anticipated a SCEV for the post-LSR induction variable");6914 6915 if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *IVAddRec =6916 dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SCEVInductionVar)) {6917 if (!IVAddRec->isAffine())6918 return;6919 6920 // Prevent translation using excessive resources.6921 if (IVAddRec->getExpressionSize() > MaxSCEVSalvageExpressionSize)6922 return;6923 6924 // The iteration count is required to recover location values.6925 SCEVDbgValueBuilder IterCountExpr;6926 IterCountExpr.pushLocation(LSRInductionVar);6927 if (!IterCountExpr.SCEVToIterCountExpr(*IVAddRec, SE))6928 return;6929 6930 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "scev-salvage: IV SCEV: " << *SCEVInductionVar6931 << '\n');6932 6933 for (auto &DVIRec : DVIToUpdate) {6934 SalvageDVI(L, SE, LSRInductionVar, *DVIRec, SCEVInductionVar,6935 IterCountExpr);6936 }6937 }6938}6939 6940/// Identify and cache salvageable DVI locations and expressions along with the6941/// corresponding SCEV(s). Also ensure that the DVI is not deleted between6942/// cacheing and salvaging.6943static void DbgGatherSalvagableDVI(6944 Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE,6945 SmallVector<std::unique_ptr<DVIRecoveryRec>, 2> &SalvageableDVISCEVs) {6946 for (const auto &B : L->getBlocks()) {6947 for (auto &I : *B) {6948 for (DbgVariableRecord &DbgVal : filterDbgVars(I.getDbgRecordRange())) {6949 if (!DbgVal.isDbgValue() && !DbgVal.isDbgAssign())6950 continue;6951 6952 // Ensure that if any location op is undef that the dbg.vlue is not6953 // cached.6954 if (DbgVal.isKillLocation())6955 continue;6956 6957 // Check that the location op SCEVs are suitable for translation to6958 // DIExpression.6959 const auto &HasTranslatableLocationOps =6960 [&](const DbgVariableRecord &DbgValToTranslate) -> bool {6961 for (const auto LocOp : DbgValToTranslate.location_ops()) {6962 if (!LocOp)6963 return false;6964 6965 if (!SE.isSCEVable(LocOp->getType()))6966 return false;6967 6968 const SCEV *S = SE.getSCEV(LocOp);6969 if (SE.containsUndefs(S))6970 return false;6971 }6972 return true;6973 };6974 6975 if (!HasTranslatableLocationOps(DbgVal))6976 continue;6977 6978 std::unique_ptr<DVIRecoveryRec> NewRec =6979 std::make_unique<DVIRecoveryRec>(&DbgVal);6980 // Each location Op may need a SCEVDbgValueBuilder in order to recover6981 // it. Pre-allocating a vector will enable quick lookups of the builder6982 // later during the salvage.6983 NewRec->RecoveryExprs.resize(DbgVal.getNumVariableLocationOps());6984 for (const auto LocOp : DbgVal.location_ops()) {6985 NewRec->SCEVs.push_back(SE.getSCEV(LocOp));6986 NewRec->LocationOps.push_back(LocOp);6987 NewRec->HadLocationArgList = DbgVal.hasArgList();6988 }6989 SalvageableDVISCEVs.push_back(std::move(NewRec));6990 }6991 }6992 }6993}6994 6995/// Ideally pick the PHI IV inserted by ScalarEvolutionExpander. As a fallback6996/// any PHi from the loop header is usable, but may have less chance of6997/// surviving subsequent transforms.6998static llvm::PHINode *GetInductionVariable(const Loop &L, ScalarEvolution &SE,6999 const LSRInstance &LSR) {7000 7001 auto IsSuitableIV = [&](PHINode *P) {7002 if (!SE.isSCEVable(P->getType()))7003 return false;7004 if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *Rec = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getSCEV(P)))7005 return Rec->isAffine() && !SE.containsUndefs(SE.getSCEV(P));7006 return false;7007 };7008 7009 // For now, just pick the first IV that was generated and inserted by7010 // ScalarEvolution. Ideally pick an IV that is unlikely to be optimised away7011 // by subsequent transforms.7012 for (const WeakVH &IV : LSR.getScalarEvolutionIVs()) {7013 if (!IV)7014 continue;7015 7016 // There should only be PHI node IVs.7017 PHINode *P = cast<PHINode>(&*IV);7018 7019 if (IsSuitableIV(P))7020 return P;7021 }7022 7023 for (PHINode &P : L.getHeader()->phis()) {7024 if (IsSuitableIV(&P))7025 return &P;7026 }7027 return nullptr;7028}7029 7030static bool ReduceLoopStrength(Loop *L, IVUsers &IU, ScalarEvolution &SE,7031 DominatorTree &DT, LoopInfo &LI,7032 const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,7033 AssumptionCache &AC, TargetLibraryInfo &TLI,7034 MemorySSA *MSSA) {7035 7036 // Debug preservation - before we start removing anything identify which DVI7037 // meet the salvageable criteria and store their DIExpression and SCEVs.7038 SmallVector<std::unique_ptr<DVIRecoveryRec>, 2> SalvageableDVIRecords;7039 DbgGatherSalvagableDVI(L, SE, SalvageableDVIRecords);7040 7041 bool Changed = false;7042 std::unique_ptr<MemorySSAUpdater> MSSAU;7043 if (MSSA)7044 MSSAU = std::make_unique<MemorySSAUpdater>(MSSA);7045 7046 // Run the main LSR transformation.7047 const LSRInstance &Reducer =7048 LSRInstance(L, IU, SE, DT, LI, TTI, AC, TLI, MSSAU.get());7049 Changed |= Reducer.getChanged();7050 7051 // Remove any extra phis created by processing inner loops.7052 Changed |= DeleteDeadPHIs(L->getHeader(), &TLI, MSSAU.get());7053 if (EnablePhiElim && L->isLoopSimplifyForm()) {7054 SmallVector<WeakTrackingVH, 16> DeadInsts;7055 const DataLayout &DL = L->getHeader()->getDataLayout();7056 SCEVExpander Rewriter(SE, DL, "lsr", false);7057#if LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS7058 Rewriter.setDebugType(DEBUG_TYPE);7059#endif7060 unsigned numFolded = Rewriter.replaceCongruentIVs(L, &DT, DeadInsts, &TTI);7061 Rewriter.clear();7062 if (numFolded) {7063 Changed = true;7064 RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructionsPermissive(DeadInsts, &TLI,7065 MSSAU.get());7066 DeleteDeadPHIs(L->getHeader(), &TLI, MSSAU.get());7067 }7068 }7069 // LSR may at times remove all uses of an induction variable from a loop.7070 // The only remaining use is the PHI in the exit block.7071 // When this is the case, if the exit value of the IV can be calculated using7072 // SCEV, we can replace the exit block PHI with the final value of the IV and7073 // skip the updates in each loop iteration.7074 if (L->isRecursivelyLCSSAForm(DT, LI) && L->getExitBlock()) {7075 SmallVector<WeakTrackingVH, 16> DeadInsts;7076 const DataLayout &DL = L->getHeader()->getDataLayout();7077 SCEVExpander Rewriter(SE, DL, "lsr", true);7078 int Rewrites = rewriteLoopExitValues(L, &LI, &TLI, &SE, &TTI, Rewriter, &DT,7079 UnusedIndVarInLoop, DeadInsts);7080 Rewriter.clear();7081 if (Rewrites) {7082 Changed = true;7083 RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructionsPermissive(DeadInsts, &TLI,7084 MSSAU.get());7085 DeleteDeadPHIs(L->getHeader(), &TLI, MSSAU.get());7086 }7087 }7088 7089 if (SalvageableDVIRecords.empty())7090 return Changed;7091 7092 // Obtain relevant IVs and attempt to rewrite the salvageable DVIs with7093 // expressions composed using the derived iteration count.7094 // TODO: Allow for multiple IV references for nested AddRecSCEVs7095 for (const auto &L : LI) {7096 if (llvm::PHINode *IV = GetInductionVariable(*L, SE, Reducer))7097 DbgRewriteSalvageableDVIs(L, SE, IV, SalvageableDVIRecords);7098 else {7099 LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "scev-salvage: SCEV salvaging not possible. An IV "7100 "could not be identified.\n");7101 }7102 }7103 7104 for (auto &Rec : SalvageableDVIRecords)7105 Rec->clear();7106 SalvageableDVIRecords.clear();7107 return Changed;7108}7109 7110bool LoopStrengthReduce::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager & /*LPM*/) {7111 if (skipLoop(L))7112 return false;7113 7114 auto &IU = getAnalysis<IVUsersWrapperPass>().getIU();7115 auto &SE = getAnalysis<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>().getSE();7116 auto &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree();7117 auto &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo();7118 const auto &TTI = getAnalysis<TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass>().getTTI(7119 *L->getHeader()->getParent());7120 auto &AC = getAnalysis<AssumptionCacheTracker>().getAssumptionCache(7121 *L->getHeader()->getParent());7122 auto &TLI = getAnalysis<TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass>().getTLI(7123 *L->getHeader()->getParent());7124 auto *MSSAAnalysis = getAnalysisIfAvailable<MemorySSAWrapperPass>();7125 MemorySSA *MSSA = nullptr;7126 if (MSSAAnalysis)7127 MSSA = &MSSAAnalysis->getMSSA();7128 return ReduceLoopStrength(L, IU, SE, DT, LI, TTI, AC, TLI, MSSA);7129}7130 7131PreservedAnalyses LoopStrengthReducePass::run(Loop &L, LoopAnalysisManager &AM,7132 LoopStandardAnalysisResults &AR,7133 LPMUpdater &) {7134 if (!ReduceLoopStrength(&L, AM.getResult<IVUsersAnalysis>(L, AR), AR.SE,7135 AR.DT, AR.LI, AR.TTI, AR.AC, AR.TLI, AR.MSSA))7136 return PreservedAnalyses::all();7137 7138 auto PA = getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses();7139 if (AR.MSSA)7140 PA.preserve<MemorySSAAnalysis>();7141 return PA;7142}7143 7144char LoopStrengthReduce::ID = 0;7145 7146INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(LoopStrengthReduce, "loop-reduce",7147 "Loop Strength Reduction", false, false)7148INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass)7149INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass)7150INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass)7151INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(IVUsersWrapperPass)7152INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopInfoWrapperPass)7153INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopSimplify)7154INITIALIZE_PASS_END(LoopStrengthReduce, "loop-reduce",7155 "Loop Strength Reduction", false, false)7156 7157Pass *llvm::createLoopStrengthReducePass() { return new LoopStrengthReduce(); }7158