42 lines · plain
1; RUN: opt %loadNPMPolly -polly-parallel -polly-parallel-force '-passes=polly-custom<ast>' -polly-print-ast -disable-output < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=AST2; RUN: opt %loadNPMPolly -polly-parallel -polly-parallel-force '-passes=polly<no-default-opts>' -S -verify-dom-info < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=IR3 4; This test case verifies that we create correct code even if two OpenMP loops5; share common outer variables.6 7; AST: Stmt_for_body35(0);8; AST: #pragma simd9; AST: #pragma omp parallel for10; AST: for (int c0 = 1; c0 < -p_0 + nj - 1; c0 += 1)11; AST: Stmt_for_body35(c0);12 13; IR: @foo_polly_subfn14; IR-NOT: @foo_polly_subfn_115 16target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"17 18define void @foo(i64 %nj, ptr %R) {19entry:20 br label %for.cond1.preheader21 22for.cond1.preheader:23 %k.014 = phi i64 [ %inc87, %for.inc86 ], [ 0, %entry ]24 %j.010 = add nsw i64 %k.014, 125 br i1 undef, label %for.body35, label %for.inc8626 27for.body35:28 %j.012 = phi i64 [ %j.0, %for.body35 ], [ %j.010, %for.cond1.preheader ]29 %arrayidx39 = getelementptr inbounds [512 x double], ptr %R, i64 0, i64 %j.01230 store double 0.000000e+00, ptr %arrayidx3931 %j.0 = add nsw i64 %j.012, 132 %cmp34 = icmp slt i64 %j.0, %nj33 br i1 %cmp34, label %for.body35, label %for.inc8634 35for.inc86:36 %inc87 = add nsw i64 %k.014, 137 br i1 undef, label %for.cond1.preheader, label %for.end8838 39for.end88:40 ret void41}42